Cargando…

Differences in Chest Measurements between the Cis-female and Trans-female Chest Exposed to Estrogen and Its Implications for Breast Augmentation

BACKGROUND: Gender confirming primary breast augmentation is becoming more common. The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic and anatomical differences in cis-female and trans-female populations. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of trans-female patients and cis-female patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nauta, Allison C., Baltrusch, Kyle M., Heston, Aaron L., Narayan, Sasha K., Gunther, Sven, Esmonde, Nick O., Blume, Kylie S., Mueller, Reid V., Hansen, Juliana E., Berli, Jens Urs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002167
_version_ 1783411297242578944
author Nauta, Allison C.
Baltrusch, Kyle M.
Heston, Aaron L.
Narayan, Sasha K.
Gunther, Sven
Esmonde, Nick O.
Blume, Kylie S.
Mueller, Reid V.
Hansen, Juliana E.
Berli, Jens Urs
author_facet Nauta, Allison C.
Baltrusch, Kyle M.
Heston, Aaron L.
Narayan, Sasha K.
Gunther, Sven
Esmonde, Nick O.
Blume, Kylie S.
Mueller, Reid V.
Hansen, Juliana E.
Berli, Jens Urs
author_sort Nauta, Allison C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gender confirming primary breast augmentation is becoming more common. The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic and anatomical differences in cis-female and trans-female populations. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of trans-female patients and cis-female patients undergoing primary breast augmentation at a single institution. Analysis included patient demographics and preoperative chest measurements including sternal notch to nipple distance (SSN), breast width (BW), nipple to inframammary fold distance (N-IMF), and nipple to midline distance (N-M). Continuous variables were compared using independent t tests, and discrete variables were compared using Pearson’s χ(2) tests. RESULTS: Eighty-two trans-female and 188 cis-female patients undergoing primary breast augmentation were included. Trans-female patients were older (40.37 versus 34.07), more likely to have psychological comorbidities (50% versus 12.23%), and had a higher body mass index, 27.46 kg/m(2) versus 22.88 kg/m(2) (P = 1.91E-07), than cis-female patients. Cis-female patients most commonly had an ectomorph body habitus (52% versus 26%), whereas trans-female patients most commonly had an endomorph body habitus (40% versus 7%). Pseudoptosis or ptosis was more commonly seen in cis-female patients (P = 0.0056). There were significant differences in preoperative breast measurements including sternal notch to nipple distance, BW, and N-M between groups, but not in N-IMF. The ratio of BW/N-IMF was statistically significant (P = 2.65E-07 on right), indicating that the similarity in N-IMF distance did not adjust for the difference in BW. CONCLUSIONS: The trans-female and cis-female populations seeking primary breast augmentation have significant demographic and anatomical differences. This has implications for surgical decision-making and planning to optimize outcomes for trans-female patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6467617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64676172019-05-01 Differences in Chest Measurements between the Cis-female and Trans-female Chest Exposed to Estrogen and Its Implications for Breast Augmentation Nauta, Allison C. Baltrusch, Kyle M. Heston, Aaron L. Narayan, Sasha K. Gunther, Sven Esmonde, Nick O. Blume, Kylie S. Mueller, Reid V. Hansen, Juliana E. Berli, Jens Urs Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Gender confirming primary breast augmentation is becoming more common. The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic and anatomical differences in cis-female and trans-female populations. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of trans-female patients and cis-female patients undergoing primary breast augmentation at a single institution. Analysis included patient demographics and preoperative chest measurements including sternal notch to nipple distance (SSN), breast width (BW), nipple to inframammary fold distance (N-IMF), and nipple to midline distance (N-M). Continuous variables were compared using independent t tests, and discrete variables were compared using Pearson’s χ(2) tests. RESULTS: Eighty-two trans-female and 188 cis-female patients undergoing primary breast augmentation were included. Trans-female patients were older (40.37 versus 34.07), more likely to have psychological comorbidities (50% versus 12.23%), and had a higher body mass index, 27.46 kg/m(2) versus 22.88 kg/m(2) (P = 1.91E-07), than cis-female patients. Cis-female patients most commonly had an ectomorph body habitus (52% versus 26%), whereas trans-female patients most commonly had an endomorph body habitus (40% versus 7%). Pseudoptosis or ptosis was more commonly seen in cis-female patients (P = 0.0056). There were significant differences in preoperative breast measurements including sternal notch to nipple distance, BW, and N-M between groups, but not in N-IMF. The ratio of BW/N-IMF was statistically significant (P = 2.65E-07 on right), indicating that the similarity in N-IMF distance did not adjust for the difference in BW. CONCLUSIONS: The trans-female and cis-female populations seeking primary breast augmentation have significant demographic and anatomical differences. This has implications for surgical decision-making and planning to optimize outcomes for trans-female patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6467617/ /pubmed/31044128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002167 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nauta, Allison C.
Baltrusch, Kyle M.
Heston, Aaron L.
Narayan, Sasha K.
Gunther, Sven
Esmonde, Nick O.
Blume, Kylie S.
Mueller, Reid V.
Hansen, Juliana E.
Berli, Jens Urs
Differences in Chest Measurements between the Cis-female and Trans-female Chest Exposed to Estrogen and Its Implications for Breast Augmentation
title Differences in Chest Measurements between the Cis-female and Trans-female Chest Exposed to Estrogen and Its Implications for Breast Augmentation
title_full Differences in Chest Measurements between the Cis-female and Trans-female Chest Exposed to Estrogen and Its Implications for Breast Augmentation
title_fullStr Differences in Chest Measurements between the Cis-female and Trans-female Chest Exposed to Estrogen and Its Implications for Breast Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Chest Measurements between the Cis-female and Trans-female Chest Exposed to Estrogen and Its Implications for Breast Augmentation
title_short Differences in Chest Measurements between the Cis-female and Trans-female Chest Exposed to Estrogen and Its Implications for Breast Augmentation
title_sort differences in chest measurements between the cis-female and trans-female chest exposed to estrogen and its implications for breast augmentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002167
work_keys_str_mv AT nautaallisonc differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT baltruschkylem differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT hestonaaronl differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT narayansashak differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT gunthersven differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT esmondenicko differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT blumekylies differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT muellerreidv differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT hansenjulianae differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation
AT berlijensurs differencesinchestmeasurementsbetweenthecisfemaleandtransfemalechestexposedtoestrogenanditsimplicationsforbreastaugmentation