Cargando…

Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning

Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bunte, Sebastian, Lill, Tobias, Falk, Maximilian, Stroethoff, Martin, Raupach, Annika, Mathes, Alexander, Heinen, André, Hollmann, Markus W., Huhn, Ragnar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30901956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030396
_version_ 1783410655751045120
author Bunte, Sebastian
Lill, Tobias
Falk, Maximilian
Stroethoff, Martin
Raupach, Annika
Mathes, Alexander
Heinen, André
Hollmann, Markus W.
Huhn, Ragnar
author_facet Bunte, Sebastian
Lill, Tobias
Falk, Maximilian
Stroethoff, Martin
Raupach, Annika
Mathes, Alexander
Heinen, André
Hollmann, Markus W.
Huhn, Ragnar
author_sort Bunte, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 μM), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 μM) or levosimendan (0.3 μM) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 ± 9%, Prop-Con: 56 ± 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 ± 8%, Dex-Con: 53 ± 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 ± 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 ± 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 ± 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 ± 7%; p < 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 ± 6%; p < 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 ± 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6462902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64629022019-04-19 Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning Bunte, Sebastian Lill, Tobias Falk, Maximilian Stroethoff, Martin Raupach, Annika Mathes, Alexander Heinen, André Hollmann, Markus W. Huhn, Ragnar J Clin Med Article Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 μM), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 μM) or levosimendan (0.3 μM) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 ± 9%, Prop-Con: 56 ± 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 ± 8%, Dex-Con: 53 ± 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 ± 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 ± 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 ± 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 ± 7%; p < 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 ± 6%; p < 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 ± 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning. MDPI 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6462902/ /pubmed/30901956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030396 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bunte, Sebastian
Lill, Tobias
Falk, Maximilian
Stroethoff, Martin
Raupach, Annika
Mathes, Alexander
Heinen, André
Hollmann, Markus W.
Huhn, Ragnar
Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_full Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_fullStr Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_short Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_sort impact of anesthetics on cardioprotection induced by pharmacological preconditioning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30901956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030396
work_keys_str_mv AT buntesebastian impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT lilltobias impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT falkmaximilian impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT stroethoffmartin impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT raupachannika impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT mathesalexander impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT heinenandre impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT hollmannmarkusw impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT huhnragnar impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning