Cargando…
Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR
INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an important therapeutic option for aortic stenosis (AS) patients who have high surgical risk. TAVR is a complex procedure. Proper preparation of the patient is of significant importance for the final success and affects the morbidity and morta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7478608 |
_version_ | 1783411206556483584 |
---|---|
author | Sahiner, Levent Coteli, Cem Kivrak, Ahmet Sener, Yusuf Ziya Asil, Serkan Hazirolan, Tuncay Kaya, Ergun Baris Ozer, Necla Aytemir, Kudret |
author_facet | Sahiner, Levent Coteli, Cem Kivrak, Ahmet Sener, Yusuf Ziya Asil, Serkan Hazirolan, Tuncay Kaya, Ergun Baris Ozer, Necla Aytemir, Kudret |
author_sort | Sahiner, Levent |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an important therapeutic option for aortic stenosis (AS) patients who have high surgical risk. TAVR is a complex procedure. Proper preparation of the patient is of significant importance for the final success and affects the morbidity and mortality of the TAVR directly. Pre-TAVR computed tomography is one of the corner stones of these preparation steps, and many patients get some incidental diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this trial, we have investigated 155 patients who had underwent TAVR between February 2013 and March 2017 at Hacettepe University Adult Hospital Cardiology Clinic. RESULTS: Total number of incidental diagnoses was 541, and 451 of them were the first diagnoses. Total number of cardiovascular findings and noncardiovascular findings was 369 and 172, respectively. The most common cardiovascular finding is atherosclerotic heart disease (139, 89.6%). The most common noncardiovascular finding is pulmonary nodule (41, 26.4%). 143 of 155 patients had at least one incidental diagnosis after the reassessment, and 33 different diagnoses were identified with computed tomography. The mean STS-PROM was 8.38% (range 2.8% to 23%), and the mean STS-PROM was calculated 9.4% (range 3.6% to 23%) after the reassessment of computed tomography. CONCLUSION: Preprocedural evaluation is one of the most important steps in TAVR. Computed tomography imaging provides extensive information, not only for procedure planning. Our findings emphasize that computed tomography has a crucial role for the preprocedural evaluation of TAVR candidates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6466941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64669412019-05-06 Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR Sahiner, Levent Coteli, Cem Kivrak, Ahmet Sener, Yusuf Ziya Asil, Serkan Hazirolan, Tuncay Kaya, Ergun Baris Ozer, Necla Aytemir, Kudret Cardiol Res Pract Research Article INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an important therapeutic option for aortic stenosis (AS) patients who have high surgical risk. TAVR is a complex procedure. Proper preparation of the patient is of significant importance for the final success and affects the morbidity and mortality of the TAVR directly. Pre-TAVR computed tomography is one of the corner stones of these preparation steps, and many patients get some incidental diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this trial, we have investigated 155 patients who had underwent TAVR between February 2013 and March 2017 at Hacettepe University Adult Hospital Cardiology Clinic. RESULTS: Total number of incidental diagnoses was 541, and 451 of them were the first diagnoses. Total number of cardiovascular findings and noncardiovascular findings was 369 and 172, respectively. The most common cardiovascular finding is atherosclerotic heart disease (139, 89.6%). The most common noncardiovascular finding is pulmonary nodule (41, 26.4%). 143 of 155 patients had at least one incidental diagnosis after the reassessment, and 33 different diagnoses were identified with computed tomography. The mean STS-PROM was 8.38% (range 2.8% to 23%), and the mean STS-PROM was calculated 9.4% (range 3.6% to 23%) after the reassessment of computed tomography. CONCLUSION: Preprocedural evaluation is one of the most important steps in TAVR. Computed tomography imaging provides extensive information, not only for procedure planning. Our findings emphasize that computed tomography has a crucial role for the preprocedural evaluation of TAVR candidates. Hindawi 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6466941/ /pubmed/31061731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7478608 Text en Copyright © 2019 Levent Sahiner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sahiner, Levent Coteli, Cem Kivrak, Ahmet Sener, Yusuf Ziya Asil, Serkan Hazirolan, Tuncay Kaya, Ergun Baris Ozer, Necla Aytemir, Kudret Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR |
title | Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR |
title_full | Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR |
title_fullStr | Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR |
title_short | Incidental Findings Diagnosed during Preprocedural Evaluation of TAVR |
title_sort | incidental findings diagnosed during preprocedural evaluation of tavr |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7478608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahinerlevent incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr AT cotelicem incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr AT kivrakahmet incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr AT seneryusufziya incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr AT asilserkan incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr AT hazirolantuncay incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr AT kayaergunbaris incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr AT ozernecla incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr AT aytemirkudret incidentalfindingsdiagnosedduringpreproceduralevaluationoftavr |