Cargando…
Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems
BACKGROUND: Restoration of the teeth with extensive root canals with different post systems is a challenge for clinicians. Evaluation of these systems is important for clinical success. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated thin-wall...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chang Gung University
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.003 |
_version_ | 1783411377028726784 |
---|---|
author | Öztürk, Caner Polat, Serdar Tunçdemir, Makbule Gönüldaş, Fehmi Şeker, Emre |
author_facet | Öztürk, Caner Polat, Serdar Tunçdemir, Makbule Gönüldaş, Fehmi Şeker, Emre |
author_sort | Öztürk, Caner |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Restoration of the teeth with extensive root canals with different post systems is a challenge for clinicians. Evaluation of these systems is important for clinical success. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth which restored with different post systems. METHODS: Eighty extracted and endodontically treated maxillary canines were divided into 4 groups (n = 20) and the thickness of the radicular dentin walls was reduced by using diamond burs. Each root was embedded in an autopolymerizing resin with a 0.25 mm layer of vinyl polysiloxane material to simulate the periodontal ligament. The subgroups were restored with one of the following post systems: only composite resin (Group 1), cast post (Group 2), glass-fiber post (Group 3), and I-TFC post (Group 4). The samples were subjected to a gradually increasing force (0,5 mm/min). The force required to fracture was recorded, and the data were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey test's and Chi–Square test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The highest fracture resistance was recorded for Group 2, followed by the Group 3, Group 4, and Group 1. Differences in the fracture resistance of teeth were significant among the groups (p < 0.05). The fracture resistance of Group 4 was significantly different than the other tested post systems (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest fracture resistance was recorded for Group 1, but among all post systems, Group 4 had the lowest fracture resistance. The fracture mode of the fiber posts (Radix and I-TFC posts) would permit repair of the tooth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6468162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Chang Gung University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64681622019-04-24 Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems Öztürk, Caner Polat, Serdar Tunçdemir, Makbule Gönüldaş, Fehmi Şeker, Emre Biomed J Original Article BACKGROUND: Restoration of the teeth with extensive root canals with different post systems is a challenge for clinicians. Evaluation of these systems is important for clinical success. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth which restored with different post systems. METHODS: Eighty extracted and endodontically treated maxillary canines were divided into 4 groups (n = 20) and the thickness of the radicular dentin walls was reduced by using diamond burs. Each root was embedded in an autopolymerizing resin with a 0.25 mm layer of vinyl polysiloxane material to simulate the periodontal ligament. The subgroups were restored with one of the following post systems: only composite resin (Group 1), cast post (Group 2), glass-fiber post (Group 3), and I-TFC post (Group 4). The samples were subjected to a gradually increasing force (0,5 mm/min). The force required to fracture was recorded, and the data were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey test's and Chi–Square test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The highest fracture resistance was recorded for Group 2, followed by the Group 3, Group 4, and Group 1. Differences in the fracture resistance of teeth were significant among the groups (p < 0.05). The fracture resistance of Group 4 was significantly different than the other tested post systems (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest fracture resistance was recorded for Group 1, but among all post systems, Group 4 had the lowest fracture resistance. The fracture mode of the fiber posts (Radix and I-TFC posts) would permit repair of the tooth. Chang Gung University 2019-02 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6468162/ /pubmed/30987706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.003 Text en © 2018 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Öztürk, Caner Polat, Serdar Tunçdemir, Makbule Gönüldaş, Fehmi Şeker, Emre Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems |
title | Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems |
title_full | Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems |
title_short | Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems |
title_sort | evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozturkcaner evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems AT polatserdar evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems AT tuncdemirmakbule evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems AT gonuldasfehmi evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems AT sekeremre evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems |