Cargando…

Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid?

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines were updated to recommend that nonvigorous infants delivered through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) do not require routine intubation and tracheal suction. OBJECTIVE: Explore the implications of 2015 NRP guidelines on d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldhafeeri, Fahad Muqdhib, Aldhafiri, Fawaz Mayouf, Bamehriz, Maha, Al-Wassia, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6464672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955017
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2019.87
_version_ 1783410877835247616
author Aldhafeeri, Fahad Muqdhib
Aldhafiri, Fawaz Mayouf
Bamehriz, Maha
Al-Wassia, Heidi
author_facet Aldhafeeri, Fahad Muqdhib
Aldhafiri, Fawaz Mayouf
Bamehriz, Maha
Al-Wassia, Heidi
author_sort Aldhafeeri, Fahad Muqdhib
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines were updated to recommend that nonvigorous infants delivered through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) do not require routine intubation and tracheal suction. OBJECTIVE: Explore the implications of 2015 NRP guidelines on delivery room management and outcome of infants born through MSAF. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital (KAUH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All term (≥37 weeks) infants born in KAUH through MSAF between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the date of birth: period 1 (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016), before the implementation of the new NRP guidelines; period 2 (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017), after the implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of infants born through MSAF. SAMPLE SIZE: 420 infants. RESULTS: A majority of infants (n=261) were born in period 1 and 159 after in period 2. No differences were found in the booking status of mothers, cesarean section rate, and number of deliveries attended by physicians between the 2 cohorts. Infants in both cohorts were of similar gestational age, birth weight, and gender. A nonsignificant lower rate of intubation at birth (2.3% vs 0.6%), admission to neonatal intensive care unit (3.8% vs 3.1%), and meconium aspiration syndrome (1.5% vs 0.6%) were found in period 2 compared with period 1. Only 1 infant died in period 1. CONCLUSION: After the implementation of 2015 NRP guidelines, fewer infants were intubated at birth for MSAF. No difference was observed in the rate of associated morbidities and mortality. LIMITATIONS: A single-center retrospective study of misclassification bias because some of the medical staff started practicing the new guidelines before the official implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6464672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64646722019-04-26 Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid? Aldhafeeri, Fahad Muqdhib Aldhafiri, Fawaz Mayouf Bamehriz, Maha Al-Wassia, Heidi Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines were updated to recommend that nonvigorous infants delivered through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) do not require routine intubation and tracheal suction. OBJECTIVE: Explore the implications of 2015 NRP guidelines on delivery room management and outcome of infants born through MSAF. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital (KAUH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All term (≥37 weeks) infants born in KAUH through MSAF between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the date of birth: period 1 (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016), before the implementation of the new NRP guidelines; period 2 (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017), after the implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of infants born through MSAF. SAMPLE SIZE: 420 infants. RESULTS: A majority of infants (n=261) were born in period 1 and 159 after in period 2. No differences were found in the booking status of mothers, cesarean section rate, and number of deliveries attended by physicians between the 2 cohorts. Infants in both cohorts were of similar gestational age, birth weight, and gender. A nonsignificant lower rate of intubation at birth (2.3% vs 0.6%), admission to neonatal intensive care unit (3.8% vs 3.1%), and meconium aspiration syndrome (1.5% vs 0.6%) were found in period 2 compared with period 1. Only 1 infant died in period 1. CONCLUSION: After the implementation of 2015 NRP guidelines, fewer infants were intubated at birth for MSAF. No difference was observed in the rate of associated morbidities and mortality. LIMITATIONS: A single-center retrospective study of misclassification bias because some of the medical staff started practicing the new guidelines before the official implementation. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2019 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6464672/ /pubmed/30955017 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2019.87 Text en Copyright © 2019, Annals of Saudi Medicine This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). The details of which can be accessed at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Aldhafeeri, Fahad Muqdhib
Aldhafiri, Fawaz Mayouf
Bamehriz, Maha
Al-Wassia, Heidi
Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid?
title Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid?
title_full Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid?
title_fullStr Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid?
title_full_unstemmed Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid?
title_short Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid?
title_sort have the 2015 neonatal resuscitation program guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6464672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955017
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2019.87
work_keys_str_mv AT aldhafeerifahadmuqdhib havethe2015neonatalresuscitationprogramguidelineschangedthemanagementandoutcomeofinfantsbornthroughmeconiumstainedamnioticfluid
AT aldhafirifawazmayouf havethe2015neonatalresuscitationprogramguidelineschangedthemanagementandoutcomeofinfantsbornthroughmeconiumstainedamnioticfluid
AT bamehrizmaha havethe2015neonatalresuscitationprogramguidelineschangedthemanagementandoutcomeofinfantsbornthroughmeconiumstainedamnioticfluid
AT alwassiaheidi havethe2015neonatalresuscitationprogramguidelineschangedthemanagementandoutcomeofinfantsbornthroughmeconiumstainedamnioticfluid