Cargando…
Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
BACKGROUND: Delirium occurs commonly in older adults and is associated with adverse outcomes. Multicentre clinical trials evaluating interventions to prevent delirium are needed. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a validated instrument for delirium detection. We hypothesised it would be possi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30991945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1129-8 |
_version_ | 1783411163626733568 |
---|---|
author | Green, John R. Smith, Jane Teale, Elizabeth Collinson, Michelle Avidan, Michael S. Schmitt, Eva M. Inouye, Sharon K. Young, John |
author_facet | Green, John R. Smith, Jane Teale, Elizabeth Collinson, Michelle Avidan, Michael S. Schmitt, Eva M. Inouye, Sharon K. Young, John |
author_sort | Green, John R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Delirium occurs commonly in older adults and is associated with adverse outcomes. Multicentre clinical trials evaluating interventions to prevent delirium are needed. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a validated instrument for delirium detection. We hypothesised it would be possible for a large feasibility study to train a large number of research assistants, with varying experience levels, to conduct CAM assessments reliably in multiple hospital sites. METHODS: A standardised training programme was followed, incorporating structured training at a central location and at study sites. CAM practice sessions on both delirious and non-delirious patients by research assistants were conducted and, thereafter, there was ongoing inter-rater reliability assessment on the CAM between research assistant pairs at study sites. The setting was eight acute care hospitals in England and Wales. Participants were research assistants working on a multicentre feasibility study of delirium prevention. The measurement used was the Confusion Assessment Method. RESULTS: Thirty-seven research assistants were trained in CAM assessment and 33 returned training logs. The logs showed there was 100% overall agreement between research assistant pairs on 295 CAM assessments, of which 263 (89.2%) were negative for delirium and 32 (10.8%) were positive. In the course of the feasibility study, research assistants successfully completed 5065 (89.7%) of the 5645 expected CAM assessments, with minimal missing data. CONCLUSION: Using the training methods described in this study, it is possible to achieve high quality delirium assessments for large numbers of patients with little missing data across geographically dispersed sites in multicentre studies. The standardisation of multisite delirium assessments is an important contribution to research methodology, and provides a much-needed advance for the field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCT ISRCTN01187372. Registered 13 March 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6466721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64667212019-04-22 Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation Green, John R. Smith, Jane Teale, Elizabeth Collinson, Michelle Avidan, Michael S. Schmitt, Eva M. Inouye, Sharon K. Young, John BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Delirium occurs commonly in older adults and is associated with adverse outcomes. Multicentre clinical trials evaluating interventions to prevent delirium are needed. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a validated instrument for delirium detection. We hypothesised it would be possible for a large feasibility study to train a large number of research assistants, with varying experience levels, to conduct CAM assessments reliably in multiple hospital sites. METHODS: A standardised training programme was followed, incorporating structured training at a central location and at study sites. CAM practice sessions on both delirious and non-delirious patients by research assistants were conducted and, thereafter, there was ongoing inter-rater reliability assessment on the CAM between research assistant pairs at study sites. The setting was eight acute care hospitals in England and Wales. Participants were research assistants working on a multicentre feasibility study of delirium prevention. The measurement used was the Confusion Assessment Method. RESULTS: Thirty-seven research assistants were trained in CAM assessment and 33 returned training logs. The logs showed there was 100% overall agreement between research assistant pairs on 295 CAM assessments, of which 263 (89.2%) were negative for delirium and 32 (10.8%) were positive. In the course of the feasibility study, research assistants successfully completed 5065 (89.7%) of the 5645 expected CAM assessments, with minimal missing data. CONCLUSION: Using the training methods described in this study, it is possible to achieve high quality delirium assessments for large numbers of patients with little missing data across geographically dispersed sites in multicentre studies. The standardisation of multisite delirium assessments is an important contribution to research methodology, and provides a much-needed advance for the field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCT ISRCTN01187372. Registered 13 March 2014. BioMed Central 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6466721/ /pubmed/30991945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1129-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Green, John R. Smith, Jane Teale, Elizabeth Collinson, Michelle Avidan, Michael S. Schmitt, Eva M. Inouye, Sharon K. Young, John Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation |
title | Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation |
title_full | Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation |
title_fullStr | Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation |
title_short | Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation |
title_sort | use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30991945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1129-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenjohnr useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation AT smithjane useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation AT tealeelizabeth useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation AT collinsonmichelle useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation AT avidanmichaels useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation AT schmittevam useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation AT inouyesharonk useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation AT youngjohn useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation |