Cargando…

Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate

BACKGROUND: Fat grafting is a growing field within plastic surgery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and stromal vascular fracture (SVF) may have a role in fat graft survival. Our group previously demonstrated a detrimental effect on ASC survival by the lidocaine used in tumescent solution. Sodium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francis, Ashish, Wang, Wei Z., Goldman, Joshua J., Fang, Xin-Hua, Williams, Shelley J., Baynosa, Richard C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002138
_version_ 1783411294914740224
author Francis, Ashish
Wang, Wei Z.
Goldman, Joshua J.
Fang, Xin-Hua
Williams, Shelley J.
Baynosa, Richard C.
author_facet Francis, Ashish
Wang, Wei Z.
Goldman, Joshua J.
Fang, Xin-Hua
Williams, Shelley J.
Baynosa, Richard C.
author_sort Francis, Ashish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fat grafting is a growing field within plastic surgery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and stromal vascular fracture (SVF) may have a role in fat graft survival. Our group previously demonstrated a detrimental effect on ASC survival by the lidocaine used in tumescent solution. Sodium bicarbonate (SB) buffers the acidity of lidocaine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SB buffering is a practical method to reduce ASC and SVF apoptosis and necrosis seen with common lidocaine-containing tumescent solution. METHODS: Human patients undergoing bilateral liposuction for any indication were included in this study. An internally controlled, split-body design was utilized. Tumescent liposuction on one side of the body was conducted with tumescent containing lidocaine. On the opposite side, liposuction was conducted by adding SB to the tumescent. Tumescent solution and lipoaspirate pH were measured. Lipoaspirate from each side was processed for SVF isolation and ASC culture. The number of viable ASCs was counted and SVF apoptosis/necrosis was examined. RESULTS: The pH of the SB-buffered tumescent was significantly higher than that of the standard tumescent, an effect also seen in the lipoaspirate. Adipose-derived stem cell survival in the SB-buffered lipoaspirate was approximately 53% higher. However, there was no significant difference in SVF apoptosis and necrosis between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The acidic standard tumescent solution commonly used in liposuction diminishes ASC viability from lipoaspirates. Sodium bicarbonate buffering tumescent solution can enhance ASC viability, but does not affect SVF apoptosis and necrosis. We recommend buffering tumescent with SB to potentially improve fat graft take. Our findings advocate for further research investigating mechanisms and optimal harvest techniques that maximize SVF/ASC survival and the clinical effect on overall fat graft viability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6467607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64676072019-05-01 Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate Francis, Ashish Wang, Wei Z. Goldman, Joshua J. Fang, Xin-Hua Williams, Shelley J. Baynosa, Richard C. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Experimental BACKGROUND: Fat grafting is a growing field within plastic surgery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and stromal vascular fracture (SVF) may have a role in fat graft survival. Our group previously demonstrated a detrimental effect on ASC survival by the lidocaine used in tumescent solution. Sodium bicarbonate (SB) buffers the acidity of lidocaine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SB buffering is a practical method to reduce ASC and SVF apoptosis and necrosis seen with common lidocaine-containing tumescent solution. METHODS: Human patients undergoing bilateral liposuction for any indication were included in this study. An internally controlled, split-body design was utilized. Tumescent liposuction on one side of the body was conducted with tumescent containing lidocaine. On the opposite side, liposuction was conducted by adding SB to the tumescent. Tumescent solution and lipoaspirate pH were measured. Lipoaspirate from each side was processed for SVF isolation and ASC culture. The number of viable ASCs was counted and SVF apoptosis/necrosis was examined. RESULTS: The pH of the SB-buffered tumescent was significantly higher than that of the standard tumescent, an effect also seen in the lipoaspirate. Adipose-derived stem cell survival in the SB-buffered lipoaspirate was approximately 53% higher. However, there was no significant difference in SVF apoptosis and necrosis between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The acidic standard tumescent solution commonly used in liposuction diminishes ASC viability from lipoaspirates. Sodium bicarbonate buffering tumescent solution can enhance ASC viability, but does not affect SVF apoptosis and necrosis. We recommend buffering tumescent with SB to potentially improve fat graft take. Our findings advocate for further research investigating mechanisms and optimal harvest techniques that maximize SVF/ASC survival and the clinical effect on overall fat graft viability. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6467607/ /pubmed/31044114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002138 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Experimental
Francis, Ashish
Wang, Wei Z.
Goldman, Joshua J.
Fang, Xin-Hua
Williams, Shelley J.
Baynosa, Richard C.
Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate
title Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate
title_full Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate
title_fullStr Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate
title_full_unstemmed Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate
title_short Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate
title_sort enhancement of viable adipose-derived stem cells in lipoaspirate by buffering tumescent with sodium bicarbonate
topic Experimental
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002138
work_keys_str_mv AT francisashish enhancementofviableadiposederivedstemcellsinlipoaspiratebybufferingtumescentwithsodiumbicarbonate
AT wangweiz enhancementofviableadiposederivedstemcellsinlipoaspiratebybufferingtumescentwithsodiumbicarbonate
AT goldmanjoshuaj enhancementofviableadiposederivedstemcellsinlipoaspiratebybufferingtumescentwithsodiumbicarbonate
AT fangxinhua enhancementofviableadiposederivedstemcellsinlipoaspiratebybufferingtumescentwithsodiumbicarbonate
AT williamsshelleyj enhancementofviableadiposederivedstemcellsinlipoaspiratebybufferingtumescentwithsodiumbicarbonate
AT baynosarichardc enhancementofviableadiposederivedstemcellsinlipoaspiratebybufferingtumescentwithsodiumbicarbonate