Cargando…
Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
Traditionally, health sciences libraries have supported patrons who are preparing for medical licensure examinations by collecting and making accessible board exam preparation resources, such as question banks and study guides. However, when online board exam preparation resources are not available...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical Library Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019395 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619 |
_version_ | 1783411120985341952 |
---|---|
author | O’Hanlon, Robin Laynor, Gregory |
author_facet | O’Hanlon, Robin Laynor, Gregory |
author_sort | O’Hanlon, Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditionally, health sciences libraries have supported patrons who are preparing for medical licensure examinations by collecting and making accessible board exam preparation resources, such as question banks and study guides. However, when online board exam preparation resources are not available for licensing, providing equitable access to all library users can be a challenge. In recent years, a new generation of online study resources has emerged. Sites such as SketchyMedical and Picmonic use visual learning mnemonics, while resources such as Quizlet leverage crowd-sourcing to generate study content. While some of the content from these resources is made freely available, these resources are often limited to paid individual subscribers. This new generation of study resources, thus, presents a conundrum for health sciences librarians. On the one hand, these innovative resources offer new insights into how students learn and study, reflecting pedagogical trends in self-directed learning. On the other hand, the proprietary individual subscription–based model of these resources can widen the achievement gap between students who can afford to pay subscription costs and those who cannot. This commentary provides an overview of some of the most popular medical board examination preparation resources that have emerged in recent years. The authors suggest that health sciences librarians collaborate with medical students and educators to better understand and evaluate these resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6466489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medical Library Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64664892019-04-24 Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education O’Hanlon, Robin Laynor, Gregory J Med Libr Assoc Commentary Traditionally, health sciences libraries have supported patrons who are preparing for medical licensure examinations by collecting and making accessible board exam preparation resources, such as question banks and study guides. However, when online board exam preparation resources are not available for licensing, providing equitable access to all library users can be a challenge. In recent years, a new generation of online study resources has emerged. Sites such as SketchyMedical and Picmonic use visual learning mnemonics, while resources such as Quizlet leverage crowd-sourcing to generate study content. While some of the content from these resources is made freely available, these resources are often limited to paid individual subscribers. This new generation of study resources, thus, presents a conundrum for health sciences librarians. On the one hand, these innovative resources offer new insights into how students learn and study, reflecting pedagogical trends in self-directed learning. On the other hand, the proprietary individual subscription–based model of these resources can widen the achievement gap between students who can afford to pay subscription costs and those who cannot. This commentary provides an overview of some of the most popular medical board examination preparation resources that have emerged in recent years. The authors suggest that health sciences librarians collaborate with medical students and educators to better understand and evaluate these resources. Medical Library Association 2019-04 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6466489/ /pubmed/31019395 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619 Text en Copyright: © 2019, Authors. Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Commentary O’Hanlon, Robin Laynor, Gregory Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education |
title | Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education |
title_full | Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education |
title_fullStr | Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education |
title_full_unstemmed | Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education |
title_short | Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education |
title_sort | responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019395 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohanlonrobin respondingtoanewgenerationofproprietarystudyresourcesinmedicaleducation AT laynorgregory respondingtoanewgenerationofproprietarystudyresourcesinmedicaleducation |