Cargando…

Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs

BACKGROUND: Restrictions on respiratory trainee time and access to procedures reduce the opportunities to acquire necessary skills in bronchoscopy. Simulation, not subject to such impediments, is a useful supplementary aid to teaching bronchoscopic techniques in a safe environment but there is a lim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garner, Justin L., Garner, Stefan D., Hardie, Robin J., Molyneaux, Philip L., Singh, Suveer, Kemp, Samuel V., Shah, Pallav L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00035-2019
_version_ 1783411568564764672
author Garner, Justin L.
Garner, Stefan D.
Hardie, Robin J.
Molyneaux, Philip L.
Singh, Suveer
Kemp, Samuel V.
Shah, Pallav L.
author_facet Garner, Justin L.
Garner, Stefan D.
Hardie, Robin J.
Molyneaux, Philip L.
Singh, Suveer
Kemp, Samuel V.
Shah, Pallav L.
author_sort Garner, Justin L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Restrictions on respiratory trainee time and access to procedures reduce the opportunities to acquire necessary skills in bronchoscopy. Simulation, not subject to such impediments, is a useful supplementary aid to teaching bronchoscopic techniques in a safe environment but there is a limited choice of simulators that are sufficiently realistic and not prohibitively expensive. This study evaluated a low-cost device that simulates an intubated and ventilated patient, employing re-useable, inflatable, BioFlex-preserved, porcine lungs. METHODS: 26 bronchoscopists, trainee and experienced, after using the bronchoscopy biosimulator, completed a questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale comparing its performance with that of the computerised CAE AccuTouch. RESULTS: Participants were largely positive about their experience (mean score of 4.76). The bronchoscopy biosimulator was found to be realistic (mean score 4.64), easy to use (mean score 4.88), and helpful in learning to perform a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (mean score 4.85). Importantly, the bronchoscopy biosimulator compared favourably to the computer simulator (mean score 4.84). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the concept of the bronchoscopy biosimulator as an acceptable model with which to supplement the experience of bronchoscopic procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6469070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64690702019-04-22 Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs Garner, Justin L. Garner, Stefan D. Hardie, Robin J. Molyneaux, Philip L. Singh, Suveer Kemp, Samuel V. Shah, Pallav L. ERJ Open Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Restrictions on respiratory trainee time and access to procedures reduce the opportunities to acquire necessary skills in bronchoscopy. Simulation, not subject to such impediments, is a useful supplementary aid to teaching bronchoscopic techniques in a safe environment but there is a limited choice of simulators that are sufficiently realistic and not prohibitively expensive. This study evaluated a low-cost device that simulates an intubated and ventilated patient, employing re-useable, inflatable, BioFlex-preserved, porcine lungs. METHODS: 26 bronchoscopists, trainee and experienced, after using the bronchoscopy biosimulator, completed a questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale comparing its performance with that of the computerised CAE AccuTouch. RESULTS: Participants were largely positive about their experience (mean score of 4.76). The bronchoscopy biosimulator was found to be realistic (mean score 4.64), easy to use (mean score 4.88), and helpful in learning to perform a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (mean score 4.85). Importantly, the bronchoscopy biosimulator compared favourably to the computer simulator (mean score 4.84). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the concept of the bronchoscopy biosimulator as an acceptable model with which to supplement the experience of bronchoscopic procedures. European Respiratory Society 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6469070/ /pubmed/31011572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00035-2019 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Garner, Justin L.
Garner, Stefan D.
Hardie, Robin J.
Molyneaux, Philip L.
Singh, Suveer
Kemp, Samuel V.
Shah, Pallav L.
Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs
title Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs
title_full Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs
title_fullStr Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs
title_short Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs
title_sort evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00035-2019
work_keys_str_mv AT garnerjustinl evaluationofareuseablebronchoscopybiosimulatorwithventilatedlungs
AT garnerstefand evaluationofareuseablebronchoscopybiosimulatorwithventilatedlungs
AT hardierobinj evaluationofareuseablebronchoscopybiosimulatorwithventilatedlungs
AT molyneauxphilipl evaluationofareuseablebronchoscopybiosimulatorwithventilatedlungs
AT singhsuveer evaluationofareuseablebronchoscopybiosimulatorwithventilatedlungs
AT kempsamuelv evaluationofareuseablebronchoscopybiosimulatorwithventilatedlungs
AT shahpallavl evaluationofareuseablebronchoscopybiosimulatorwithventilatedlungs