Cargando…

Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal and stomach cancer is usually performed under general anesthesia. However, propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation has been suggested as a viable alternative. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Ven, SEM, Leliveld, L, Klimek, M, Hilkemeijer, TRH, Bruno, MJ, Koch, AD
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640619831126
_version_ 1783411168729104384
author van de Ven, SEM
Leliveld, L
Klimek, M
Hilkemeijer, TRH
Bruno, MJ
Koch, AD
author_facet van de Ven, SEM
Leliveld, L
Klimek, M
Hilkemeijer, TRH
Bruno, MJ
Koch, AD
author_sort van de Ven, SEM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal and stomach cancer is usually performed under general anesthesia. However, propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation has been suggested as a viable alternative. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation during ESD in the upper gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ESD for upper gastrointestinal tumors with propofol-remifentanil analgosedation in a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands between October 2013 and February 2018. Primary endpoints were the rates of intraprocedural endoscopy- and anesthesia-related complications. Secondary endpoints were the postprocedural complication rates within 30 days and endotracheal intubation conversion rates. RESULTS: Of 88 patients, intraprocedural ESD-related complications occurred in three patients (3.4%). Intraprocedural anesthesia-related complications occurred in two patients (2.3%), one of whom required conversion to endotracheal intubation. Postprocedural ESD-related complications occurred in 14 patients (15.9%), and minor postprocedural complications occurred in two patients (2.3%). Eighty-two (93.2%) patients were discharged within one day after ESD. No patient was readmitted for anesthesia-related complications. CONCLUSION: Propofol-based sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for ESD procedures in the esophagus and stomach with low anesthesia-related complication rates and short hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6466747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64667472019-04-24 Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach van de Ven, SEM Leliveld, L Klimek, M Hilkemeijer, TRH Bruno, MJ Koch, AD United European Gastroenterol J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal and stomach cancer is usually performed under general anesthesia. However, propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation has been suggested as a viable alternative. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation during ESD in the upper gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ESD for upper gastrointestinal tumors with propofol-remifentanil analgosedation in a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands between October 2013 and February 2018. Primary endpoints were the rates of intraprocedural endoscopy- and anesthesia-related complications. Secondary endpoints were the postprocedural complication rates within 30 days and endotracheal intubation conversion rates. RESULTS: Of 88 patients, intraprocedural ESD-related complications occurred in three patients (3.4%). Intraprocedural anesthesia-related complications occurred in two patients (2.3%), one of whom required conversion to endotracheal intubation. Postprocedural ESD-related complications occurred in 14 patients (15.9%), and minor postprocedural complications occurred in two patients (2.3%). Eighty-two (93.2%) patients were discharged within one day after ESD. No patient was readmitted for anesthesia-related complications. CONCLUSION: Propofol-based sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for ESD procedures in the esophagus and stomach with low anesthesia-related complication rates and short hospital stay. SAGE Publications 2019-02-16 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6466747/ /pubmed/31019709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640619831126 Text en © Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
van de Ven, SEM
Leliveld, L
Klimek, M
Hilkemeijer, TRH
Bruno, MJ
Koch, AD
Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach
title Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach
title_full Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach
title_fullStr Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach
title_full_unstemmed Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach
title_short Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach
title_sort propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640619831126
work_keys_str_mv AT vandevensem propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach
AT leliveldl propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach
AT klimekm propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach
AT hilkemeijertrh propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach
AT brunomj propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach
AT kochad propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach