Cargando…

Intermetallic Differences at CdS–Metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au) Interfaces: From Single-Atom to Subnanometer Metal Clusters

[Image: see text] Metal co-catalysts tipped at a photocatalyst surface form a crucial component in the nanoheterostructures designed for the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. To examine the intermetallic differences and size effects at these interfaces, we use spin-polarized density functi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, S. S., van Huis, M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6463539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02319
_version_ 1783410770190532608
author Gupta, S. S.
van Huis, M. A.
author_facet Gupta, S. S.
van Huis, M. A.
author_sort Gupta, S. S.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Metal co-catalysts tipped at a photocatalyst surface form a crucial component in the nanoheterostructures designed for the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. To examine the intermetallic differences and size effects at these interfaces, we use spin-polarized density functional theory to study single-atom, 13-atom, and 55-atom cluster depositions of Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au on the CdS(101̅0) surface. For the single metal atoms, the ground-state configuration was the same site for all of the elements. Analysis of the metal–CdS bonding and of the charge transfers revealed a Ni–Cd bonding complex leading to depletion of electronic charge at the Ni single atom and at deposited Ni clusters, in contrast to charge accumulation observed for the other three metals Pd, Pt, and Au. For scaling up sizes of the metal deposition, six subnanometer cluster types were selected over a wide range of cluster’s effective coordination number, and their interfaces were differentiated by charge redistributions, structure and adhesion energies, highest occupied molecular orbital–lowest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gaps, and Schottky barrier heights. Although all considered clusters are semiconducting in the gas phase, 9 out of 28 clusters became (semi)metallic after deposition on the CdS semiconductor surface. Intermetallic differences and common trends are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6463539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64635392019-04-16 Intermetallic Differences at CdS–Metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au) Interfaces: From Single-Atom to Subnanometer Metal Clusters Gupta, S. S. van Huis, M. A. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces [Image: see text] Metal co-catalysts tipped at a photocatalyst surface form a crucial component in the nanoheterostructures designed for the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. To examine the intermetallic differences and size effects at these interfaces, we use spin-polarized density functional theory to study single-atom, 13-atom, and 55-atom cluster depositions of Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au on the CdS(101̅0) surface. For the single metal atoms, the ground-state configuration was the same site for all of the elements. Analysis of the metal–CdS bonding and of the charge transfers revealed a Ni–Cd bonding complex leading to depletion of electronic charge at the Ni single atom and at deposited Ni clusters, in contrast to charge accumulation observed for the other three metals Pd, Pt, and Au. For scaling up sizes of the metal deposition, six subnanometer cluster types were selected over a wide range of cluster’s effective coordination number, and their interfaces were differentiated by charge redistributions, structure and adhesion energies, highest occupied molecular orbital–lowest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gaps, and Schottky barrier heights. Although all considered clusters are semiconducting in the gas phase, 9 out of 28 clusters became (semi)metallic after deposition on the CdS semiconductor surface. Intermetallic differences and common trends are discussed. American Chemical Society 2019-03-20 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6463539/ /pubmed/31001370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02319 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Gupta, S. S.
van Huis, M. A.
Intermetallic Differences at CdS–Metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au) Interfaces: From Single-Atom to Subnanometer Metal Clusters
title Intermetallic Differences at CdS–Metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au) Interfaces: From Single-Atom to Subnanometer Metal Clusters
title_full Intermetallic Differences at CdS–Metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au) Interfaces: From Single-Atom to Subnanometer Metal Clusters
title_fullStr Intermetallic Differences at CdS–Metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au) Interfaces: From Single-Atom to Subnanometer Metal Clusters
title_full_unstemmed Intermetallic Differences at CdS–Metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au) Interfaces: From Single-Atom to Subnanometer Metal Clusters
title_short Intermetallic Differences at CdS–Metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Au) Interfaces: From Single-Atom to Subnanometer Metal Clusters
title_sort intermetallic differences at cds–metal (ni, pd, pt, and au) interfaces: from single-atom to subnanometer metal clusters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6463539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02319
work_keys_str_mv AT guptass intermetallicdifferencesatcdsmetalnipdptandauinterfacesfromsingleatomtosubnanometermetalclusters
AT vanhuisma intermetallicdifferencesatcdsmetalnipdptandauinterfacesfromsingleatomtosubnanometermetalclusters