Cargando…
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
Foam rolling is thought to improve muscular performance and flexibility as well as to alleviate muscle fatigue and soreness. For this reason, foam rolling has become a popular intervention in all kinds of sport settings used to increase the efficiency of training or competition preparation as well a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00376 |
_version_ | 1783410988375080960 |
---|---|
author | Wiewelhove, Thimo Döweling, Alexander Schneider, Christoph Hottenrott, Laura Meyer, Tim Kellmann, Michael Pfeiffer, Mark Ferrauti, Alexander |
author_facet | Wiewelhove, Thimo Döweling, Alexander Schneider, Christoph Hottenrott, Laura Meyer, Tim Kellmann, Michael Pfeiffer, Mark Ferrauti, Alexander |
author_sort | Wiewelhove, Thimo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Foam rolling is thought to improve muscular performance and flexibility as well as to alleviate muscle fatigue and soreness. For this reason, foam rolling has become a popular intervention in all kinds of sport settings used to increase the efficiency of training or competition preparation as well as to speed post-exercise recovery. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of foam rolling applied before (pre-rolling as a warm-up activity) and after (post-rolling as a recovery strategy) exercise on sprint, jump, and strength performance as well as on flexibility and muscle pain outcomes and to identify whether self-massage with a foam roller or a roller massager is more effective. A comprehensive and structured literature search was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro, and Cochrane Library search engines. Twenty-one studies were located that met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen studies used pre-rolling, while seven studies used post-rolling. Pre-rolling resulted in a small improvement in sprint performance (+0.7%, g = 0.28) and flexibility (+4.0%, g = 0.34), whereas the effect on jump (−1.9%, g = 0.09) and strength performance (+1.8%, g = 0.12) was negligible. Post-rolling slightly attenuated exercise-induced decreases in sprint (+3.1%, g = 0.34) and strength performance (+3.9 %, g = 0.21). It also reduced muscle pain perception (+6.0%, g = 0.47), whereas its effect on jump performance (−0.2%, g = 0.06) was trivial. Of the twenty-one studies, fourteen used foam rollers, while the other seven used roller massage bars/sticks. A tendency was found for foam rollers to offer larger effects on the recovery of strength performance (+5.6%, g = 0.27 vs. −0.1%, g = −0.01) than roller massagers. The differences in the effects between foam rolling devices in terms of pre-rolling did not seem to be of practical relevance (overall performance: +2.7 %, g = 0.11 vs. +0.4%, g = 0.21; flexibility: +5.0%, g = 0.32 vs. +1.6%, g = 0.39). Overall, it was determined that the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery are rather minor and partly negligible, but can be relevant in some cases (e.g., to increase sprint performance and flexibility or to reduce muscle pain sensation). Evidence seems to justify the widespread use of foam rolling as a warm-up activity rather than a recovery tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6465761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64657612019-04-25 A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery Wiewelhove, Thimo Döweling, Alexander Schneider, Christoph Hottenrott, Laura Meyer, Tim Kellmann, Michael Pfeiffer, Mark Ferrauti, Alexander Front Physiol Physiology Foam rolling is thought to improve muscular performance and flexibility as well as to alleviate muscle fatigue and soreness. For this reason, foam rolling has become a popular intervention in all kinds of sport settings used to increase the efficiency of training or competition preparation as well as to speed post-exercise recovery. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of foam rolling applied before (pre-rolling as a warm-up activity) and after (post-rolling as a recovery strategy) exercise on sprint, jump, and strength performance as well as on flexibility and muscle pain outcomes and to identify whether self-massage with a foam roller or a roller massager is more effective. A comprehensive and structured literature search was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro, and Cochrane Library search engines. Twenty-one studies were located that met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen studies used pre-rolling, while seven studies used post-rolling. Pre-rolling resulted in a small improvement in sprint performance (+0.7%, g = 0.28) and flexibility (+4.0%, g = 0.34), whereas the effect on jump (−1.9%, g = 0.09) and strength performance (+1.8%, g = 0.12) was negligible. Post-rolling slightly attenuated exercise-induced decreases in sprint (+3.1%, g = 0.34) and strength performance (+3.9 %, g = 0.21). It also reduced muscle pain perception (+6.0%, g = 0.47), whereas its effect on jump performance (−0.2%, g = 0.06) was trivial. Of the twenty-one studies, fourteen used foam rollers, while the other seven used roller massage bars/sticks. A tendency was found for foam rollers to offer larger effects on the recovery of strength performance (+5.6%, g = 0.27 vs. −0.1%, g = −0.01) than roller massagers. The differences in the effects between foam rolling devices in terms of pre-rolling did not seem to be of practical relevance (overall performance: +2.7 %, g = 0.11 vs. +0.4%, g = 0.21; flexibility: +5.0%, g = 0.32 vs. +1.6%, g = 0.39). Overall, it was determined that the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery are rather minor and partly negligible, but can be relevant in some cases (e.g., to increase sprint performance and flexibility or to reduce muscle pain sensation). Evidence seems to justify the widespread use of foam rolling as a warm-up activity rather than a recovery tool. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6465761/ /pubmed/31024339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00376 Text en Copyright © 2019 Wiewelhove, Döweling, Schneider, Hottenrott, Meyer, Kellmann, Pfeiffer and Ferrauti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Wiewelhove, Thimo Döweling, Alexander Schneider, Christoph Hottenrott, Laura Meyer, Tim Kellmann, Michael Pfeiffer, Mark Ferrauti, Alexander A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery |
title | A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery |
title_full | A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery |
title_fullStr | A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery |
title_short | A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery |
title_sort | meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiewelhovethimo ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT dowelingalexander ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT schneiderchristoph ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT hottenrottlaura ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT meyertim ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT kellmannmichael ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT pfeiffermark ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT ferrautialexander ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT wiewelhovethimo metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT dowelingalexander metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT schneiderchristoph metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT hottenrottlaura metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT meyertim metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT kellmannmichael metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT pfeiffermark metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery AT ferrautialexander metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery |