Cargando…

Risk Assessment of Drometrizole, a Cosmetic Ingredient used as an Ultraviolet Light Absorber

As the use of cosmetics has greatly increased in a daily life, safety issues with cosmetic ingredients have drawn an attention. Drometrizole [2-(2′-hydroxy-5′-methylphenyl)benzotriazole] is categorized as a sunscreen ingredient and is used in cosmetics and non-cosmetics as a UV light absorber. No si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jae Kwon, Kim, Kyu-Bong, Lee, Jung Dae, Shin, Chan Young, Kwack, Seung Jun, Lee, Byung-Mu, Lee, Joo Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Toxicology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015894
http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.119
_version_ 1783411255371890688
author Lee, Jae Kwon
Kim, Kyu-Bong
Lee, Jung Dae
Shin, Chan Young
Kwack, Seung Jun
Lee, Byung-Mu
Lee, Joo Young
author_facet Lee, Jae Kwon
Kim, Kyu-Bong
Lee, Jung Dae
Shin, Chan Young
Kwack, Seung Jun
Lee, Byung-Mu
Lee, Joo Young
author_sort Lee, Jae Kwon
collection PubMed
description As the use of cosmetics has greatly increased in a daily life, safety issues with cosmetic ingredients have drawn an attention. Drometrizole [2-(2′-hydroxy-5′-methylphenyl)benzotriazole] is categorized as a sunscreen ingredient and is used in cosmetics and non-cosmetics as a UV light absorber. No significant toxicity has been observed in acute oral, inhalation, or dermal toxicity studies. In a 13-week oral toxicity study in beagle dogs, No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was determined as 31.75 mg/kg bw/day in males and 34.6 mg/kg bw/day in females, based on increased serum alanine aminotransferase activity. Although drometrizole was negative for skin sensitization in two Magnusson-Kligman maximization tests in guinea pigs, there were two case reports of consumers presenting with allergic contact dermatitis. Drometrizole showed no teratogenicity in reproductive and developmental toxicity studies in which rats and mice were treated for 6 to 15 days of the gestation period. Ames tests showed that drometrizole was not mutagenic. A long-term carcinogenicity study using mice and rats showed no significant carcinogenic effect. A nail product containing 0.03% drometrizole was nonirritating, non-sensitizing and non-photosensitizing in a test with 147 human subjects. For risk assessment, the NOAEL chosen was 31.75 mg/kg bw/day in a 13-week oral toxicity study. Systemic exposure dosages were 0.27228 mg/kg bw/day and 1.90598 mg/kg bw/day for 1% and 7% drometrizole in cosmetics, respectively. Risk characterization studies demonstrated that when cosmetic products contain 1.0% of drometrizole, the margin of safety was greater than 100. Based on the risk assessment data, the MFDS revised the regulatory concentration of drometrizole from 7% to 1% in 2015. Under current regulation, drometrizole is considered to be safe for use in cosmetics. If new toxicological data are obtained in the future, the risk assessment should be carried out to update the appropriate guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6467354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Toxicology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64673542019-04-23 Risk Assessment of Drometrizole, a Cosmetic Ingredient used as an Ultraviolet Light Absorber Lee, Jae Kwon Kim, Kyu-Bong Lee, Jung Dae Shin, Chan Young Kwack, Seung Jun Lee, Byung-Mu Lee, Joo Young Toxicol Res Invited Review As the use of cosmetics has greatly increased in a daily life, safety issues with cosmetic ingredients have drawn an attention. Drometrizole [2-(2′-hydroxy-5′-methylphenyl)benzotriazole] is categorized as a sunscreen ingredient and is used in cosmetics and non-cosmetics as a UV light absorber. No significant toxicity has been observed in acute oral, inhalation, or dermal toxicity studies. In a 13-week oral toxicity study in beagle dogs, No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was determined as 31.75 mg/kg bw/day in males and 34.6 mg/kg bw/day in females, based on increased serum alanine aminotransferase activity. Although drometrizole was negative for skin sensitization in two Magnusson-Kligman maximization tests in guinea pigs, there were two case reports of consumers presenting with allergic contact dermatitis. Drometrizole showed no teratogenicity in reproductive and developmental toxicity studies in which rats and mice were treated for 6 to 15 days of the gestation period. Ames tests showed that drometrizole was not mutagenic. A long-term carcinogenicity study using mice and rats showed no significant carcinogenic effect. A nail product containing 0.03% drometrizole was nonirritating, non-sensitizing and non-photosensitizing in a test with 147 human subjects. For risk assessment, the NOAEL chosen was 31.75 mg/kg bw/day in a 13-week oral toxicity study. Systemic exposure dosages were 0.27228 mg/kg bw/day and 1.90598 mg/kg bw/day for 1% and 7% drometrizole in cosmetics, respectively. Risk characterization studies demonstrated that when cosmetic products contain 1.0% of drometrizole, the margin of safety was greater than 100. Based on the risk assessment data, the MFDS revised the regulatory concentration of drometrizole from 7% to 1% in 2015. Under current regulation, drometrizole is considered to be safe for use in cosmetics. If new toxicological data are obtained in the future, the risk assessment should be carried out to update the appropriate guidelines. Korean Society of Toxicology 2019-04 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6467354/ /pubmed/31015894 http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.119 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Society Of Toxicology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Lee, Jae Kwon
Kim, Kyu-Bong
Lee, Jung Dae
Shin, Chan Young
Kwack, Seung Jun
Lee, Byung-Mu
Lee, Joo Young
Risk Assessment of Drometrizole, a Cosmetic Ingredient used as an Ultraviolet Light Absorber
title Risk Assessment of Drometrizole, a Cosmetic Ingredient used as an Ultraviolet Light Absorber
title_full Risk Assessment of Drometrizole, a Cosmetic Ingredient used as an Ultraviolet Light Absorber
title_fullStr Risk Assessment of Drometrizole, a Cosmetic Ingredient used as an Ultraviolet Light Absorber
title_full_unstemmed Risk Assessment of Drometrizole, a Cosmetic Ingredient used as an Ultraviolet Light Absorber
title_short Risk Assessment of Drometrizole, a Cosmetic Ingredient used as an Ultraviolet Light Absorber
title_sort risk assessment of drometrizole, a cosmetic ingredient used as an ultraviolet light absorber
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015894
http://dx.doi.org/10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.119
work_keys_str_mv AT leejaekwon riskassessmentofdrometrizoleacosmeticingredientusedasanultravioletlightabsorber
AT kimkyubong riskassessmentofdrometrizoleacosmeticingredientusedasanultravioletlightabsorber
AT leejungdae riskassessmentofdrometrizoleacosmeticingredientusedasanultravioletlightabsorber
AT shinchanyoung riskassessmentofdrometrizoleacosmeticingredientusedasanultravioletlightabsorber
AT kwackseungjun riskassessmentofdrometrizoleacosmeticingredientusedasanultravioletlightabsorber
AT leebyungmu riskassessmentofdrometrizoleacosmeticingredientusedasanultravioletlightabsorber
AT leejooyoung riskassessmentofdrometrizoleacosmeticingredientusedasanultravioletlightabsorber