Cargando…
Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30901956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030396 |
_version_ | 1783410655751045120 |
---|---|
author | Bunte, Sebastian Lill, Tobias Falk, Maximilian Stroethoff, Martin Raupach, Annika Mathes, Alexander Heinen, André Hollmann, Markus W. Huhn, Ragnar |
author_facet | Bunte, Sebastian Lill, Tobias Falk, Maximilian Stroethoff, Martin Raupach, Annika Mathes, Alexander Heinen, André Hollmann, Markus W. Huhn, Ragnar |
author_sort | Bunte, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 μM), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 μM) or levosimendan (0.3 μM) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 ± 9%, Prop-Con: 56 ± 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 ± 8%, Dex-Con: 53 ± 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 ± 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 ± 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 ± 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 ± 7%; p < 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 ± 6%; p < 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 ± 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6462902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64629022019-04-19 Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning Bunte, Sebastian Lill, Tobias Falk, Maximilian Stroethoff, Martin Raupach, Annika Mathes, Alexander Heinen, André Hollmann, Markus W. Huhn, Ragnar J Clin Med Article Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 μM), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 μM) or levosimendan (0.3 μM) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 ± 9%, Prop-Con: 56 ± 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 ± 8%, Dex-Con: 53 ± 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 ± 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 ± 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 ± 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 ± 7%; p < 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 ± 6%; p < 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 ± 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning. MDPI 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6462902/ /pubmed/30901956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030396 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bunte, Sebastian Lill, Tobias Falk, Maximilian Stroethoff, Martin Raupach, Annika Mathes, Alexander Heinen, André Hollmann, Markus W. Huhn, Ragnar Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title | Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_full | Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_fullStr | Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_short | Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_sort | impact of anesthetics on cardioprotection induced by pharmacological preconditioning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30901956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buntesebastian impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT lilltobias impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT falkmaximilian impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT stroethoffmartin impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT raupachannika impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT mathesalexander impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT heinenandre impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT hollmannmarkusw impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT huhnragnar impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning |