Cargando…

Comparison of Blue and Green Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Imaging to Detect Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects

PURPOSE: We detected retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) with both blue and green laser sources and evaluated image quality based on laser wavelength. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational case study. Blue and green CSLO images of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joung, Joo Young, Lee, Won June, Lee, Byung Ro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30977322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2018.0075
_version_ 1783410622659035136
author Joung, Joo Young
Lee, Won June
Lee, Byung Ro
author_facet Joung, Joo Young
Lee, Won June
Lee, Byung Ro
author_sort Joung, Joo Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We detected retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) with both blue and green laser sources and evaluated image quality based on laser wavelength. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational case study. Blue and green CSLO images of 181 eyes with suspected glaucoma were evaluated and compared. Three independent observers identified the presence of RNFL defects and determined which CSLO imaging source provided superior visibility of the defect. After assessing the defect imaging by laser source, demographics and image quality indices of optical coherence tomography between blue better and green better groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Both blue and green CSLO showed high discriminating ability for RNFL defects. The discriminating ability of blue CSLO was significantly greater than that of green CSLO (p = 0.004). Among eyes with a detectable RNFL defect, 61.8% were better visualized with the blue laser compared to the green laser. Compared with the blue better group, the green better group was significantly older (p = 0.009), had a greater proportion of females (p = 0.005), had poorer best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.001), more severe cataracts (p = 0.001), lower signal strength (p = 0.003), and poor image quality indices (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both blue and green CSLO imaging was useful for detecting RNFL defects, but blue CSLO was superior to green CSLO in quality of RNFL defect imaging in most patients with clear media.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6462473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64624732019-04-21 Comparison of Blue and Green Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Imaging to Detect Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects Joung, Joo Young Lee, Won June Lee, Byung Ro Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: We detected retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) with both blue and green laser sources and evaluated image quality based on laser wavelength. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational case study. Blue and green CSLO images of 181 eyes with suspected glaucoma were evaluated and compared. Three independent observers identified the presence of RNFL defects and determined which CSLO imaging source provided superior visibility of the defect. After assessing the defect imaging by laser source, demographics and image quality indices of optical coherence tomography between blue better and green better groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Both blue and green CSLO showed high discriminating ability for RNFL defects. The discriminating ability of blue CSLO was significantly greater than that of green CSLO (p = 0.004). Among eyes with a detectable RNFL defect, 61.8% were better visualized with the blue laser compared to the green laser. Compared with the blue better group, the green better group was significantly older (p = 0.009), had a greater proportion of females (p = 0.005), had poorer best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.001), more severe cataracts (p = 0.001), lower signal strength (p = 0.003), and poor image quality indices (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both blue and green CSLO imaging was useful for detecting RNFL defects, but blue CSLO was superior to green CSLO in quality of RNFL defect imaging in most patients with clear media. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2019-04 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6462473/ /pubmed/30977322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2018.0075 Text en © 2019 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Joung, Joo Young
Lee, Won June
Lee, Byung Ro
Comparison of Blue and Green Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Imaging to Detect Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects
title Comparison of Blue and Green Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Imaging to Detect Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects
title_full Comparison of Blue and Green Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Imaging to Detect Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects
title_fullStr Comparison of Blue and Green Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Imaging to Detect Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Blue and Green Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Imaging to Detect Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects
title_short Comparison of Blue and Green Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Imaging to Detect Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects
title_sort comparison of blue and green confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging to detect retinal nerve fiber layer defects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30977322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2018.0075
work_keys_str_mv AT joungjooyoung comparisonofblueandgreenconfocalscanninglaserophthalmoscopeimagingtodetectretinalnervefiberlayerdefects
AT leewonjune comparisonofblueandgreenconfocalscanninglaserophthalmoscopeimagingtodetectretinalnervefiberlayerdefects
AT leebyungro comparisonofblueandgreenconfocalscanninglaserophthalmoscopeimagingtodetectretinalnervefiberlayerdefects