Cargando…

Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability

BACKGROUND: Peak Torque (PT), Rate of Torque Development (RTD) and Average Torque (AT) over a single contraction assess the three components of muscle function during isometric contractions. Surprisingly, AT has never been reported or its reliability confirmed. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to establi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simpson, Daniel, Ehrensberger, Monika, Nulty, Christopher, Regan, Joanne, Broderick, Patrick, Blake, Catherine, Monaghan, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Scientific Publishing Pte Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1013702519500069
_version_ 1783411305121579008
author Simpson, Daniel
Ehrensberger, Monika
Nulty, Christopher
Regan, Joanne
Broderick, Patrick
Blake, Catherine
Monaghan, Kenneth
author_facet Simpson, Daniel
Ehrensberger, Monika
Nulty, Christopher
Regan, Joanne
Broderick, Patrick
Blake, Catherine
Monaghan, Kenneth
author_sort Simpson, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peak Torque (PT), Rate of Torque Development (RTD) and Average Torque (AT) over a single contraction assess the three components of muscle function during isometric contractions. Surprisingly, AT has never been reported or its reliability confirmed. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to establish protocol reliability for ankle dorsiflexion and elbow extension isometric muscle function (PT, RTD, AT) in healthy participants using the Biodex System 3 Dynamometer. METHODS: Twelve participants (6 male, 6 female, mean age [Formula: see text] years) performed four maximal isometric contractions on two occasions. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Typical Error (TE) and Coefficient of Variation (CV) for PT, RTD and AT were reported. RESULTS: The ICC for all strength parameters varied from 0.98–0.92. TE for ankle dorsiflexion PT was 1.38 Nm, RTD 7.43 Nm/s and AT 1.33 Nm, CV varied from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. For elbow extension, TE was 3.36 Nm for PT, 14.87 Nm/s for RTD and 3.03 Nm for AT, CV varied from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSION: Maximal isometric ankle dorsiflexion and elbow extension PT, RTD and AT can be evaluated with excellent reliability when following the described protocol. This testing procedure, including the application of AT, can be confidently applied in research, exercise or clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6467829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher World Scientific Publishing Pte Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64678292019-06-01 Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability Simpson, Daniel Ehrensberger, Monika Nulty, Christopher Regan, Joanne Broderick, Patrick Blake, Catherine Monaghan, Kenneth Hong Kong Physiother J Research Paper BACKGROUND: Peak Torque (PT), Rate of Torque Development (RTD) and Average Torque (AT) over a single contraction assess the three components of muscle function during isometric contractions. Surprisingly, AT has never been reported or its reliability confirmed. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to establish protocol reliability for ankle dorsiflexion and elbow extension isometric muscle function (PT, RTD, AT) in healthy participants using the Biodex System 3 Dynamometer. METHODS: Twelve participants (6 male, 6 female, mean age [Formula: see text] years) performed four maximal isometric contractions on two occasions. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Typical Error (TE) and Coefficient of Variation (CV) for PT, RTD and AT were reported. RESULTS: The ICC for all strength parameters varied from 0.98–0.92. TE for ankle dorsiflexion PT was 1.38 Nm, RTD 7.43 Nm/s and AT 1.33 Nm, CV varied from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. For elbow extension, TE was 3.36 Nm for PT, 14.87 Nm/s for RTD and 3.03 Nm for AT, CV varied from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSION: Maximal isometric ankle dorsiflexion and elbow extension PT, RTD and AT can be evaluated with excellent reliability when following the described protocol. This testing procedure, including the application of AT, can be confidently applied in research, exercise or clinical settings. World Scientific Publishing Pte Ltd 2019-06 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6467829/ /pubmed/31156318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1013702519500069 Text en © 2019, Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Simpson, Daniel
Ehrensberger, Monika
Nulty, Christopher
Regan, Joanne
Broderick, Patrick
Blake, Catherine
Monaghan, Kenneth
Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability
title Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability
title_full Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability
title_fullStr Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability
title_full_unstemmed Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability
title_short Peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability
title_sort peak torque, rate of torque development and average torque of isometric ankle and elbow contractions show excellent test–retest reliability
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1013702519500069
work_keys_str_mv AT simpsondaniel peaktorquerateoftorquedevelopmentandaveragetorqueofisometricankleandelbowcontractionsshowexcellenttestretestreliability
AT ehrensbergermonika peaktorquerateoftorquedevelopmentandaveragetorqueofisometricankleandelbowcontractionsshowexcellenttestretestreliability
AT nultychristopher peaktorquerateoftorquedevelopmentandaveragetorqueofisometricankleandelbowcontractionsshowexcellenttestretestreliability
AT reganjoanne peaktorquerateoftorquedevelopmentandaveragetorqueofisometricankleandelbowcontractionsshowexcellenttestretestreliability
AT broderickpatrick peaktorquerateoftorquedevelopmentandaveragetorqueofisometricankleandelbowcontractionsshowexcellenttestretestreliability
AT blakecatherine peaktorquerateoftorquedevelopmentandaveragetorqueofisometricankleandelbowcontractionsshowexcellenttestretestreliability
AT monaghankenneth peaktorquerateoftorquedevelopmentandaveragetorqueofisometricankleandelbowcontractionsshowexcellenttestretestreliability