Cargando…
Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice shows that venous thromboembolism (VTE) presents a substantial burden in medical patients, and awareness and advocacy for its primary and secondary prevention remains inadequate. Specific patient populations, such as those with cancer and the critically ill, show elevat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-019-0196-6 |
_version_ | 1783411178562650112 |
---|---|
author | Brenner, Benjamin Hull, Russell Arya, Roopen Beyer-Westendorf, Jan Douketis, James Elalamy, Ismail Imberti, Davide Zhai, Zhenguo |
author_facet | Brenner, Benjamin Hull, Russell Arya, Roopen Beyer-Westendorf, Jan Douketis, James Elalamy, Ismail Imberti, Davide Zhai, Zhenguo |
author_sort | Brenner, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical practice shows that venous thromboembolism (VTE) presents a substantial burden in medical patients, and awareness and advocacy for its primary and secondary prevention remains inadequate. Specific patient populations, such as those with cancer and the critically ill, show elevated risk for VTE, bleeding or both, and significant gaps in VTE prophylaxis and treatment exist in these groups. OBJECTIVE: To present novel insights and consolidated evidence collected from experts, clinical practice guidelines and original studies on the unmet needs in thromboprophylaxis, and on the treatment of VTE in two high-risk patient groups: patients with cancer and the critically ill. METHODOLOGY: To identify specific unmet needs in the management of VTE, a methodology was designed and implemented that assessed gaps in prophylaxis and treatment of VTE through interviews with 44 experts in the field of thrombosis and haemostasis, and through a review of current guidelines and seminal studies to substantiate the insights provided by the experts. The research findings were then analysed, discussed and consolidated by a multidisciplinary group of experts. RESULTS: The gap analysis methodology identified shortcomings in the VTE risk assessment tools, patient stratification approaches for prophylaxis, and the suboptimal use of anticoagulants for primary prophylaxis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Specifically, patients with cancer need better VTE risk assessment tools to tailor primary thromboprophylaxis to tumour types and disease stages, and the potential for drug–drug interactions needs to be considered. In critically ill patients, unfractionated heparin is not advised as a first-line treatment option, and the strength of evidence is increasing for direct oral anticoagulants as a treatment option over low-molecular-weight heparins. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12959-019-0196-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6466798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64667982019-04-22 Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill Brenner, Benjamin Hull, Russell Arya, Roopen Beyer-Westendorf, Jan Douketis, James Elalamy, Ismail Imberti, Davide Zhai, Zhenguo Thromb J Review BACKGROUND: Clinical practice shows that venous thromboembolism (VTE) presents a substantial burden in medical patients, and awareness and advocacy for its primary and secondary prevention remains inadequate. Specific patient populations, such as those with cancer and the critically ill, show elevated risk for VTE, bleeding or both, and significant gaps in VTE prophylaxis and treatment exist in these groups. OBJECTIVE: To present novel insights and consolidated evidence collected from experts, clinical practice guidelines and original studies on the unmet needs in thromboprophylaxis, and on the treatment of VTE in two high-risk patient groups: patients with cancer and the critically ill. METHODOLOGY: To identify specific unmet needs in the management of VTE, a methodology was designed and implemented that assessed gaps in prophylaxis and treatment of VTE through interviews with 44 experts in the field of thrombosis and haemostasis, and through a review of current guidelines and seminal studies to substantiate the insights provided by the experts. The research findings were then analysed, discussed and consolidated by a multidisciplinary group of experts. RESULTS: The gap analysis methodology identified shortcomings in the VTE risk assessment tools, patient stratification approaches for prophylaxis, and the suboptimal use of anticoagulants for primary prophylaxis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Specifically, patients with cancer need better VTE risk assessment tools to tailor primary thromboprophylaxis to tumour types and disease stages, and the potential for drug–drug interactions needs to be considered. In critically ill patients, unfractionated heparin is not advised as a first-line treatment option, and the strength of evidence is increasing for direct oral anticoagulants as a treatment option over low-molecular-weight heparins. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12959-019-0196-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6466798/ /pubmed/31011294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-019-0196-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Brenner, Benjamin Hull, Russell Arya, Roopen Beyer-Westendorf, Jan Douketis, James Elalamy, Ismail Imberti, Davide Zhai, Zhenguo Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill |
title | Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill |
title_full | Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill |
title_short | Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill |
title_sort | evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-019-0196-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brennerbenjamin evaluationofunmetclinicalneedsinprophylaxisandtreatmentofvenousthromboembolisminhighriskpatientgroupscancerandcriticallyill AT hullrussell evaluationofunmetclinicalneedsinprophylaxisandtreatmentofvenousthromboembolisminhighriskpatientgroupscancerandcriticallyill AT aryaroopen evaluationofunmetclinicalneedsinprophylaxisandtreatmentofvenousthromboembolisminhighriskpatientgroupscancerandcriticallyill AT beyerwestendorfjan evaluationofunmetclinicalneedsinprophylaxisandtreatmentofvenousthromboembolisminhighriskpatientgroupscancerandcriticallyill AT douketisjames evaluationofunmetclinicalneedsinprophylaxisandtreatmentofvenousthromboembolisminhighriskpatientgroupscancerandcriticallyill AT elalamyismail evaluationofunmetclinicalneedsinprophylaxisandtreatmentofvenousthromboembolisminhighriskpatientgroupscancerandcriticallyill AT imbertidavide evaluationofunmetclinicalneedsinprophylaxisandtreatmentofvenousthromboembolisminhighriskpatientgroupscancerandcriticallyill AT zhaizhenguo evaluationofunmetclinicalneedsinprophylaxisandtreatmentofvenousthromboembolisminhighriskpatientgroupscancerandcriticallyill |