Cargando…

Fracture Healing Monitoring by Impact Tests: Single Case Study of a Fractured Tibia With External Fixator

The correct evaluation of the healing process is important to define proper times of fixator dynamization and removal, avoiding refractures. Unfortunately, a quantitative healing assessment is not yet available in clinical practice. The aim of the paper is to prove the feasibility of the mechanical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IEEE 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2019.2901455
_version_ 1783411238224527360
collection PubMed
description The correct evaluation of the healing process is important to define proper times of fixator dynamization and removal, avoiding refractures. Unfortunately, a quantitative healing assessment is not yet available in clinical practice. The aim of the paper is to prove the feasibility of the mechanical vibration method to assess bone healing in fractures treated with external fixation, in in vivo conditions. The case study was a patient with a tibial fracture treated with a monoaxial fixator. The healing process was monitored for three months through a series of five impact tests. The pins screwed into the bone were used both to excite and measure vibrations. Fracture healing was quantitatively assessed by estimating the resonant frequencies of the leg. The first frequency increased of about 4% per week during the observation period. After the hard callus formation (13 week), also other frequencies increased within the range 1%–6% per week. X-ray observations confirmed the healing progress and proved the method potentiality. In addition, the vibratory response of the leg after fixator removal was evaluated and resulted characterized by five modes in the bandwidth 0–1000 Hz. The results suggest that the vibratory response of a fractured bone treated with external fixation can be a promising indicator for quantitative healing monitoring. The mechanical vibration method could be helpful for reducing X-ray exposure of patients and could be performed more frequently, as desirable for obtaining more attentive monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6467180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher IEEE
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64671802019-04-18 Fracture Healing Monitoring by Impact Tests: Single Case Study of a Fractured Tibia With External Fixator IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Article The correct evaluation of the healing process is important to define proper times of fixator dynamization and removal, avoiding refractures. Unfortunately, a quantitative healing assessment is not yet available in clinical practice. The aim of the paper is to prove the feasibility of the mechanical vibration method to assess bone healing in fractures treated with external fixation, in in vivo conditions. The case study was a patient with a tibial fracture treated with a monoaxial fixator. The healing process was monitored for three months through a series of five impact tests. The pins screwed into the bone were used both to excite and measure vibrations. Fracture healing was quantitatively assessed by estimating the resonant frequencies of the leg. The first frequency increased of about 4% per week during the observation period. After the hard callus formation (13 week), also other frequencies increased within the range 1%–6% per week. X-ray observations confirmed the healing progress and proved the method potentiality. In addition, the vibratory response of the leg after fixator removal was evaluated and resulted characterized by five modes in the bandwidth 0–1000 Hz. The results suggest that the vibratory response of a fractured bone treated with external fixation can be a promising indicator for quantitative healing monitoring. The mechanical vibration method could be helpful for reducing X-ray exposure of patients and could be performed more frequently, as desirable for obtaining more attentive monitoring. IEEE 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6467180/ /pubmed/31001457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2019.2901455 Text en 2168-2372 © 2019 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only. Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
spellingShingle Article
Fracture Healing Monitoring by Impact Tests: Single Case Study of a Fractured Tibia With External Fixator
title Fracture Healing Monitoring by Impact Tests: Single Case Study of a Fractured Tibia With External Fixator
title_full Fracture Healing Monitoring by Impact Tests: Single Case Study of a Fractured Tibia With External Fixator
title_fullStr Fracture Healing Monitoring by Impact Tests: Single Case Study of a Fractured Tibia With External Fixator
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Healing Monitoring by Impact Tests: Single Case Study of a Fractured Tibia With External Fixator
title_short Fracture Healing Monitoring by Impact Tests: Single Case Study of a Fractured Tibia With External Fixator
title_sort fracture healing monitoring by impact tests: single case study of a fractured tibia with external fixator
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2019.2901455
work_keys_str_mv AT fracturehealingmonitoringbyimpacttestssinglecasestudyofafracturedtibiawithexternalfixator
AT fracturehealingmonitoringbyimpacttestssinglecasestudyofafracturedtibiawithexternalfixator
AT fracturehealingmonitoringbyimpacttestssinglecasestudyofafracturedtibiawithexternalfixator