Cargando…
Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal and stomach cancer is usually performed under general anesthesia. However, propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation has been suggested as a viable alternative. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640619831126 |
_version_ | 1783411168729104384 |
---|---|
author | van de Ven, SEM Leliveld, L Klimek, M Hilkemeijer, TRH Bruno, MJ Koch, AD |
author_facet | van de Ven, SEM Leliveld, L Klimek, M Hilkemeijer, TRH Bruno, MJ Koch, AD |
author_sort | van de Ven, SEM |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal and stomach cancer is usually performed under general anesthesia. However, propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation has been suggested as a viable alternative. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation during ESD in the upper gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ESD for upper gastrointestinal tumors with propofol-remifentanil analgosedation in a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands between October 2013 and February 2018. Primary endpoints were the rates of intraprocedural endoscopy- and anesthesia-related complications. Secondary endpoints were the postprocedural complication rates within 30 days and endotracheal intubation conversion rates. RESULTS: Of 88 patients, intraprocedural ESD-related complications occurred in three patients (3.4%). Intraprocedural anesthesia-related complications occurred in two patients (2.3%), one of whom required conversion to endotracheal intubation. Postprocedural ESD-related complications occurred in 14 patients (15.9%), and minor postprocedural complications occurred in two patients (2.3%). Eighty-two (93.2%) patients were discharged within one day after ESD. No patient was readmitted for anesthesia-related complications. CONCLUSION: Propofol-based sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for ESD procedures in the esophagus and stomach with low anesthesia-related complication rates and short hospital stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6466747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64667472019-04-24 Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach van de Ven, SEM Leliveld, L Klimek, M Hilkemeijer, TRH Bruno, MJ Koch, AD United European Gastroenterol J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal and stomach cancer is usually performed under general anesthesia. However, propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation has been suggested as a viable alternative. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation during ESD in the upper gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ESD for upper gastrointestinal tumors with propofol-remifentanil analgosedation in a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands between October 2013 and February 2018. Primary endpoints were the rates of intraprocedural endoscopy- and anesthesia-related complications. Secondary endpoints were the postprocedural complication rates within 30 days and endotracheal intubation conversion rates. RESULTS: Of 88 patients, intraprocedural ESD-related complications occurred in three patients (3.4%). Intraprocedural anesthesia-related complications occurred in two patients (2.3%), one of whom required conversion to endotracheal intubation. Postprocedural ESD-related complications occurred in 14 patients (15.9%), and minor postprocedural complications occurred in two patients (2.3%). Eighty-two (93.2%) patients were discharged within one day after ESD. No patient was readmitted for anesthesia-related complications. CONCLUSION: Propofol-based sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for ESD procedures in the esophagus and stomach with low anesthesia-related complication rates and short hospital stay. SAGE Publications 2019-02-16 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6466747/ /pubmed/31019709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640619831126 Text en © Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles van de Ven, SEM Leliveld, L Klimek, M Hilkemeijer, TRH Bruno, MJ Koch, AD Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach |
title | Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach |
title_full | Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach |
title_fullStr | Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach |
title_full_unstemmed | Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach |
title_short | Propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach |
title_sort | propofol sedation without endotracheal intubation is safe for endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640619831126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandevensem propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach AT leliveldl propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach AT klimekm propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach AT hilkemeijertrh propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach AT brunomj propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach AT kochad propofolsedationwithoutendotrachealintubationissafeforendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionintheesophagusandstomach |