Cargando…
Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing
BACKGROUND: Detailed analysis of imprinting center (IC) defects in individuals with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is not readily available beyond chromosomal microarray (MA) analysis, and such testing is important for a more accurate diagnosis and recurrence risks. This is the first feasibility study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30793526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.575 |
_version_ | 1783410974876762112 |
---|---|
author | Hartin, Samantha N. Hossain, Waheeda A. Francis, David Godler, David E. Barkataki, Sangjucta Butler, Merlin G. |
author_facet | Hartin, Samantha N. Hossain, Waheeda A. Francis, David Godler, David E. Barkataki, Sangjucta Butler, Merlin G. |
author_sort | Hartin, Samantha N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Detailed analysis of imprinting center (IC) defects in individuals with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is not readily available beyond chromosomal microarray (MA) analysis, and such testing is important for a more accurate diagnosis and recurrence risks. This is the first feasibility study of newly developed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) examining DNA copy number differences in the PWS IC region of those with IC defects. METHODS: The study cohort included 17 individuals without 15q11‐q13 deletions or maternal disomy but with IC defects as determined by genotype analysis showing biparental inheritance. Seven sets of parents and two healthy, unrelated controls were also analyzed. RESULTS: Copy number differences were distinguished by comparing the number of positive droplets detected by IC probes to those from a chromosome 15 reference probe, GABRβ3. The ddPCR findings were compared to results from other methods including MA, and whole‐exome sequencing (WES) with 100% concordance. The study also estimated the frequency of IC microdeletions and identified gene variants by WES that may impact phenotypes including CPT2 and NTRK1 genes. CONCLUSION: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction is a cost‐effective method that can be used to confirm the presence of microdeletions in PWS with impact on genetic counseling and recurrence risks for families. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6465664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64656642019-04-23 Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing Hartin, Samantha N. Hossain, Waheeda A. Francis, David Godler, David E. Barkataki, Sangjucta Butler, Merlin G. Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Detailed analysis of imprinting center (IC) defects in individuals with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is not readily available beyond chromosomal microarray (MA) analysis, and such testing is important for a more accurate diagnosis and recurrence risks. This is the first feasibility study of newly developed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) examining DNA copy number differences in the PWS IC region of those with IC defects. METHODS: The study cohort included 17 individuals without 15q11‐q13 deletions or maternal disomy but with IC defects as determined by genotype analysis showing biparental inheritance. Seven sets of parents and two healthy, unrelated controls were also analyzed. RESULTS: Copy number differences were distinguished by comparing the number of positive droplets detected by IC probes to those from a chromosome 15 reference probe, GABRβ3. The ddPCR findings were compared to results from other methods including MA, and whole‐exome sequencing (WES) with 100% concordance. The study also estimated the frequency of IC microdeletions and identified gene variants by WES that may impact phenotypes including CPT2 and NTRK1 genes. CONCLUSION: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction is a cost‐effective method that can be used to confirm the presence of microdeletions in PWS with impact on genetic counseling and recurrence risks for families. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6465664/ /pubmed/30793526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.575 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hartin, Samantha N. Hossain, Waheeda A. Francis, David Godler, David E. Barkataki, Sangjucta Butler, Merlin G. Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing |
title | Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing |
title_full | Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing |
title_short | Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing |
title_sort | analysis of the prader–willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital pcr and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30793526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartinsamanthan analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing AT hossainwaheedaa analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing AT francisdavid analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing AT godlerdavide analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing AT barkatakisangjucta analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing AT butlermerling analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing |