Cargando…

The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

The focus of this study is to investigate if power type improves organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) through work engagement. Based on existing research, power can be classified into two main types: coercive and non-coercive power. Coercive power is divided into the categories of coercion, rew...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Park, Kwang O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30897801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061015
_version_ 1783411058887622656
author Park, Kwang O.
author_facet Park, Kwang O.
author_sort Park, Kwang O.
collection PubMed
description The focus of this study is to investigate if power type improves organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) through work engagement. Based on existing research, power can be classified into two main types: coercive and non-coercive power. Coercive power is divided into the categories of coercion, reward, and legitimate power, and non-coercive power can be divided into information, expert, and reference power. Therefore, this study examines what kind of relationship is formed in the work engagement of organization members based on power type, and ultimately empirically investigates the effects on OCB. Although it is very important in organizational research, no study has yet been conducted on the relationships between power type, work engagement, and OCB. The survey targets of this study were the companies listed on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI), a stock market in South Korea. The companies listed on the KOSPI are the representative companies of South Korea, as announced by the South Korean government based on their market representativeness, liquidity, and industry representativeness. This study sheds new light on the relationships between power type, work engagement, and OCB which have been overlooked from both the academic and practical perspectives. Based on this study, it is expected that power types that have practical influence will be further investigated, and the plans required for the maintenance of better relationships in an organization could then be established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6466222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64662222019-04-22 The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors Park, Kwang O. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The focus of this study is to investigate if power type improves organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) through work engagement. Based on existing research, power can be classified into two main types: coercive and non-coercive power. Coercive power is divided into the categories of coercion, reward, and legitimate power, and non-coercive power can be divided into information, expert, and reference power. Therefore, this study examines what kind of relationship is formed in the work engagement of organization members based on power type, and ultimately empirically investigates the effects on OCB. Although it is very important in organizational research, no study has yet been conducted on the relationships between power type, work engagement, and OCB. The survey targets of this study were the companies listed on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI), a stock market in South Korea. The companies listed on the KOSPI are the representative companies of South Korea, as announced by the South Korean government based on their market representativeness, liquidity, and industry representativeness. This study sheds new light on the relationships between power type, work engagement, and OCB which have been overlooked from both the academic and practical perspectives. Based on this study, it is expected that power types that have practical influence will be further investigated, and the plans required for the maintenance of better relationships in an organization could then be established. MDPI 2019-03-20 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6466222/ /pubmed/30897801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061015 Text en © 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Park, Kwang O.
The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
title The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
title_full The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
title_fullStr The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
title_short The Relationship between Power Type, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
title_sort relationship between power type, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30897801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061015
work_keys_str_mv AT parkkwango therelationshipbetweenpowertypeworkengagementandorganizationalcitizenshipbehaviors
AT parkkwango relationshipbetweenpowertypeworkengagementandorganizationalcitizenshipbehaviors