Cargando…

Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education

Traditionally, health sciences libraries have supported patrons who are preparing for medical licensure examinations by collecting and making accessible board exam preparation resources, such as question banks and study guides. However, when online board exam preparation resources are not available...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Hanlon, Robin, Laynor, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Library Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019395
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619
_version_ 1783411120985341952
author O’Hanlon, Robin
Laynor, Gregory
author_facet O’Hanlon, Robin
Laynor, Gregory
author_sort O’Hanlon, Robin
collection PubMed
description Traditionally, health sciences libraries have supported patrons who are preparing for medical licensure examinations by collecting and making accessible board exam preparation resources, such as question banks and study guides. However, when online board exam preparation resources are not available for licensing, providing equitable access to all library users can be a challenge. In recent years, a new generation of online study resources has emerged. Sites such as SketchyMedical and Picmonic use visual learning mnemonics, while resources such as Quizlet leverage crowd-sourcing to generate study content. While some of the content from these resources is made freely available, these resources are often limited to paid individual subscribers. This new generation of study resources, thus, presents a conundrum for health sciences librarians. On the one hand, these innovative resources offer new insights into how students learn and study, reflecting pedagogical trends in self-directed learning. On the other hand, the proprietary individual subscription–based model of these resources can widen the achievement gap between students who can afford to pay subscription costs and those who cannot. This commentary provides an overview of some of the most popular medical board examination preparation resources that have emerged in recent years. The authors suggest that health sciences librarians collaborate with medical students and educators to better understand and evaluate these resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6466489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medical Library Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64664892019-04-24 Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education O’Hanlon, Robin Laynor, Gregory J Med Libr Assoc Commentary Traditionally, health sciences libraries have supported patrons who are preparing for medical licensure examinations by collecting and making accessible board exam preparation resources, such as question banks and study guides. However, when online board exam preparation resources are not available for licensing, providing equitable access to all library users can be a challenge. In recent years, a new generation of online study resources has emerged. Sites such as SketchyMedical and Picmonic use visual learning mnemonics, while resources such as Quizlet leverage crowd-sourcing to generate study content. While some of the content from these resources is made freely available, these resources are often limited to paid individual subscribers. This new generation of study resources, thus, presents a conundrum for health sciences librarians. On the one hand, these innovative resources offer new insights into how students learn and study, reflecting pedagogical trends in self-directed learning. On the other hand, the proprietary individual subscription–based model of these resources can widen the achievement gap between students who can afford to pay subscription costs and those who cannot. This commentary provides an overview of some of the most popular medical board examination preparation resources that have emerged in recent years. The authors suggest that health sciences librarians collaborate with medical students and educators to better understand and evaluate these resources. Medical Library Association 2019-04 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6466489/ /pubmed/31019395 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619 Text en Copyright: © 2019, Authors. Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Commentary
O’Hanlon, Robin
Laynor, Gregory
Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
title Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
title_full Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
title_fullStr Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
title_full_unstemmed Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
title_short Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
title_sort responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019395
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619
work_keys_str_mv AT ohanlonrobin respondingtoanewgenerationofproprietarystudyresourcesinmedicaleducation
AT laynorgregory respondingtoanewgenerationofproprietarystudyresourcesinmedicaleducation