Cargando…

Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing

BACKGROUND: Detailed analysis of imprinting center (IC) defects in individuals with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is not readily available beyond chromosomal microarray (MA) analysis, and such testing is important for a more accurate diagnosis and recurrence risks. This is the first feasibility study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartin, Samantha N., Hossain, Waheeda A., Francis, David, Godler, David E., Barkataki, Sangjucta, Butler, Merlin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30793526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.575
_version_ 1783410974876762112
author Hartin, Samantha N.
Hossain, Waheeda A.
Francis, David
Godler, David E.
Barkataki, Sangjucta
Butler, Merlin G.
author_facet Hartin, Samantha N.
Hossain, Waheeda A.
Francis, David
Godler, David E.
Barkataki, Sangjucta
Butler, Merlin G.
author_sort Hartin, Samantha N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Detailed analysis of imprinting center (IC) defects in individuals with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is not readily available beyond chromosomal microarray (MA) analysis, and such testing is important for a more accurate diagnosis and recurrence risks. This is the first feasibility study of newly developed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) examining DNA copy number differences in the PWS IC region of those with IC defects. METHODS: The study cohort included 17 individuals without 15q11‐q13 deletions or maternal disomy but with IC defects as determined by genotype analysis showing biparental inheritance. Seven sets of parents and two healthy, unrelated controls were also analyzed. RESULTS: Copy number differences were distinguished by comparing the number of positive droplets detected by IC probes to those from a chromosome 15 reference probe, GABRβ3. The ddPCR findings were compared to results from other methods including MA, and whole‐exome sequencing (WES) with 100% concordance. The study also estimated the frequency of IC microdeletions and identified gene variants by WES that may impact phenotypes including CPT2 and NTRK1 genes. CONCLUSION: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction is a cost‐effective method that can be used to confirm the presence of microdeletions in PWS with impact on genetic counseling and recurrence risks for families.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6465664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64656642019-04-23 Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing Hartin, Samantha N. Hossain, Waheeda A. Francis, David Godler, David E. Barkataki, Sangjucta Butler, Merlin G. Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Detailed analysis of imprinting center (IC) defects in individuals with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is not readily available beyond chromosomal microarray (MA) analysis, and such testing is important for a more accurate diagnosis and recurrence risks. This is the first feasibility study of newly developed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) examining DNA copy number differences in the PWS IC region of those with IC defects. METHODS: The study cohort included 17 individuals without 15q11‐q13 deletions or maternal disomy but with IC defects as determined by genotype analysis showing biparental inheritance. Seven sets of parents and two healthy, unrelated controls were also analyzed. RESULTS: Copy number differences were distinguished by comparing the number of positive droplets detected by IC probes to those from a chromosome 15 reference probe, GABRβ3. The ddPCR findings were compared to results from other methods including MA, and whole‐exome sequencing (WES) with 100% concordance. The study also estimated the frequency of IC microdeletions and identified gene variants by WES that may impact phenotypes including CPT2 and NTRK1 genes. CONCLUSION: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction is a cost‐effective method that can be used to confirm the presence of microdeletions in PWS with impact on genetic counseling and recurrence risks for families. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6465664/ /pubmed/30793526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.575 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hartin, Samantha N.
Hossain, Waheeda A.
Francis, David
Godler, David E.
Barkataki, Sangjucta
Butler, Merlin G.
Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing
title Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing
title_full Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing
title_fullStr Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing
title_short Analysis of the Prader–Willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital PCR and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing
title_sort analysis of the prader–willi syndrome imprinting center using droplet digital pcr and next‐generation whole‐exome sequencing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30793526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.575
work_keys_str_mv AT hartinsamanthan analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing
AT hossainwaheedaa analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing
AT francisdavid analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing
AT godlerdavide analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing
AT barkatakisangjucta analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing
AT butlermerling analysisofthepraderwillisyndromeimprintingcenterusingdropletdigitalpcrandnextgenerationwholeexomesequencing