Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears

BACKGROUND: Transtibial pullout repair for posterior meniscus root tear is widely performed to restore meniscal function. However, it is sometimes technically difficult to pass the suture through the posterior medial meniscus root in narrow joint space. To address this limitation, a new suture techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okimura, Shinichiro, Mae, Tatsuo, Tachibana, Yuta, Iuchi, Ryo, Nakata, Ken, Yamashita, Toshihiko, Shino, Konsei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30989353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0186-4
_version_ 1783410933731688448
author Okimura, Shinichiro
Mae, Tatsuo
Tachibana, Yuta
Iuchi, Ryo
Nakata, Ken
Yamashita, Toshihiko
Shino, Konsei
author_facet Okimura, Shinichiro
Mae, Tatsuo
Tachibana, Yuta
Iuchi, Ryo
Nakata, Ken
Yamashita, Toshihiko
Shino, Konsei
author_sort Okimura, Shinichiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transtibial pullout repair for posterior meniscus root tear is widely performed to restore meniscal function. However, it is sometimes technically difficult to pass the suture through the posterior medial meniscus root in narrow joint space. To address this limitation, a new suture technique using an all-inside meniscal suture device through the tibial tunnel was proposed. The purpose of the present study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a meniscus-suture construct prepared using an all-inside meniscal suture device and those of the construct prepared using conventional suture techniques. METHODS: A total of 18 fresh-frozen porcine medial menisci were used and randomly divided into three groups according to the type of suturing technique applied. Three suturing methods were evaluated: suturing with all-inside meniscal suture device, single simple suture, and double simple sutures. All specimens were subjected to cyclic loading of 300 cycles followed by a load-to-failure test. The displacement after cyclic loading, the ultimate failure load, and the mode of failure were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference among the three suturing techniques regarding both displacement after cyclic loading and ultimate failure load. Suture breakage was the most common failure mode in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical properties of meniscus-suture construct with the all-inside meniscal suture device were equivalent to those obtained using conventional suture techniques. Our results suggest that pullout repair using the all-inside meniscal suture device through the tibial tunnel could serve as an alternative suture technique for the repair of posterior meniscus root tears.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6465386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64653862019-05-03 Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears Okimura, Shinichiro Mae, Tatsuo Tachibana, Yuta Iuchi, Ryo Nakata, Ken Yamashita, Toshihiko Shino, Konsei J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: Transtibial pullout repair for posterior meniscus root tear is widely performed to restore meniscal function. However, it is sometimes technically difficult to pass the suture through the posterior medial meniscus root in narrow joint space. To address this limitation, a new suture technique using an all-inside meniscal suture device through the tibial tunnel was proposed. The purpose of the present study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a meniscus-suture construct prepared using an all-inside meniscal suture device and those of the construct prepared using conventional suture techniques. METHODS: A total of 18 fresh-frozen porcine medial menisci were used and randomly divided into three groups according to the type of suturing technique applied. Three suturing methods were evaluated: suturing with all-inside meniscal suture device, single simple suture, and double simple sutures. All specimens were subjected to cyclic loading of 300 cycles followed by a load-to-failure test. The displacement after cyclic loading, the ultimate failure load, and the mode of failure were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference among the three suturing techniques regarding both displacement after cyclic loading and ultimate failure load. Suture breakage was the most common failure mode in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical properties of meniscus-suture construct with the all-inside meniscal suture device were equivalent to those obtained using conventional suture techniques. Our results suggest that pullout repair using the all-inside meniscal suture device through the tibial tunnel could serve as an alternative suture technique for the repair of posterior meniscus root tears. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6465386/ /pubmed/30989353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0186-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Okimura, Shinichiro
Mae, Tatsuo
Tachibana, Yuta
Iuchi, Ryo
Nakata, Ken
Yamashita, Toshihiko
Shino, Konsei
Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears
title Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears
title_full Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears
title_short Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears
title_sort biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30989353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0186-4
work_keys_str_mv AT okimurashinichiro biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscussutureconstructsforpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottears
AT maetatsuo biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscussutureconstructsforpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottears
AT tachibanayuta biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscussutureconstructsforpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottears
AT iuchiryo biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscussutureconstructsforpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottears
AT nakataken biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscussutureconstructsforpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottears
AT yamashitatoshihiko biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscussutureconstructsforpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottears
AT shinokonsei biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscussutureconstructsforpulloutrepairofmedialmeniscusposteriorroottears