Cargando…
A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners
The aim of this study was to two-dimensionally evaluate deviation errors at five digital cross-sections of single-tooth abutment in regards to data obtained from two intraoral scanners, and to evaluate accuracy of individual scanners. Two intraoral scanners, the Trios 3(®) (3 Shape, Copenhagen, Denm...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30897832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061021 |
_version_ | 1783411038759157760 |
---|---|
author | Maeng, Jiyoun Lim, Young-Jun Kim, Bongju Kim, Myung-Joo Kwon, Ho-Beom |
author_facet | Maeng, Jiyoun Lim, Young-Jun Kim, Bongju Kim, Myung-Joo Kwon, Ho-Beom |
author_sort | Maeng, Jiyoun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to two-dimensionally evaluate deviation errors at five digital cross-sections of single-tooth abutment in regards to data obtained from two intraoral scanners, and to evaluate accuracy of individual scanners. Two intraoral scanners, the Trios 3(®) (3 Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and EzScan(®) (Vatech, Hwaseong, Korea), were evaluated by utilizing 13 stone models. The superimposed 3D data files were sectioned into five different planes: buccal-lingual section (BL), mesial-distal section (MD), transverse high section (TH), transverse middle section (TM), and transverse low section (TL). Accuracy comparison between the two scanners in 5 groups was performed. BL vs. MD of each scanner, and three transverse groups (TH, TM, TL) of each scanner were analyzed for accuracy comparison. In comparison of 2-D analyses for two intraoral scanners, Trios 3(®) showed statistically significant higher accuracy in root mean square (RMS) at BL, TH, and TL (p < 0.05). For each scanner, RMS value showed that mesial-distal sections were more prone to error than buccal-lingual section, which exhibited statistically significant errors (p < 0.05) while the transverse groups did not. Two-dimensional analysis is more insightful than three-dimensional analysis on single-tooth abutment. In mesiodistal areas, rough prepped areas, and sharp edges where scanner accessibility is difficult, high deviation errors are shown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6466129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64661292019-04-22 A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners Maeng, Jiyoun Lim, Young-Jun Kim, Bongju Kim, Myung-Joo Kwon, Ho-Beom Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of this study was to two-dimensionally evaluate deviation errors at five digital cross-sections of single-tooth abutment in regards to data obtained from two intraoral scanners, and to evaluate accuracy of individual scanners. Two intraoral scanners, the Trios 3(®) (3 Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and EzScan(®) (Vatech, Hwaseong, Korea), were evaluated by utilizing 13 stone models. The superimposed 3D data files were sectioned into five different planes: buccal-lingual section (BL), mesial-distal section (MD), transverse high section (TH), transverse middle section (TM), and transverse low section (TL). Accuracy comparison between the two scanners in 5 groups was performed. BL vs. MD of each scanner, and three transverse groups (TH, TM, TL) of each scanner were analyzed for accuracy comparison. In comparison of 2-D analyses for two intraoral scanners, Trios 3(®) showed statistically significant higher accuracy in root mean square (RMS) at BL, TH, and TL (p < 0.05). For each scanner, RMS value showed that mesial-distal sections were more prone to error than buccal-lingual section, which exhibited statistically significant errors (p < 0.05) while the transverse groups did not. Two-dimensional analysis is more insightful than three-dimensional analysis on single-tooth abutment. In mesiodistal areas, rough prepped areas, and sharp edges where scanner accessibility is difficult, high deviation errors are shown. MDPI 2019-03-20 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6466129/ /pubmed/30897832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061021 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Maeng, Jiyoun Lim, Young-Jun Kim, Bongju Kim, Myung-Joo Kwon, Ho-Beom A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners |
title | A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners |
title_full | A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners |
title_fullStr | A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners |
title_short | A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners |
title_sort | new approach to accuracy evaluation of single-tooth abutment using two-dimensional analysis in two intraoral scanners |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30897832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maengjiyoun anewapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT limyoungjun anewapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT kimbongju anewapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT kimmyungjoo anewapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT kwonhobeom anewapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT maengjiyoun newapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT limyoungjun newapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT kimbongju newapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT kimmyungjoo newapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners AT kwonhobeom newapproachtoaccuracyevaluationofsingletoothabutmentusingtwodimensionalanalysisintwointraoralscanners |