Cargando…

Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems

BACKGROUND: Restoration of the teeth with extensive root canals with different post systems is a challenge for clinicians. Evaluation of these systems is important for clinical success. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated thin-wall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Öztürk, Caner, Polat, Serdar, Tunçdemir, Makbule, Gönüldaş, Fehmi, Şeker, Emre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chang Gung University 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.003
_version_ 1783411377028726784
author Öztürk, Caner
Polat, Serdar
Tunçdemir, Makbule
Gönüldaş, Fehmi
Şeker, Emre
author_facet Öztürk, Caner
Polat, Serdar
Tunçdemir, Makbule
Gönüldaş, Fehmi
Şeker, Emre
author_sort Öztürk, Caner
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Restoration of the teeth with extensive root canals with different post systems is a challenge for clinicians. Evaluation of these systems is important for clinical success. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth which restored with different post systems. METHODS: Eighty extracted and endodontically treated maxillary canines were divided into 4 groups (n = 20) and the thickness of the radicular dentin walls was reduced by using diamond burs. Each root was embedded in an autopolymerizing resin with a 0.25 mm layer of vinyl polysiloxane material to simulate the periodontal ligament. The subgroups were restored with one of the following post systems: only composite resin (Group 1), cast post (Group 2), glass-fiber post (Group 3), and I-TFC post (Group 4). The samples were subjected to a gradually increasing force (0,5 mm/min). The force required to fracture was recorded, and the data were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey test's and Chi–Square test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The highest fracture resistance was recorded for Group 2, followed by the Group 3, Group 4, and Group 1. Differences in the fracture resistance of teeth were significant among the groups (p < 0.05). The fracture resistance of Group 4 was significantly different than the other tested post systems (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest fracture resistance was recorded for Group 1, but among all post systems, Group 4 had the lowest fracture resistance. The fracture mode of the fiber posts (Radix and I-TFC posts) would permit repair of the tooth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6468162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Chang Gung University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64681622019-04-24 Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems Öztürk, Caner Polat, Serdar Tunçdemir, Makbule Gönüldaş, Fehmi Şeker, Emre Biomed J Original Article BACKGROUND: Restoration of the teeth with extensive root canals with different post systems is a challenge for clinicians. Evaluation of these systems is important for clinical success. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth which restored with different post systems. METHODS: Eighty extracted and endodontically treated maxillary canines were divided into 4 groups (n = 20) and the thickness of the radicular dentin walls was reduced by using diamond burs. Each root was embedded in an autopolymerizing resin with a 0.25 mm layer of vinyl polysiloxane material to simulate the periodontal ligament. The subgroups were restored with one of the following post systems: only composite resin (Group 1), cast post (Group 2), glass-fiber post (Group 3), and I-TFC post (Group 4). The samples were subjected to a gradually increasing force (0,5 mm/min). The force required to fracture was recorded, and the data were analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey test's and Chi–Square test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The highest fracture resistance was recorded for Group 2, followed by the Group 3, Group 4, and Group 1. Differences in the fracture resistance of teeth were significant among the groups (p < 0.05). The fracture resistance of Group 4 was significantly different than the other tested post systems (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest fracture resistance was recorded for Group 1, but among all post systems, Group 4 had the lowest fracture resistance. The fracture mode of the fiber posts (Radix and I-TFC posts) would permit repair of the tooth. Chang Gung University 2019-02 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6468162/ /pubmed/30987706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.003 Text en © 2018 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Öztürk, Caner
Polat, Serdar
Tunçdemir, Makbule
Gönüldaş, Fehmi
Şeker, Emre
Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems
title Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems
title_full Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems
title_short Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems
title_sort evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT ozturkcaner evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT polatserdar evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT tuncdemirmakbule evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT gonuldasfehmi evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems
AT sekeremre evaluationofthefractureresistanceofrootfilledthinwalledteethrestoredwithdifferentpostsystems