Cargando…

Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients

Background: A tibia shaft fracture is one of the most common long bone fractures, with two general types, open fracture and close fracture. However, there is no universally accepted guideline suggesting which treatment to use under certain circumstances. Therefore, a comprehensive network meta-analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Haibo, Yu, Dapeng, Wu, Shaobin, Zhang, Yihang, Ma, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00197
_version_ 1783411219792658432
author Li, Haibo
Yu, Dapeng
Wu, Shaobin
Zhang, Yihang
Ma, Liang
author_facet Li, Haibo
Yu, Dapeng
Wu, Shaobin
Zhang, Yihang
Ma, Liang
author_sort Li, Haibo
collection PubMed
description Background: A tibia shaft fracture is one of the most common long bone fractures, with two general types, open fracture and close fracture. However, there is no universally accepted guideline suggesting which treatment to use under certain circumstances. Therefore, a comprehensive network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to summarize existing studies and to provide more credible data-based medical guidelines. Methods: Available literature was identified by searching medical databases with relevant key terms. Studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline, intervention, and the outcome of treatments, were extracted. A comparative connection of these studies was demonstrated through net plots. Continuous variables and binary variables were reported as mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI), respectively. The comparison of direct and indirect outcome and their P-value were listed in the node-splitting table. Treatments for each endpoint were ranked by their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. A heat plot was created to illustrate the contribution of raw data and the inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons. Results: According to the search strategy, 697 publications were identified, and 25 records were included, involving 3,032 patients with tibia shaft fractures. Seven common surgical or non-surgical treatments, including reamed intramedullary nailing (RIN), un-reamed intramedullary nailing (UIN), minimally reamed intramedullary nailing (MIN), ender nailing (EN), external fixation (EF), plate, and cast, were compared, in terms of time to union, reoperation, non-union, malunion, infection and implant failure. Plate performed relatively better for time to union, while cast might be the best choice in close cases to reduce the risks of reoperation, non-union, malunion, and infection. To prevent implant failure, EN seemed to be better. Conclusion: Cast might have the highest probability of the most optimal choice for tibia shaft fracture in close cases, while reamed intramedullary nailing ranked second.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6467001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64670012019-04-25 Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients Li, Haibo Yu, Dapeng Wu, Shaobin Zhang, Yihang Ma, Liang Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: A tibia shaft fracture is one of the most common long bone fractures, with two general types, open fracture and close fracture. However, there is no universally accepted guideline suggesting which treatment to use under certain circumstances. Therefore, a comprehensive network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to summarize existing studies and to provide more credible data-based medical guidelines. Methods: Available literature was identified by searching medical databases with relevant key terms. Studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline, intervention, and the outcome of treatments, were extracted. A comparative connection of these studies was demonstrated through net plots. Continuous variables and binary variables were reported as mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI), respectively. The comparison of direct and indirect outcome and their P-value were listed in the node-splitting table. Treatments for each endpoint were ranked by their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. A heat plot was created to illustrate the contribution of raw data and the inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons. Results: According to the search strategy, 697 publications were identified, and 25 records were included, involving 3,032 patients with tibia shaft fractures. Seven common surgical or non-surgical treatments, including reamed intramedullary nailing (RIN), un-reamed intramedullary nailing (UIN), minimally reamed intramedullary nailing (MIN), ender nailing (EN), external fixation (EF), plate, and cast, were compared, in terms of time to union, reoperation, non-union, malunion, infection and implant failure. Plate performed relatively better for time to union, while cast might be the best choice in close cases to reduce the risks of reoperation, non-union, malunion, and infection. To prevent implant failure, EN seemed to be better. Conclusion: Cast might have the highest probability of the most optimal choice for tibia shaft fracture in close cases, while reamed intramedullary nailing ranked second. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6467001/ /pubmed/31024295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00197 Text en Copyright © 2019 Li, Yu, Wu, Zhang and Ma. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Li, Haibo
Yu, Dapeng
Wu, Shaobin
Zhang, Yihang
Ma, Liang
Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients
title Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients
title_full Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients
title_fullStr Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients
title_short Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients
title_sort multiple comparisons of the efficacy and safety for seven treatments in tibia shaft fracture patients
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00197
work_keys_str_mv AT lihaibo multiplecomparisonsoftheefficacyandsafetyforseventreatmentsintibiashaftfracturepatients
AT yudapeng multiplecomparisonsoftheefficacyandsafetyforseventreatmentsintibiashaftfracturepatients
AT wushaobin multiplecomparisonsoftheefficacyandsafetyforseventreatmentsintibiashaftfracturepatients
AT zhangyihang multiplecomparisonsoftheefficacyandsafetyforseventreatmentsintibiashaftfracturepatients
AT maliang multiplecomparisonsoftheefficacyandsafetyforseventreatmentsintibiashaftfracturepatients