Cargando…

Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response

Cardiac fibrosis is associated with heart failure and poor prognosis. Fibrosis biomarkers have been poorly evaluated as a tool to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response generating conflicting results. The present study assessed the predictive value of cardiac fibrosis biomarkers on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Massoullié, Grégoire, Sapin, Vincent, Ploux, Sylvain, Rossignol, Patrick, Mulliez, Aurélien, Jean, Frédéric, Marie, Pierre-Yves, Merlin, Charles, Pereira, Bruno, Andronache, Marius, Motreff, Pascal, Chabin, Xavier, Sellal, Jean-Marc, Citron, Bernard, Lusson, Jean-René, Vorilhon, Charles, Clerfond, Guillaume, Bordachar, Pierre, Zannad, Faiez, Eschalier, Romain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42468-4
_version_ 1783410916871634944
author Massoullié, Grégoire
Sapin, Vincent
Ploux, Sylvain
Rossignol, Patrick
Mulliez, Aurélien
Jean, Frédéric
Marie, Pierre-Yves
Merlin, Charles
Pereira, Bruno
Andronache, Marius
Motreff, Pascal
Chabin, Xavier
Sellal, Jean-Marc
Citron, Bernard
Lusson, Jean-René
Vorilhon, Charles
Clerfond, Guillaume
Bordachar, Pierre
Zannad, Faiez
Eschalier, Romain
author_facet Massoullié, Grégoire
Sapin, Vincent
Ploux, Sylvain
Rossignol, Patrick
Mulliez, Aurélien
Jean, Frédéric
Marie, Pierre-Yves
Merlin, Charles
Pereira, Bruno
Andronache, Marius
Motreff, Pascal
Chabin, Xavier
Sellal, Jean-Marc
Citron, Bernard
Lusson, Jean-René
Vorilhon, Charles
Clerfond, Guillaume
Bordachar, Pierre
Zannad, Faiez
Eschalier, Romain
author_sort Massoullié, Grégoire
collection PubMed
description Cardiac fibrosis is associated with heart failure and poor prognosis. Fibrosis biomarkers have been poorly evaluated as a tool to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response generating conflicting results. The present study assessed the predictive value of cardiac fibrosis biomarkers on CRT response. Patients underwent clinical examination, echocardiography and blood fibrosis biomarker evaluation prior to CRT implantation. At six months, a positive response to CRT was defined by a composite endpoint of no death or hospitalization for heart failure, and presence of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (decrease in LV end-systolic volume ≥15%). Sixty patients were included in a multicenter study. At 6 months, 38 were positive responders to CRT and reached the response criteria (63%). Compared to non-responders, CRT responders displayed lower concentration levels of the fibrosis biomarkers procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide [PICP 135[99–166] ng/ml vs. 179[142–226]ng/ml, p = 0.001)] and procollagen type III N-terminal propeptide [PIIINP 5.50[3.66–8.96] ng/ml vs. 8.01[5.01–11.86]ng/ml, p = 0.014)] at baseline. In multivariate analysis, a PICP ≤ 163 ng/ml was associated with a positive CRT response [OR = 7.8(1.3–46.7), p = 0.023] independently of the presence of LBBB, QRS duration, LV lead position or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Altogether, the present findings show that a lower degree of cardiac fibrosis is associated with a positive response after CRT implantation. PICP evaluation before CRT implantation could help improve patient selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6465309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64653092019-04-18 Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response Massoullié, Grégoire Sapin, Vincent Ploux, Sylvain Rossignol, Patrick Mulliez, Aurélien Jean, Frédéric Marie, Pierre-Yves Merlin, Charles Pereira, Bruno Andronache, Marius Motreff, Pascal Chabin, Xavier Sellal, Jean-Marc Citron, Bernard Lusson, Jean-René Vorilhon, Charles Clerfond, Guillaume Bordachar, Pierre Zannad, Faiez Eschalier, Romain Sci Rep Article Cardiac fibrosis is associated with heart failure and poor prognosis. Fibrosis biomarkers have been poorly evaluated as a tool to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response generating conflicting results. The present study assessed the predictive value of cardiac fibrosis biomarkers on CRT response. Patients underwent clinical examination, echocardiography and blood fibrosis biomarker evaluation prior to CRT implantation. At six months, a positive response to CRT was defined by a composite endpoint of no death or hospitalization for heart failure, and presence of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (decrease in LV end-systolic volume ≥15%). Sixty patients were included in a multicenter study. At 6 months, 38 were positive responders to CRT and reached the response criteria (63%). Compared to non-responders, CRT responders displayed lower concentration levels of the fibrosis biomarkers procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide [PICP 135[99–166] ng/ml vs. 179[142–226]ng/ml, p = 0.001)] and procollagen type III N-terminal propeptide [PIIINP 5.50[3.66–8.96] ng/ml vs. 8.01[5.01–11.86]ng/ml, p = 0.014)] at baseline. In multivariate analysis, a PICP ≤ 163 ng/ml was associated with a positive CRT response [OR = 7.8(1.3–46.7), p = 0.023] independently of the presence of LBBB, QRS duration, LV lead position or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Altogether, the present findings show that a lower degree of cardiac fibrosis is associated with a positive response after CRT implantation. PICP evaluation before CRT implantation could help improve patient selection. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6465309/ /pubmed/30988339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42468-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Massoullié, Grégoire
Sapin, Vincent
Ploux, Sylvain
Rossignol, Patrick
Mulliez, Aurélien
Jean, Frédéric
Marie, Pierre-Yves
Merlin, Charles
Pereira, Bruno
Andronache, Marius
Motreff, Pascal
Chabin, Xavier
Sellal, Jean-Marc
Citron, Bernard
Lusson, Jean-René
Vorilhon, Charles
Clerfond, Guillaume
Bordachar, Pierre
Zannad, Faiez
Eschalier, Romain
Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response
title Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response
title_full Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response
title_fullStr Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response
title_full_unstemmed Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response
title_short Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response
title_sort low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42468-4
work_keys_str_mv AT massoulliegregoire lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT sapinvincent lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT plouxsylvain lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT rossignolpatrick lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT mulliezaurelien lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT jeanfrederic lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT mariepierreyves lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT merlincharles lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT pereirabruno lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT andronachemarius lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT motreffpascal lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT chabinxavier lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT sellaljeanmarc lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT citronbernard lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT lussonjeanrene lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT vorilhoncharles lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT clerfondguillaume lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT bordacharpierre lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT zannadfaiez lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse
AT eschalierromain lowfibrosisbiomarkerlevelspredictcardiacresynchronizationtherapyresponse