Cargando…

Using Population Health Measures to Evaluate the Environmental Burden of Cancer at the County Level

INTRODUCTION: Burden of disease is often defined by using epidemiologic measures. However, there may be latent aspects of disease burden that are not factored into these types of estimates. This study quantified environmental burden of disease by using population health indicators and exploratory fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Lia C., Barker, Lawrence E., Richardson, Lisa C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6464050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974072
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180530
_version_ 1783410826415177728
author Scott, Lia C.
Barker, Lawrence E.
Richardson, Lisa C.
author_facet Scott, Lia C.
Barker, Lawrence E.
Richardson, Lisa C.
author_sort Scott, Lia C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Burden of disease is often defined by using epidemiologic measures. However, there may be latent aspects of disease burden that are not factored into these types of estimates. This study quantified environmental burden of disease by using population health indicators and exploratory factor analysis at the county level across the United States. METHODS: Ninety-nine variables drawn from public use data sets from 2010 to 2016 were used to create a multifactor index — the burden index. We applied principal components analysis with promax rotation to allow the factors to correlate. Correlation coefficients for each factor and the outcome of interest, age-adjusted cancer death rate, were calculated. We used both unadjusted and adjusted linear regression techniques. RESULTS: The final additive county-level index included 9 factors that explained 68.3% of the variance in the counties and county equivalents. The burden index had a moderate association with the age-adjusted cancer death rates (r =.48, P <.001), and adjusted linear regression with all 9 factors explained 34% of the variance in the age-adjusted cancer death rate. Results were mapped, and the geographic distribution of both the burden index and age-adjusted cancer mortality were assessed. There are distinct geospatial patterns for both. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study show potential areas of need, as well as the importance of including environmental variables in the study of cancer etiology. Future studies can aim to validate these findings by quantifying burden as it relates to overall cancer mortality by using epidemiologic measures, along with other confirmatory statistical methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6464050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64640502019-04-24 Using Population Health Measures to Evaluate the Environmental Burden of Cancer at the County Level Scott, Lia C. Barker, Lawrence E. Richardson, Lisa C. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Burden of disease is often defined by using epidemiologic measures. However, there may be latent aspects of disease burden that are not factored into these types of estimates. This study quantified environmental burden of disease by using population health indicators and exploratory factor analysis at the county level across the United States. METHODS: Ninety-nine variables drawn from public use data sets from 2010 to 2016 were used to create a multifactor index — the burden index. We applied principal components analysis with promax rotation to allow the factors to correlate. Correlation coefficients for each factor and the outcome of interest, age-adjusted cancer death rate, were calculated. We used both unadjusted and adjusted linear regression techniques. RESULTS: The final additive county-level index included 9 factors that explained 68.3% of the variance in the counties and county equivalents. The burden index had a moderate association with the age-adjusted cancer death rates (r =.48, P <.001), and adjusted linear regression with all 9 factors explained 34% of the variance in the age-adjusted cancer death rate. Results were mapped, and the geographic distribution of both the burden index and age-adjusted cancer mortality were assessed. There are distinct geospatial patterns for both. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study show potential areas of need, as well as the importance of including environmental variables in the study of cancer etiology. Future studies can aim to validate these findings by quantifying burden as it relates to overall cancer mortality by using epidemiologic measures, along with other confirmatory statistical methods. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6464050/ /pubmed/30974072 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180530 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Scott, Lia C.
Barker, Lawrence E.
Richardson, Lisa C.
Using Population Health Measures to Evaluate the Environmental Burden of Cancer at the County Level
title Using Population Health Measures to Evaluate the Environmental Burden of Cancer at the County Level
title_full Using Population Health Measures to Evaluate the Environmental Burden of Cancer at the County Level
title_fullStr Using Population Health Measures to Evaluate the Environmental Burden of Cancer at the County Level
title_full_unstemmed Using Population Health Measures to Evaluate the Environmental Burden of Cancer at the County Level
title_short Using Population Health Measures to Evaluate the Environmental Burden of Cancer at the County Level
title_sort using population health measures to evaluate the environmental burden of cancer at the county level
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6464050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974072
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180530
work_keys_str_mv AT scottliac usingpopulationhealthmeasurestoevaluatetheenvironmentalburdenofcanceratthecountylevel
AT barkerlawrencee usingpopulationhealthmeasurestoevaluatetheenvironmentalburdenofcanceratthecountylevel
AT richardsonlisac usingpopulationhealthmeasurestoevaluatetheenvironmentalburdenofcanceratthecountylevel