Cargando…

Hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (Anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (Anolis porcatus)

In allopatric species, reproductive isolation evolves through the accumulation of genetic incompatibilities. The degree of divergence required for complete reproductive isolation is highly variable across taxa, which makes the outcome of secondary contact between allopatric species unpredictable. Si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wegener, Johanna E., Pita‐Aquino, Jessica N., Atutubo, Jessica, Moreno, Adam, Kolbe, Jason J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5042
_version_ 1783411359185108992
author Wegener, Johanna E.
Pita‐Aquino, Jessica N.
Atutubo, Jessica
Moreno, Adam
Kolbe, Jason J.
author_facet Wegener, Johanna E.
Pita‐Aquino, Jessica N.
Atutubo, Jessica
Moreno, Adam
Kolbe, Jason J.
author_sort Wegener, Johanna E.
collection PubMed
description In allopatric species, reproductive isolation evolves through the accumulation of genetic incompatibilities. The degree of divergence required for complete reproductive isolation is highly variable across taxa, which makes the outcome of secondary contact between allopatric species unpredictable. Since before the Pliocene, two species of Anolis lizards, Anolis carolinensis and Anolis porcatus, have been allopatric, yet this period of independent evolution has not led to substantial species‐specific morphological differentiation, and therefore, they might not be reproductively isolated. In this study, we determined the genetic consequences of localized, secondary contact between the native green anole, A. carolinensis, and the introduced Cuban green anole, A. porcatus, in South Miami. Using 18 microsatellite markers, we found that the South Miami population formed a genetic cluster distinct from both parental species. Mitochondrial DNA revealed maternal A. porcatus ancestry for 35% of the individuals sampled from this population, indicating a high degree of cytonuclear discordance. Thus, hybridization with A. porcatus, not just population structure within A. carolinensis, may be responsible for the genetic distinctiveness of this population. Using tree‐based maximum‐likelihood analysis, we found support for a more recent, secondary introduction of A. porcatus to Florida. Evidence that ~33% of the nuclear DNA resulted from a secondary introduction supports the hybrid origin of the green anole population in South Miami. We used multiple lines of evidence and multiple genetic markers to reconstruct otherwise cryptic patterns of species introduction and hybridization. Genetic evidence for a lack of reproductive isolation, as well as morphological similarities between the two species, supports revising the taxonomy of A. carolinensis to include A. porcatus from western Cuba. Future studies should target the current geographic extent of introgression originating from the past injection of genetic material from Cuban green anoles and determine the consequences for the evolutionary trajectory of green anole populations in southern Florida.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6468060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64680602019-04-23 Hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (Anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (Anolis porcatus) Wegener, Johanna E. Pita‐Aquino, Jessica N. Atutubo, Jessica Moreno, Adam Kolbe, Jason J. Ecol Evol Original Research In allopatric species, reproductive isolation evolves through the accumulation of genetic incompatibilities. The degree of divergence required for complete reproductive isolation is highly variable across taxa, which makes the outcome of secondary contact between allopatric species unpredictable. Since before the Pliocene, two species of Anolis lizards, Anolis carolinensis and Anolis porcatus, have been allopatric, yet this period of independent evolution has not led to substantial species‐specific morphological differentiation, and therefore, they might not be reproductively isolated. In this study, we determined the genetic consequences of localized, secondary contact between the native green anole, A. carolinensis, and the introduced Cuban green anole, A. porcatus, in South Miami. Using 18 microsatellite markers, we found that the South Miami population formed a genetic cluster distinct from both parental species. Mitochondrial DNA revealed maternal A. porcatus ancestry for 35% of the individuals sampled from this population, indicating a high degree of cytonuclear discordance. Thus, hybridization with A. porcatus, not just population structure within A. carolinensis, may be responsible for the genetic distinctiveness of this population. Using tree‐based maximum‐likelihood analysis, we found support for a more recent, secondary introduction of A. porcatus to Florida. Evidence that ~33% of the nuclear DNA resulted from a secondary introduction supports the hybrid origin of the green anole population in South Miami. We used multiple lines of evidence and multiple genetic markers to reconstruct otherwise cryptic patterns of species introduction and hybridization. Genetic evidence for a lack of reproductive isolation, as well as morphological similarities between the two species, supports revising the taxonomy of A. carolinensis to include A. porcatus from western Cuba. Future studies should target the current geographic extent of introgression originating from the past injection of genetic material from Cuban green anoles and determine the consequences for the evolutionary trajectory of green anole populations in southern Florida. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6468060/ /pubmed/31015994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5042 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wegener, Johanna E.
Pita‐Aquino, Jessica N.
Atutubo, Jessica
Moreno, Adam
Kolbe, Jason J.
Hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (Anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (Anolis porcatus)
title Hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (Anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (Anolis porcatus)
title_full Hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (Anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (Anolis porcatus)
title_fullStr Hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (Anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (Anolis porcatus)
title_full_unstemmed Hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (Anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (Anolis porcatus)
title_short Hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (Anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (Anolis porcatus)
title_sort hybridization and rapid differentiation after secondary contact between the native green anole (anolis carolinensis) and the introduced green anole (anolis porcatus)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5042
work_keys_str_mv AT wegenerjohannae hybridizationandrapiddifferentiationaftersecondarycontactbetweenthenativegreenanoleanoliscarolinensisandtheintroducedgreenanoleanolisporcatus
AT pitaaquinojessican hybridizationandrapiddifferentiationaftersecondarycontactbetweenthenativegreenanoleanoliscarolinensisandtheintroducedgreenanoleanolisporcatus
AT atutubojessica hybridizationandrapiddifferentiationaftersecondarycontactbetweenthenativegreenanoleanoliscarolinensisandtheintroducedgreenanoleanolisporcatus
AT morenoadam hybridizationandrapiddifferentiationaftersecondarycontactbetweenthenativegreenanoleanoliscarolinensisandtheintroducedgreenanoleanolisporcatus
AT kolbejasonj hybridizationandrapiddifferentiationaftersecondarycontactbetweenthenativegreenanoleanoliscarolinensisandtheintroducedgreenanoleanolisporcatus