Cargando…
Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action GroupHouseNet aims to provide synergy among scientists to prevent damaging behavior in group-housed pigs and laying hens. One goal of this network is to determine how genetic and genomic tools can be used to breed anima...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909407 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9030108 |
_version_ | 1783411073970339840 |
---|---|
author | Ellen, Esther D. van der Sluis, Malou Siegford, Janice Guzhva, Oleksiy Toscano, Michael J. Bennewitz, Jörn van der Zande, Lisette E. van der Eijk, Jerine A. J. de Haas, Elske N. Norton, Tomas Piette, Deborah Tetens, Jens de Klerk, Britt Visser, Bram Rodenburg, T. Bas |
author_facet | Ellen, Esther D. van der Sluis, Malou Siegford, Janice Guzhva, Oleksiy Toscano, Michael J. Bennewitz, Jörn van der Zande, Lisette E. van der Eijk, Jerine A. J. de Haas, Elske N. Norton, Tomas Piette, Deborah Tetens, Jens de Klerk, Britt Visser, Bram Rodenburg, T. Bas |
author_sort | Ellen, Esther D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action GroupHouseNet aims to provide synergy among scientists to prevent damaging behavior in group-housed pigs and laying hens. One goal of this network is to determine how genetic and genomic tools can be used to breed animals that are less likely to perform damaging behavior on their pen-mates. In this review, the focus is on feather-pecking behavior in laying hens. Reducing feather pecking in large groups of hens is a challenge, because it is difficult to identify and monitor individual birds. However, current developments in sensor technologies and animal breeding have the potential to identify individual animals, monitor individual behavior, and link this information back to the underlying genotype. We describe a combination of sensor technologies and “-omics” approaches that could be used to select against feather-pecking behavior in laying hens. ABSTRACT: Damaging behaviors, like feather pecking (FP), have large economic and welfare consequences in the commercial laying hen industry. Selective breeding can be used to obtain animals that are less likely to perform damaging behavior on their pen-mates. However, with the growing tendency to keep birds in large groups, identifying specific birds that are performing or receiving FP is difficult. With current developments in sensor technologies, it may now be possible to identify laying hens in large groups that show less FP behavior and select them for breeding. We propose using a combination of sensor technology and genomic methods to identify feather peckers and victims in groups. In this review, we will describe the use of “-omics” approaches to understand FP and give an overview of sensor technologies that can be used for animal monitoring, such as ultra-wideband, radio frequency identification, and computer vision. We will then discuss the identification of indicator traits from both sensor technologies and genomics approaches that can be used to select animals for breeding against damaging behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6466287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64662872019-04-18 Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking Ellen, Esther D. van der Sluis, Malou Siegford, Janice Guzhva, Oleksiy Toscano, Michael J. Bennewitz, Jörn van der Zande, Lisette E. van der Eijk, Jerine A. J. de Haas, Elske N. Norton, Tomas Piette, Deborah Tetens, Jens de Klerk, Britt Visser, Bram Rodenburg, T. Bas Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action GroupHouseNet aims to provide synergy among scientists to prevent damaging behavior in group-housed pigs and laying hens. One goal of this network is to determine how genetic and genomic tools can be used to breed animals that are less likely to perform damaging behavior on their pen-mates. In this review, the focus is on feather-pecking behavior in laying hens. Reducing feather pecking in large groups of hens is a challenge, because it is difficult to identify and monitor individual birds. However, current developments in sensor technologies and animal breeding have the potential to identify individual animals, monitor individual behavior, and link this information back to the underlying genotype. We describe a combination of sensor technologies and “-omics” approaches that could be used to select against feather-pecking behavior in laying hens. ABSTRACT: Damaging behaviors, like feather pecking (FP), have large economic and welfare consequences in the commercial laying hen industry. Selective breeding can be used to obtain animals that are less likely to perform damaging behavior on their pen-mates. However, with the growing tendency to keep birds in large groups, identifying specific birds that are performing or receiving FP is difficult. With current developments in sensor technologies, it may now be possible to identify laying hens in large groups that show less FP behavior and select them for breeding. We propose using a combination of sensor technology and genomic methods to identify feather peckers and victims in groups. In this review, we will describe the use of “-omics” approaches to understand FP and give an overview of sensor technologies that can be used for animal monitoring, such as ultra-wideband, radio frequency identification, and computer vision. We will then discuss the identification of indicator traits from both sensor technologies and genomics approaches that can be used to select animals for breeding against damaging behavior. MDPI 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6466287/ /pubmed/30909407 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9030108 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ellen, Esther D. van der Sluis, Malou Siegford, Janice Guzhva, Oleksiy Toscano, Michael J. Bennewitz, Jörn van der Zande, Lisette E. van der Eijk, Jerine A. J. de Haas, Elske N. Norton, Tomas Piette, Deborah Tetens, Jens de Klerk, Britt Visser, Bram Rodenburg, T. Bas Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking |
title | Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking |
title_full | Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking |
title_fullStr | Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking |
title_short | Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking |
title_sort | review of sensor technologies in animal breeding: phenotyping behaviors of laying hens to select against feather pecking |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909407 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9030108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellenestherd reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT vandersluismalou reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT siegfordjanice reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT guzhvaoleksiy reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT toscanomichaelj reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT bennewitzjorn reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT vanderzandelisettee reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT vandereijkjerineaj reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT dehaaselsken reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT nortontomas reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT piettedeborah reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT tetensjens reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT deklerkbritt reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT visserbram reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking AT rodenburgtbas reviewofsensortechnologiesinanimalbreedingphenotypingbehaviorsoflayinghenstoselectagainstfeatherpecking |