Cargando…

Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures

The accuracy of flow cytometric (FCM) quantifications of microbial populations in sediments varies with FCM settings, cell extraction and staining protocols, as well as sample types. In the present study, we improve the accuracy of FCM for enumerating microorganisms inhabiting diverse lake and marin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Longhui, Fiskal, Annika, Han, Xingguo, Dubois, Nathalie, Bernasconi, Stefano Michele, Lever, Mark Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00720
_version_ 1783410963541655552
author Deng, Longhui
Fiskal, Annika
Han, Xingguo
Dubois, Nathalie
Bernasconi, Stefano Michele
Lever, Mark Alexander
author_facet Deng, Longhui
Fiskal, Annika
Han, Xingguo
Dubois, Nathalie
Bernasconi, Stefano Michele
Lever, Mark Alexander
author_sort Deng, Longhui
collection PubMed
description The accuracy of flow cytometric (FCM) quantifications of microbial populations in sediments varies with FCM settings, cell extraction and staining protocols, as well as sample types. In the present study, we improve the accuracy of FCM for enumerating microorganisms inhabiting diverse lake and marine sediment types based on extensive tests with FCM settings, extraction buffer chemical compositions, cell separation methods, and staining procedures. Tests on the FCM settings, (e.g., acquisition time, rates of events) and salinity of extraction solutions show minor impacts on FCM enumerations and yields of cell extraction, respectively. Existing methods involving hydrofluoric acid (HF) treatment to release sediment-attached cells into solution prove effective on both marine and freshwater samples. Yet, different staining techniques (direct staining of cell extracts, staining of membrane-filtered cell extracts) produce clear differences in cell number estimates. We demonstrate that, while labor-intensive membrane-staining generates high cell staining efficiency and accurate cell counts that are consistent across FCM and epifluorescence microscopy-based (EFM) quantification methods, accurate cell counts determined by more time- and labor-efficient direct staining require consideration of dye concentration, sample dilution, and lithology. Yet, good agreement between the two staining methods can be achieved through sample-specific adjustments of dye concentrations and sample dilutions during direct staining. We thus present a complete protocol for FCM-based cell quantification, that includes all steps from the initial sample fixation to the final enumeration, with recommendations for buffer compositions, direct and membrane-based staining procedures, and the final FCM assay. This protocol is versatile, accurate, and reliable, as is evident from good agreement with cell quantifications by EFM and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of 16S rRNA genes across a wide range of sedimentary sample types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6465615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64656152019-04-25 Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures Deng, Longhui Fiskal, Annika Han, Xingguo Dubois, Nathalie Bernasconi, Stefano Michele Lever, Mark Alexander Front Microbiol Microbiology The accuracy of flow cytometric (FCM) quantifications of microbial populations in sediments varies with FCM settings, cell extraction and staining protocols, as well as sample types. In the present study, we improve the accuracy of FCM for enumerating microorganisms inhabiting diverse lake and marine sediment types based on extensive tests with FCM settings, extraction buffer chemical compositions, cell separation methods, and staining procedures. Tests on the FCM settings, (e.g., acquisition time, rates of events) and salinity of extraction solutions show minor impacts on FCM enumerations and yields of cell extraction, respectively. Existing methods involving hydrofluoric acid (HF) treatment to release sediment-attached cells into solution prove effective on both marine and freshwater samples. Yet, different staining techniques (direct staining of cell extracts, staining of membrane-filtered cell extracts) produce clear differences in cell number estimates. We demonstrate that, while labor-intensive membrane-staining generates high cell staining efficiency and accurate cell counts that are consistent across FCM and epifluorescence microscopy-based (EFM) quantification methods, accurate cell counts determined by more time- and labor-efficient direct staining require consideration of dye concentration, sample dilution, and lithology. Yet, good agreement between the two staining methods can be achieved through sample-specific adjustments of dye concentrations and sample dilutions during direct staining. We thus present a complete protocol for FCM-based cell quantification, that includes all steps from the initial sample fixation to the final enumeration, with recommendations for buffer compositions, direct and membrane-based staining procedures, and the final FCM assay. This protocol is versatile, accurate, and reliable, as is evident from good agreement with cell quantifications by EFM and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of 16S rRNA genes across a wide range of sedimentary sample types. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6465615/ /pubmed/31024498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00720 Text en Copyright © 2019 Deng, Fiskal, Han, Dubois, Bernasconi and Lever. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Deng, Longhui
Fiskal, Annika
Han, Xingguo
Dubois, Nathalie
Bernasconi, Stefano Michele
Lever, Mark Alexander
Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures
title Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures
title_full Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures
title_fullStr Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures
title_short Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures
title_sort improving the accuracy of flow cytometric quantification of microbial populations in sediments: importance of cell staining procedures
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00720
work_keys_str_mv AT denglonghui improvingtheaccuracyofflowcytometricquantificationofmicrobialpopulationsinsedimentsimportanceofcellstainingprocedures
AT fiskalannika improvingtheaccuracyofflowcytometricquantificationofmicrobialpopulationsinsedimentsimportanceofcellstainingprocedures
AT hanxingguo improvingtheaccuracyofflowcytometricquantificationofmicrobialpopulationsinsedimentsimportanceofcellstainingprocedures
AT duboisnathalie improvingtheaccuracyofflowcytometricquantificationofmicrobialpopulationsinsedimentsimportanceofcellstainingprocedures
AT bernasconistefanomichele improvingtheaccuracyofflowcytometricquantificationofmicrobialpopulationsinsedimentsimportanceofcellstainingprocedures
AT levermarkalexander improvingtheaccuracyofflowcytometricquantificationofmicrobialpopulationsinsedimentsimportanceofcellstainingprocedures