Cargando…

Changes in treatment status of patients with severe mental illness in rural China, 1994–2015

BACKGROUND: Although it is crucial to improve the treatment status of people with severe mental illness (SMI), it is still unknown whether and how socioeconomic development influences their treatment status. AIMS: To explore the change in treatment status in people with SMI from 1994 to 2015 in rura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ran, Mao-Sheng, Weng, Xue, Liu, Yu-Jun, Zhang, Tian-Ming, Yu, Yue-Hui, Peng, Man-Man, Luo, Wei, Hu, Shi-Hui, Yang, Xin, Liu, Bo, Zhang, Tin, Thornicroft, Graham, Chan, Cecilia Lai-Wan, Xiang, Meng-Ze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31068242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.13
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Although it is crucial to improve the treatment status of people with severe mental illness (SMI), it is still unknown whether and how socioeconomic development influences their treatment status. AIMS: To explore the change in treatment status in people with SMI from 1994 to 2015 in rural China and to examine the factors influencing treatment status in those with SMI. METHOD: Two mental health surveys using identical methods and ICD-10 were conducted in 1994 and 2015 (population ≥15 years old, n = 152 776) in the same six townships of Xinjin County, Chengdu, China. RESULTS: Compared with 1994, individuals with SMI in 2015 had significantly higher rates of poor family economic status, fewer family caregivers, longer duration of illness, later age at first onset and poor mental status. Participants in 2015 had significantly higher rates of never being treated, taking antipsychotic drugs and ever being admitted to hospital, and lower rates of using traditional Chinese medicine or being treated by traditional/spiritual healers. The factors strongly associated with never being treated included worse mental status (symptoms/social functioning), older age, having no family caregivers and poor family economic status. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic development influences the treatment status of people with SMI in contemporary rural China. Relative poverty, having no family caregivers and older age are important factors associated with a worse treatment status. Culture-specific, community-based interventions and targeted poverty-alleviation programmes should be developed to improve the early identification, treatment and recovery of individuals with SMI in rural China. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.