Cargando…
Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Phase I trials aim to identify the recommended dose for further development. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) could be a complement to the usual National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) scale to detect adverse events and define the doses....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30991990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5579-3 |
_version_ | 1783411567414476800 |
---|---|
author | Fiteni, Frédéric Ray, Isabelle Le Ousmen, Ahmad Isambert, Nicolas Anota, Amélie Bonnetain, Franck |
author_facet | Fiteni, Frédéric Ray, Isabelle Le Ousmen, Ahmad Isambert, Nicolas Anota, Amélie Bonnetain, Franck |
author_sort | Fiteni, Frédéric |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Phase I trials aim to identify the recommended dose for further development. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) could be a complement to the usual National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) scale to detect adverse events and define the doses. The objective of this study is to review the phase I in oncology which used HRQoL as endpoint. METHODS: A search in PubMed database identified phase I trials in oncology with HRQoL as endpoint, published between January 2012 to May 2016. Hematological and pediatric phase I were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 1333 phase I were identified and 15 trials were identified with HRQoL as endpoint (1.1%). The European Organisation for Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was the most frequently used instrument: 5 studies (33.3%). The targeted dimensions of HRQoL and the minimal clinically important difference were prespecified in 1 study (6.7%) and 2 studies (13.3%), respectively. Twelve studies (80%) described the statistical approach to analyze HRQoL data. Eight studies used the mean change from baseline (60%) to analyse longitudinal HRQoL data, two the mean score at certain times (13.3%), one the linear mixed model for repeated measures (6.7%), one the time to HRQoL score deterioration (6.7%), one percentage of patient-reported symptoms (6.7%). None of the studies used HRQoL to determine the recommended doses. CONCLUSION: Few phase I studies used HRQoL as endpoint and among studies with HRQoL as endpoint, the methodology of HRQoL measurement and statistical analysis was heterogeneous. HRQoL. endpoint not used for assessing the recommended phase II doses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6469065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64690652019-04-23 Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review Fiteni, Frédéric Ray, Isabelle Le Ousmen, Ahmad Isambert, Nicolas Anota, Amélie Bonnetain, Franck BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Phase I trials aim to identify the recommended dose for further development. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) could be a complement to the usual National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) scale to detect adverse events and define the doses. The objective of this study is to review the phase I in oncology which used HRQoL as endpoint. METHODS: A search in PubMed database identified phase I trials in oncology with HRQoL as endpoint, published between January 2012 to May 2016. Hematological and pediatric phase I were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 1333 phase I were identified and 15 trials were identified with HRQoL as endpoint (1.1%). The European Organisation for Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was the most frequently used instrument: 5 studies (33.3%). The targeted dimensions of HRQoL and the minimal clinically important difference were prespecified in 1 study (6.7%) and 2 studies (13.3%), respectively. Twelve studies (80%) described the statistical approach to analyze HRQoL data. Eight studies used the mean change from baseline (60%) to analyse longitudinal HRQoL data, two the mean score at certain times (13.3%), one the linear mixed model for repeated measures (6.7%), one the time to HRQoL score deterioration (6.7%), one percentage of patient-reported symptoms (6.7%). None of the studies used HRQoL to determine the recommended doses. CONCLUSION: Few phase I studies used HRQoL as endpoint and among studies with HRQoL as endpoint, the methodology of HRQoL measurement and statistical analysis was heterogeneous. HRQoL. endpoint not used for assessing the recommended phase II doses. BioMed Central 2019-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6469065/ /pubmed/30991990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5579-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fiteni, Frédéric Ray, Isabelle Le Ousmen, Ahmad Isambert, Nicolas Anota, Amélie Bonnetain, Franck Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review |
title | Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review |
title_full | Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review |
title_short | Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review |
title_sort | health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase i trials: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30991990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5579-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitenifrederic healthrelatedqualityoflifeasanendpointinoncologyphaseitrialsasystematicreview AT rayisabellele healthrelatedqualityoflifeasanendpointinoncologyphaseitrialsasystematicreview AT ousmenahmad healthrelatedqualityoflifeasanendpointinoncologyphaseitrialsasystematicreview AT isambertnicolas healthrelatedqualityoflifeasanendpointinoncologyphaseitrialsasystematicreview AT anotaamelie healthrelatedqualityoflifeasanendpointinoncologyphaseitrialsasystematicreview AT bonnetainfranck healthrelatedqualityoflifeasanendpointinoncologyphaseitrialsasystematicreview |