Cargando…

Circadian Clocks in Fish—What Have We Learned so far?

Zebrafish represent the one alternative vertebrate, genetic model system to mice that can be easily manipulated in a laboratory setting. With the teleost Medaka (Oryzias latipes), which now has a significant following, and over 30,000 other fish species worldwide, there is great potential to study t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frøland Steindal, Inga A., Whitmore, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology8010017
_version_ 1783411043925491712
author Frøland Steindal, Inga A.
Whitmore, David
author_facet Frøland Steindal, Inga A.
Whitmore, David
author_sort Frøland Steindal, Inga A.
collection PubMed
description Zebrafish represent the one alternative vertebrate, genetic model system to mice that can be easily manipulated in a laboratory setting. With the teleost Medaka (Oryzias latipes), which now has a significant following, and over 30,000 other fish species worldwide, there is great potential to study the biology of environmental adaptation using teleosts. Zebrafish are primarily used for research on developmental biology, for obvious reasons. However, fish in general have also contributed to our understanding of circadian clock biology in the broadest sense. In this review, we will discuss selected areas where this contribution seems most unique. This will include a discussion of the issue of central versus peripheral clocks, in which zebrafish played an early role; the global nature of light sensitivity; and the critical role played by light in regulating cell biology. In addition, we also discuss the importance of the clock in controlling the timing of fundamental aspects of cell biology, such as the temporal control of the cell cycle. Many of these findings are applicable to the majority of vertebrate species. However, some reflect the unique manner in which “fish” can solve biological problems, in an evolutionary context. Genome duplication events simply mean that many fish species have more gene copies to “throw at a problem”, and evolution seems to have taken advantage of this “gene abundance”. How this relates to their poor cousins, the mammals, remains to be seen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6466151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64661512019-04-19 Circadian Clocks in Fish—What Have We Learned so far? Frøland Steindal, Inga A. Whitmore, David Biology (Basel) Review Zebrafish represent the one alternative vertebrate, genetic model system to mice that can be easily manipulated in a laboratory setting. With the teleost Medaka (Oryzias latipes), which now has a significant following, and over 30,000 other fish species worldwide, there is great potential to study the biology of environmental adaptation using teleosts. Zebrafish are primarily used for research on developmental biology, for obvious reasons. However, fish in general have also contributed to our understanding of circadian clock biology in the broadest sense. In this review, we will discuss selected areas where this contribution seems most unique. This will include a discussion of the issue of central versus peripheral clocks, in which zebrafish played an early role; the global nature of light sensitivity; and the critical role played by light in regulating cell biology. In addition, we also discuss the importance of the clock in controlling the timing of fundamental aspects of cell biology, such as the temporal control of the cell cycle. Many of these findings are applicable to the majority of vertebrate species. However, some reflect the unique manner in which “fish” can solve biological problems, in an evolutionary context. Genome duplication events simply mean that many fish species have more gene copies to “throw at a problem”, and evolution seems to have taken advantage of this “gene abundance”. How this relates to their poor cousins, the mammals, remains to be seen. MDPI 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6466151/ /pubmed/30893815 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology8010017 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Frøland Steindal, Inga A.
Whitmore, David
Circadian Clocks in Fish—What Have We Learned so far?
title Circadian Clocks in Fish—What Have We Learned so far?
title_full Circadian Clocks in Fish—What Have We Learned so far?
title_fullStr Circadian Clocks in Fish—What Have We Learned so far?
title_full_unstemmed Circadian Clocks in Fish—What Have We Learned so far?
title_short Circadian Clocks in Fish—What Have We Learned so far?
title_sort circadian clocks in fish—what have we learned so far?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology8010017
work_keys_str_mv AT frølandsteindalingaa circadianclocksinfishwhathavewelearnedsofar
AT whitmoredavid circadianclocksinfishwhathavewelearnedsofar