Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery

Foam rolling is thought to improve muscular performance and flexibility as well as to alleviate muscle fatigue and soreness. For this reason, foam rolling has become a popular intervention in all kinds of sport settings used to increase the efficiency of training or competition preparation as well a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiewelhove, Thimo, Döweling, Alexander, Schneider, Christoph, Hottenrott, Laura, Meyer, Tim, Kellmann, Michael, Pfeiffer, Mark, Ferrauti, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00376
_version_ 1783410988375080960
author Wiewelhove, Thimo
Döweling, Alexander
Schneider, Christoph
Hottenrott, Laura
Meyer, Tim
Kellmann, Michael
Pfeiffer, Mark
Ferrauti, Alexander
author_facet Wiewelhove, Thimo
Döweling, Alexander
Schneider, Christoph
Hottenrott, Laura
Meyer, Tim
Kellmann, Michael
Pfeiffer, Mark
Ferrauti, Alexander
author_sort Wiewelhove, Thimo
collection PubMed
description Foam rolling is thought to improve muscular performance and flexibility as well as to alleviate muscle fatigue and soreness. For this reason, foam rolling has become a popular intervention in all kinds of sport settings used to increase the efficiency of training or competition preparation as well as to speed post-exercise recovery. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of foam rolling applied before (pre-rolling as a warm-up activity) and after (post-rolling as a recovery strategy) exercise on sprint, jump, and strength performance as well as on flexibility and muscle pain outcomes and to identify whether self-massage with a foam roller or a roller massager is more effective. A comprehensive and structured literature search was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro, and Cochrane Library search engines. Twenty-one studies were located that met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen studies used pre-rolling, while seven studies used post-rolling. Pre-rolling resulted in a small improvement in sprint performance (+0.7%, g = 0.28) and flexibility (+4.0%, g = 0.34), whereas the effect on jump (−1.9%, g = 0.09) and strength performance (+1.8%, g = 0.12) was negligible. Post-rolling slightly attenuated exercise-induced decreases in sprint (+3.1%, g = 0.34) and strength performance (+3.9 %, g = 0.21). It also reduced muscle pain perception (+6.0%, g = 0.47), whereas its effect on jump performance (−0.2%, g = 0.06) was trivial. Of the twenty-one studies, fourteen used foam rollers, while the other seven used roller massage bars/sticks. A tendency was found for foam rollers to offer larger effects on the recovery of strength performance (+5.6%, g = 0.27 vs. −0.1%, g = −0.01) than roller massagers. The differences in the effects between foam rolling devices in terms of pre-rolling did not seem to be of practical relevance (overall performance: +2.7 %, g = 0.11 vs. +0.4%, g = 0.21; flexibility: +5.0%, g = 0.32 vs. +1.6%, g = 0.39). Overall, it was determined that the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery are rather minor and partly negligible, but can be relevant in some cases (e.g., to increase sprint performance and flexibility or to reduce muscle pain sensation). Evidence seems to justify the widespread use of foam rolling as a warm-up activity rather than a recovery tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6465761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64657612019-04-25 A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery Wiewelhove, Thimo Döweling, Alexander Schneider, Christoph Hottenrott, Laura Meyer, Tim Kellmann, Michael Pfeiffer, Mark Ferrauti, Alexander Front Physiol Physiology Foam rolling is thought to improve muscular performance and flexibility as well as to alleviate muscle fatigue and soreness. For this reason, foam rolling has become a popular intervention in all kinds of sport settings used to increase the efficiency of training or competition preparation as well as to speed post-exercise recovery. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of foam rolling applied before (pre-rolling as a warm-up activity) and after (post-rolling as a recovery strategy) exercise on sprint, jump, and strength performance as well as on flexibility and muscle pain outcomes and to identify whether self-massage with a foam roller or a roller massager is more effective. A comprehensive and structured literature search was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro, and Cochrane Library search engines. Twenty-one studies were located that met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen studies used pre-rolling, while seven studies used post-rolling. Pre-rolling resulted in a small improvement in sprint performance (+0.7%, g = 0.28) and flexibility (+4.0%, g = 0.34), whereas the effect on jump (−1.9%, g = 0.09) and strength performance (+1.8%, g = 0.12) was negligible. Post-rolling slightly attenuated exercise-induced decreases in sprint (+3.1%, g = 0.34) and strength performance (+3.9 %, g = 0.21). It also reduced muscle pain perception (+6.0%, g = 0.47), whereas its effect on jump performance (−0.2%, g = 0.06) was trivial. Of the twenty-one studies, fourteen used foam rollers, while the other seven used roller massage bars/sticks. A tendency was found for foam rollers to offer larger effects on the recovery of strength performance (+5.6%, g = 0.27 vs. −0.1%, g = −0.01) than roller massagers. The differences in the effects between foam rolling devices in terms of pre-rolling did not seem to be of practical relevance (overall performance: +2.7 %, g = 0.11 vs. +0.4%, g = 0.21; flexibility: +5.0%, g = 0.32 vs. +1.6%, g = 0.39). Overall, it was determined that the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery are rather minor and partly negligible, but can be relevant in some cases (e.g., to increase sprint performance and flexibility or to reduce muscle pain sensation). Evidence seems to justify the widespread use of foam rolling as a warm-up activity rather than a recovery tool. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6465761/ /pubmed/31024339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00376 Text en Copyright © 2019 Wiewelhove, Döweling, Schneider, Hottenrott, Meyer, Kellmann, Pfeiffer and Ferrauti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Wiewelhove, Thimo
Döweling, Alexander
Schneider, Christoph
Hottenrott, Laura
Meyer, Tim
Kellmann, Michael
Pfeiffer, Mark
Ferrauti, Alexander
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
title A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
title_full A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
title_short A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery
title_sort meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00376
work_keys_str_mv AT wiewelhovethimo ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT dowelingalexander ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT schneiderchristoph ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT hottenrottlaura ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT meyertim ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT kellmannmichael ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT pfeiffermark ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT ferrautialexander ametaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT wiewelhovethimo metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT dowelingalexander metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT schneiderchristoph metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT hottenrottlaura metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT meyertim metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT kellmannmichael metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT pfeiffermark metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery
AT ferrautialexander metaanalysisoftheeffectsoffoamrollingonperformanceandrecovery