Cargando…

Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation

BACKGROUND: Delirium occurs commonly in older adults and is associated with adverse outcomes. Multicentre clinical trials evaluating interventions to prevent delirium are needed. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a validated instrument for delirium detection. We hypothesised it would be possi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, John R., Smith, Jane, Teale, Elizabeth, Collinson, Michelle, Avidan, Michael S., Schmitt, Eva M., Inouye, Sharon K., Young, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30991945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1129-8
_version_ 1783411163626733568
author Green, John R.
Smith, Jane
Teale, Elizabeth
Collinson, Michelle
Avidan, Michael S.
Schmitt, Eva M.
Inouye, Sharon K.
Young, John
author_facet Green, John R.
Smith, Jane
Teale, Elizabeth
Collinson, Michelle
Avidan, Michael S.
Schmitt, Eva M.
Inouye, Sharon K.
Young, John
author_sort Green, John R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delirium occurs commonly in older adults and is associated with adverse outcomes. Multicentre clinical trials evaluating interventions to prevent delirium are needed. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a validated instrument for delirium detection. We hypothesised it would be possible for a large feasibility study to train a large number of research assistants, with varying experience levels, to conduct CAM assessments reliably in multiple hospital sites. METHODS: A standardised training programme was followed, incorporating structured training at a central location and at study sites. CAM practice sessions on both delirious and non-delirious patients by research assistants were conducted and, thereafter, there was ongoing inter-rater reliability assessment on the CAM between research assistant pairs at study sites. The setting was eight acute care hospitals in England and Wales. Participants were research assistants working on a multicentre feasibility study of delirium prevention. The measurement used was the Confusion Assessment Method. RESULTS: Thirty-seven research assistants were trained in CAM assessment and 33 returned training logs. The logs showed there was 100% overall agreement between research assistant pairs on 295 CAM assessments, of which 263 (89.2%) were negative for delirium and 32 (10.8%) were positive. In the course of the feasibility study, research assistants successfully completed 5065 (89.7%) of the 5645 expected CAM assessments, with minimal missing data. CONCLUSION: Using the training methods described in this study, it is possible to achieve high quality delirium assessments for large numbers of patients with little missing data across geographically dispersed sites in multicentre studies. The standardisation of multisite delirium assessments is an important contribution to research methodology, and provides a much-needed advance for the field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCT ISRCTN01187372. Registered 13 March 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6466721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64667212019-04-22 Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation Green, John R. Smith, Jane Teale, Elizabeth Collinson, Michelle Avidan, Michael S. Schmitt, Eva M. Inouye, Sharon K. Young, John BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Delirium occurs commonly in older adults and is associated with adverse outcomes. Multicentre clinical trials evaluating interventions to prevent delirium are needed. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a validated instrument for delirium detection. We hypothesised it would be possible for a large feasibility study to train a large number of research assistants, with varying experience levels, to conduct CAM assessments reliably in multiple hospital sites. METHODS: A standardised training programme was followed, incorporating structured training at a central location and at study sites. CAM practice sessions on both delirious and non-delirious patients by research assistants were conducted and, thereafter, there was ongoing inter-rater reliability assessment on the CAM between research assistant pairs at study sites. The setting was eight acute care hospitals in England and Wales. Participants were research assistants working on a multicentre feasibility study of delirium prevention. The measurement used was the Confusion Assessment Method. RESULTS: Thirty-seven research assistants were trained in CAM assessment and 33 returned training logs. The logs showed there was 100% overall agreement between research assistant pairs on 295 CAM assessments, of which 263 (89.2%) were negative for delirium and 32 (10.8%) were positive. In the course of the feasibility study, research assistants successfully completed 5065 (89.7%) of the 5645 expected CAM assessments, with minimal missing data. CONCLUSION: Using the training methods described in this study, it is possible to achieve high quality delirium assessments for large numbers of patients with little missing data across geographically dispersed sites in multicentre studies. The standardisation of multisite delirium assessments is an important contribution to research methodology, and provides a much-needed advance for the field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCT ISRCTN01187372. Registered 13 March 2014. BioMed Central 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6466721/ /pubmed/30991945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1129-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Green, John R.
Smith, Jane
Teale, Elizabeth
Collinson, Michelle
Avidan, Michael S.
Schmitt, Eva M.
Inouye, Sharon K.
Young, John
Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
title Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
title_full Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
title_fullStr Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
title_full_unstemmed Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
title_short Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
title_sort use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30991945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1129-8
work_keys_str_mv AT greenjohnr useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation
AT smithjane useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation
AT tealeelizabeth useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation
AT collinsonmichelle useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation
AT avidanmichaels useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation
AT schmittevam useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation
AT inouyesharonk useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation
AT youngjohn useoftheconfusionassessmentmethodinmulticentredeliriumtrialstrainingandstandardisation