Cargando…

Proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential

Human mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) secretomes have shown to influence the microenvironment upon injury, promoting cytoprotection, angiogenesis, and tissue repair. The angiogenic potential is of particular interest for the treatment of ischemic diseases. Interestingly, hMSC secretomes isolated fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kehl, Debora, Generali, Melanie, Mallone, Anna, Heller, Manfred, Uldry, Anne-Christine, Cheng, Phil, Gantenbein, Benjamin, Hoerstrup, Simon P., Weber, Benedikt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-019-0070-y
_version_ 1783411322844610560
author Kehl, Debora
Generali, Melanie
Mallone, Anna
Heller, Manfred
Uldry, Anne-Christine
Cheng, Phil
Gantenbein, Benjamin
Hoerstrup, Simon P.
Weber, Benedikt
author_facet Kehl, Debora
Generali, Melanie
Mallone, Anna
Heller, Manfred
Uldry, Anne-Christine
Cheng, Phil
Gantenbein, Benjamin
Hoerstrup, Simon P.
Weber, Benedikt
author_sort Kehl, Debora
collection PubMed
description Human mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) secretomes have shown to influence the microenvironment upon injury, promoting cytoprotection, angiogenesis, and tissue repair. The angiogenic potential is of particular interest for the treatment of ischemic diseases. Interestingly, hMSC secretomes isolated from different tissue sources have shown dissimilarities with respect to their angiogenic profile. This study compares angiogenesis of hMSC secretomes from adipose tissue (hADSCs), bone marrow (hBMSCs), and umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly (hWJSCs). hMSC secretomes were obtained under xenofree conditions and analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS). Biological processes related to angiogenesis were found to be enriched in the proteomic profile of hMSC secretomes. hWJSC secretomes revealed a more complete angiogenic network with higher concentrations of angiogenesis related proteins, followed by hBMSC secretomes. hADSC secretomes lacked central angiogenic proteins and expressed most detected proteins to a significantly lower level. In vivo all secretomes induced vascularization of subcutaneously implanted Matrigel plugs in mice. Differences in secretome composition were functionally analyzed with monocyte and endothelial cell (EC) in vitro co-culture experiments using vi-SNE based multidimensional flow cytometry data analysis. Functional responses between hBMSC and hWJSC secretomes were comparable, with significantly higher migration of CD14(++) CD16(−) monocytes and enhanced macrophage differentiation compared with hADSC secretomes. Both secretomes also induced a more profound pro-angiogenic phenotype of ECs. These results suggest hWJSCs secretome as the most potent hMSC source for inflammation-mediated angiogenesis induction, while the potency of hADSC secretomes was lowest. This systematic analysis may have implication on the selection of hMSCs for future clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6467904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64679042019-04-23 Proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential Kehl, Debora Generali, Melanie Mallone, Anna Heller, Manfred Uldry, Anne-Christine Cheng, Phil Gantenbein, Benjamin Hoerstrup, Simon P. Weber, Benedikt NPJ Regen Med Article Human mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) secretomes have shown to influence the microenvironment upon injury, promoting cytoprotection, angiogenesis, and tissue repair. The angiogenic potential is of particular interest for the treatment of ischemic diseases. Interestingly, hMSC secretomes isolated from different tissue sources have shown dissimilarities with respect to their angiogenic profile. This study compares angiogenesis of hMSC secretomes from adipose tissue (hADSCs), bone marrow (hBMSCs), and umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly (hWJSCs). hMSC secretomes were obtained under xenofree conditions and analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS). Biological processes related to angiogenesis were found to be enriched in the proteomic profile of hMSC secretomes. hWJSC secretomes revealed a more complete angiogenic network with higher concentrations of angiogenesis related proteins, followed by hBMSC secretomes. hADSC secretomes lacked central angiogenic proteins and expressed most detected proteins to a significantly lower level. In vivo all secretomes induced vascularization of subcutaneously implanted Matrigel plugs in mice. Differences in secretome composition were functionally analyzed with monocyte and endothelial cell (EC) in vitro co-culture experiments using vi-SNE based multidimensional flow cytometry data analysis. Functional responses between hBMSC and hWJSC secretomes were comparable, with significantly higher migration of CD14(++) CD16(−) monocytes and enhanced macrophage differentiation compared with hADSC secretomes. Both secretomes also induced a more profound pro-angiogenic phenotype of ECs. These results suggest hWJSCs secretome as the most potent hMSC source for inflammation-mediated angiogenesis induction, while the potency of hADSC secretomes was lowest. This systematic analysis may have implication on the selection of hMSCs for future clinical studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6467904/ /pubmed/31016031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-019-0070-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kehl, Debora
Generali, Melanie
Mallone, Anna
Heller, Manfred
Uldry, Anne-Christine
Cheng, Phil
Gantenbein, Benjamin
Hoerstrup, Simon P.
Weber, Benedikt
Proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential
title Proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential
title_full Proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential
title_fullStr Proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential
title_full_unstemmed Proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential
title_short Proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential
title_sort proteomic analysis of human mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes: a systematic comparison of the angiogenic potential
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6467904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-019-0070-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kehldebora proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential
AT generalimelanie proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential
AT malloneanna proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential
AT hellermanfred proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential
AT uldryannechristine proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential
AT chengphil proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential
AT gantenbeinbenjamin proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential
AT hoerstrupsimonp proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential
AT weberbenedikt proteomicanalysisofhumanmesenchymalstromalcellsecretomesasystematiccomparisonoftheangiogenicpotential