Cargando…
Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is Fecal Sampling from Multiple Sites Necessary?
Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin (Hb) are increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Most FIT manufacturers instruct that fecal samples from multiple parts of one bowel movement should be obtained. Our aim was to compare the FIT diagnostic performance based on fecal sam...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30901946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11030400 |
_version_ | 1783411432103084032 |
---|---|
author | Amitay, Efrat L. Gies, Anton Weigl, Korbinian Brenner, Hermann |
author_facet | Amitay, Efrat L. Gies, Anton Weigl, Korbinian Brenner, Hermann |
author_sort | Amitay, Efrat L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin (Hb) are increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Most FIT manufacturers instruct that fecal samples from multiple parts of one bowel movement should be obtained. Our aim was to compare the FIT diagnostic performance based on fecal samples from just one versus two different sites of one bowel movement. A total of 1141 participants of screening colonoscopy provided two fecal samples from two different sites of a single bowel movement for FIT analyses. There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic performance of the FIT when either one or both fecal samples were used for analysis, with area under the curve (AUC) for detecting CRC ranging from 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84–0.99) for one FIT to 0.95 (95%CI 0.86–0.99) for a geometric mean of two FITs. The manufacturers’ recommendation of sampling multiple sites of the stool aims to reduce intra-individual Hb variability and improve diagnostic performance. If no such improvement can be achieved, the recommendation for multiple-site sampling might have potential adverse effects on population adherence to FIT-based CRC screening. Our results point to a potential of increasing adherence to FIT screening by simplifying instructions for fecal sampling at no loss of the diagnostic performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6468428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64684282019-04-24 Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is Fecal Sampling from Multiple Sites Necessary? Amitay, Efrat L. Gies, Anton Weigl, Korbinian Brenner, Hermann Cancers (Basel) Article Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin (Hb) are increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Most FIT manufacturers instruct that fecal samples from multiple parts of one bowel movement should be obtained. Our aim was to compare the FIT diagnostic performance based on fecal samples from just one versus two different sites of one bowel movement. A total of 1141 participants of screening colonoscopy provided two fecal samples from two different sites of a single bowel movement for FIT analyses. There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnostic performance of the FIT when either one or both fecal samples were used for analysis, with area under the curve (AUC) for detecting CRC ranging from 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84–0.99) for one FIT to 0.95 (95%CI 0.86–0.99) for a geometric mean of two FITs. The manufacturers’ recommendation of sampling multiple sites of the stool aims to reduce intra-individual Hb variability and improve diagnostic performance. If no such improvement can be achieved, the recommendation for multiple-site sampling might have potential adverse effects on population adherence to FIT-based CRC screening. Our results point to a potential of increasing adherence to FIT screening by simplifying instructions for fecal sampling at no loss of the diagnostic performance. MDPI 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6468428/ /pubmed/30901946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11030400 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Amitay, Efrat L. Gies, Anton Weigl, Korbinian Brenner, Hermann Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is Fecal Sampling from Multiple Sites Necessary? |
title | Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is Fecal Sampling from Multiple Sites Necessary? |
title_full | Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is Fecal Sampling from Multiple Sites Necessary? |
title_fullStr | Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is Fecal Sampling from Multiple Sites Necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed | Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is Fecal Sampling from Multiple Sites Necessary? |
title_short | Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is Fecal Sampling from Multiple Sites Necessary? |
title_sort | fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening: is fecal sampling from multiple sites necessary? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30901946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11030400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amitayefratl fecalimmunochemicaltestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningisfecalsamplingfrommultiplesitesnecessary AT giesanton fecalimmunochemicaltestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningisfecalsamplingfrommultiplesitesnecessary AT weiglkorbinian fecalimmunochemicaltestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningisfecalsamplingfrommultiplesitesnecessary AT brennerhermann fecalimmunochemicaltestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningisfecalsamplingfrommultiplesitesnecessary |