Urinary catheters in the emergency department: a prospective audit to improve quality control

INTRODUCTION: The best way to prevent urinary catheter related complications is to avoid unnecessary insertions of catheters and removing the catheters when they are no longer necessary. Previous studies have shown 47% documentation rate of urinary catheter (UC) insertion in the Emergency Department (ED) and have found one-sixth of patients in the ED have no indication for UC insertion. The aim of this audit was to record the indications and documentation of UC insertion in the ED and to propose an intervention to improve the quality of these processes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective audit was conducted in a tertiary university teaching hospital in Ireland over an eight-week period. A week-long intervention was conducted in the ED to educate staff, an ED doctor was involved in directly communicating this to the staff thereafter and concise labels were introduced to document relevant details about each UC insertion. The pre-intervention and post-intervention data was compared using Chi-Square tests. RESULTS: A total of 103 (50 pre-intervention and 53 post-intervention) consecutive age and gender matched patients were recruited in the audit over 8 weeks. The documentation for UC insertion improved by 22% (8% to 30%, (p <0.001, chi-square) while the non-indication for UC insertion reduced by 6% (36% to 30%, p = 0.53, chi-square). CONCLUSIONS: A simple intervention achieved significantly improved documentation of UC insertion and a trend toward increased appropriateness of UC insertion. This audit serves as an example to improve quality control around UC insertion which could be adopted in other institutions.