Cargando…

Online Module to Improve Emergency Department Observation Unit Practice

INTRODUCTION: The emergency department (ED) observation unit has become a unique practice opportunity to liberate inpatient capacity in the United States. Substantial variations in clinical practice and level of comfort among ED providers existed in a large health care system. We aimed to study the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sangil, Young, Ian, Colletti, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6464449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008203
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10423
_version_ 1783410862779793408
author Lee, Sangil
Young, Ian
Colletti, James
author_facet Lee, Sangil
Young, Ian
Colletti, James
author_sort Lee, Sangil
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The emergency department (ED) observation unit has become a unique practice opportunity to liberate inpatient capacity in the United States. Substantial variations in clinical practice and level of comfort among ED providers existed in a large health care system. We aimed to study the effectiveness of an educational module targeted for emergency medicine providers. METHODS: We developed a 20-minute online module including pretest, learning module, and posttest. The format consisted of Likert-scale (1 = least comfortable, 5 = most comfortable), true-or-false, and multiple-choice questions. The learning module contained slides, script, and figures describing management strategy for commonly encountered conditions in the observation unit. The institutional review board granted exempted review. Pre- and posttest scores were evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and a p value of less than .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants completed the pretest, with a mean score of 63.8 (SD = 19.3), and 14 participants completed the posttest, with a mean score of 87.9 (SD = 9.7; p = .0001). Eight participants responded to a follow-up survey, a response rate of 57%. Responses demonstrated that levels of provider comfort in selection of observation (M = 4.3, SD = 1.5), choice of stress test for chest pain (M = 4.3, SD = 1.0), asthma management (M = 4.1, SD = 1.0), anaphylaxis care (M = 4.1, SD = 1.4), and documentation (M = 4.3, SD = 0.9) were high. DISCUSSION: An online learning module can be useful to enhance the knowledge of observation medicine among emergency medicine providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6464449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Association of American Medical Colleges
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64644492019-04-19 Online Module to Improve Emergency Department Observation Unit Practice Lee, Sangil Young, Ian Colletti, James MedEdPORTAL Original Publication INTRODUCTION: The emergency department (ED) observation unit has become a unique practice opportunity to liberate inpatient capacity in the United States. Substantial variations in clinical practice and level of comfort among ED providers existed in a large health care system. We aimed to study the effectiveness of an educational module targeted for emergency medicine providers. METHODS: We developed a 20-minute online module including pretest, learning module, and posttest. The format consisted of Likert-scale (1 = least comfortable, 5 = most comfortable), true-or-false, and multiple-choice questions. The learning module contained slides, script, and figures describing management strategy for commonly encountered conditions in the observation unit. The institutional review board granted exempted review. Pre- and posttest scores were evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and a p value of less than .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants completed the pretest, with a mean score of 63.8 (SD = 19.3), and 14 participants completed the posttest, with a mean score of 87.9 (SD = 9.7; p = .0001). Eight participants responded to a follow-up survey, a response rate of 57%. Responses demonstrated that levels of provider comfort in selection of observation (M = 4.3, SD = 1.5), choice of stress test for chest pain (M = 4.3, SD = 1.0), asthma management (M = 4.1, SD = 1.0), anaphylaxis care (M = 4.1, SD = 1.4), and documentation (M = 4.3, SD = 0.9) were high. DISCUSSION: An online learning module can be useful to enhance the knowledge of observation medicine among emergency medicine providers. Association of American Medical Colleges 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6464449/ /pubmed/31008203 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10423 Text en Copyright © 2016 Lee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) license.
spellingShingle Original Publication
Lee, Sangil
Young, Ian
Colletti, James
Online Module to Improve Emergency Department Observation Unit Practice
title Online Module to Improve Emergency Department Observation Unit Practice
title_full Online Module to Improve Emergency Department Observation Unit Practice
title_fullStr Online Module to Improve Emergency Department Observation Unit Practice
title_full_unstemmed Online Module to Improve Emergency Department Observation Unit Practice
title_short Online Module to Improve Emergency Department Observation Unit Practice
title_sort online module to improve emergency department observation unit practice
topic Original Publication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6464449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008203
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10423
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangil onlinemoduletoimproveemergencydepartmentobservationunitpractice
AT youngian onlinemoduletoimproveemergencydepartmentobservationunitpractice
AT collettijames onlinemoduletoimproveemergencydepartmentobservationunitpractice