Cargando…

Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic instruments based on resonance frequency analysis (RFA) can be utilised to assess dental implant stability during treatment and follow-up. AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of patient- and implant-related factors on implant stability and the 5-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersson, Peter, Pagliani, Luca, Verrocchi, Damiano, Volpe, Stefano, Sahlin, Herman, Sennerby, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3209872
_version_ 1783411210695213056
author Andersson, Peter
Pagliani, Luca
Verrocchi, Damiano
Volpe, Stefano
Sahlin, Herman
Sennerby, Lars
author_facet Andersson, Peter
Pagliani, Luca
Verrocchi, Damiano
Volpe, Stefano
Sahlin, Herman
Sennerby, Lars
author_sort Andersson, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic instruments based on resonance frequency analysis (RFA) can be utilised to assess dental implant stability during treatment and follow-up. AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of patient- and implant-related factors on implant stability and the 5-year implant survival. In addition, the influence of stability (ISQ value) at placement and abutment connection on implant survival was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RFA measurements from a total of 334 consecutive patients with 745 dental implants (Neoss Ltd., Harrogate, UK) were retrospectively analysed after at least 5 years in function. Statistics were used to evaluate the influence of the different variables on implant stability and implant survival. Odds ratio calculations were performed to compare the risk for implant failure using 60, 65, 70, and 75 ISQ as threshold levels at placement and loading. RESULTS: A total of 20 implant failures in 14 patients were noted during the 5 years of follow-up, giving an overall cumulative survival rate (CSR) of 97.3% at the implant level and 95.8% at the patient level. Gender, jaw, position, bone quality, and implant diameter had an influence on implant stability at placement. Jaw, bone quality, and implant diameter had an influence on stability after 3-4 months of healing. More failures were observed in full than in partial rehabilitations. Age, gender, jaw, position, bone quantity, bone quality, implant diameter, and implant length had no influence on implant survival. Implants with ISQ values below the threshold levels showed lower survival rates compared to implants with values above these levels. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed a significantly higher risk for implant failure, showing an ISQ value below 70 and 75 at placement or after 3-4 months of healing. The results indicate that RFA measurements can be used to identify implants with increased risk for failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6466959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64669592019-05-07 Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants Andersson, Peter Pagliani, Luca Verrocchi, Damiano Volpe, Stefano Sahlin, Herman Sennerby, Lars Int J Dent Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnostic instruments based on resonance frequency analysis (RFA) can be utilised to assess dental implant stability during treatment and follow-up. AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of patient- and implant-related factors on implant stability and the 5-year implant survival. In addition, the influence of stability (ISQ value) at placement and abutment connection on implant survival was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RFA measurements from a total of 334 consecutive patients with 745 dental implants (Neoss Ltd., Harrogate, UK) were retrospectively analysed after at least 5 years in function. Statistics were used to evaluate the influence of the different variables on implant stability and implant survival. Odds ratio calculations were performed to compare the risk for implant failure using 60, 65, 70, and 75 ISQ as threshold levels at placement and loading. RESULTS: A total of 20 implant failures in 14 patients were noted during the 5 years of follow-up, giving an overall cumulative survival rate (CSR) of 97.3% at the implant level and 95.8% at the patient level. Gender, jaw, position, bone quality, and implant diameter had an influence on implant stability at placement. Jaw, bone quality, and implant diameter had an influence on stability after 3-4 months of healing. More failures were observed in full than in partial rehabilitations. Age, gender, jaw, position, bone quantity, bone quality, implant diameter, and implant length had no influence on implant survival. Implants with ISQ values below the threshold levels showed lower survival rates compared to implants with values above these levels. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed a significantly higher risk for implant failure, showing an ISQ value below 70 and 75 at placement or after 3-4 months of healing. The results indicate that RFA measurements can be used to identify implants with increased risk for failure. Hindawi 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6466959/ /pubmed/31065267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3209872 Text en Copyright © 2019 Peter Andersson et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Andersson, Peter
Pagliani, Luca
Verrocchi, Damiano
Volpe, Stefano
Sahlin, Herman
Sennerby, Lars
Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants
title Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants
title_full Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants
title_fullStr Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants
title_short Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants
title_sort factors influencing resonance frequency analysis (rfa) measurements and 5-year survival of neoss dental implants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3209872
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonpeter factorsinfluencingresonancefrequencyanalysisrfameasurementsand5yearsurvivalofneossdentalimplants
AT paglianiluca factorsinfluencingresonancefrequencyanalysisrfameasurementsand5yearsurvivalofneossdentalimplants
AT verrocchidamiano factorsinfluencingresonancefrequencyanalysisrfameasurementsand5yearsurvivalofneossdentalimplants
AT volpestefano factorsinfluencingresonancefrequencyanalysisrfameasurementsand5yearsurvivalofneossdentalimplants
AT sahlinherman factorsinfluencingresonancefrequencyanalysisrfameasurementsand5yearsurvivalofneossdentalimplants
AT sennerbylars factorsinfluencingresonancefrequencyanalysisrfameasurementsand5yearsurvivalofneossdentalimplants