Cargando…

Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England began offering biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) at ages 60–69 years. Although FOBt is aimed at detecting colorectal neoplasms, other conditions can affect the result. In a large UK prospective study, we examined a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Emily, Alison, Rupert, Blanks, Roger, Pirie, Kirstin, Reeves, Gillian, Ward, Robyn L, Steele, Robert, Patnick, Julietta, Canfell, Karen, Beral, Valerie, Green, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30668711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy271
_version_ 1783411619862151168
author He, Emily
Alison, Rupert
Blanks, Roger
Pirie, Kirstin
Reeves, Gillian
Ward, Robyn L
Steele, Robert
Patnick, Julietta
Canfell, Karen
Beral, Valerie
Green, Jane
author_facet He, Emily
Alison, Rupert
Blanks, Roger
Pirie, Kirstin
Reeves, Gillian
Ward, Robyn L
Steele, Robert
Patnick, Julietta
Canfell, Karen
Beral, Valerie
Green, Jane
author_sort He, Emily
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England began offering biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) at ages 60–69 years. Although FOBt is aimed at detecting colorectal neoplasms, other conditions can affect the result. In a large UK prospective study, we examined associations, both before and after screening, between FOBt positivity and 10 conditions that are often associated with gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: By electronically linking BCSP and Million Women Study records, we identified 604 495 women without previous colorectal cancer who participated in their first routine FOBt screening between 2006 and 2012. Regression models, using linked national hospital admission records, yielded adjusted relative risks (RRs) in FOBt-positive versus FOBt-negative women for colorectal cancer, adenoma, diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, haemorrhoids, upper gastrointestinal cancer, oesophagitis, peptic ulcer, anaemia and other haematological disorders. RESULTS: RRs in FOBt-positive versus FOBt-negative women were 201.3 (95% CI 173.8–233.2) for colorectal cancer and 197.9 (95% CI 180.6–216.8) for adenoma within 12 months after screening and 3.49 (95% CI 2.31–5.26) and 4.88 (95% CI 3.80–6.26), respectively, 12–24 months after screening; P < 0.001 for all RRs. In the 12 months after screening, the RR for inflammatory bowel disease was 26.3 (95% CI 19.9–34.7), and ranged between 2 and 5 for the upper gastrointestinal or haematological disorders. The RRs of being diagnosed with any of the eight conditions other than colorectal neoplasms before screening, and in the 12–24 months after screening, were 1.81 (95% CI 1.81–2.01) and 1.92 (95% CI 1.66–2.13), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas FOBt positivity is associated with a substantially increased risk of colorectal neoplasms after screening, eight other gastrointestinal and haematological conditions are also associated with FOBt positivity, both before and after screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6469304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64693042019-04-22 Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England He, Emily Alison, Rupert Blanks, Roger Pirie, Kirstin Reeves, Gillian Ward, Robyn L Steele, Robert Patnick, Julietta Canfell, Karen Beral, Valerie Green, Jane Int J Epidemiol Screening BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England began offering biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) at ages 60–69 years. Although FOBt is aimed at detecting colorectal neoplasms, other conditions can affect the result. In a large UK prospective study, we examined associations, both before and after screening, between FOBt positivity and 10 conditions that are often associated with gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: By electronically linking BCSP and Million Women Study records, we identified 604 495 women without previous colorectal cancer who participated in their first routine FOBt screening between 2006 and 2012. Regression models, using linked national hospital admission records, yielded adjusted relative risks (RRs) in FOBt-positive versus FOBt-negative women for colorectal cancer, adenoma, diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, haemorrhoids, upper gastrointestinal cancer, oesophagitis, peptic ulcer, anaemia and other haematological disorders. RESULTS: RRs in FOBt-positive versus FOBt-negative women were 201.3 (95% CI 173.8–233.2) for colorectal cancer and 197.9 (95% CI 180.6–216.8) for adenoma within 12 months after screening and 3.49 (95% CI 2.31–5.26) and 4.88 (95% CI 3.80–6.26), respectively, 12–24 months after screening; P < 0.001 for all RRs. In the 12 months after screening, the RR for inflammatory bowel disease was 26.3 (95% CI 19.9–34.7), and ranged between 2 and 5 for the upper gastrointestinal or haematological disorders. The RRs of being diagnosed with any of the eight conditions other than colorectal neoplasms before screening, and in the 12–24 months after screening, were 1.81 (95% CI 1.81–2.01) and 1.92 (95% CI 1.66–2.13), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas FOBt positivity is associated with a substantially increased risk of colorectal neoplasms after screening, eight other gastrointestinal and haematological conditions are also associated with FOBt positivity, both before and after screening. Oxford University Press 2019-04 2019-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6469304/ /pubmed/30668711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy271 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Screening
He, Emily
Alison, Rupert
Blanks, Roger
Pirie, Kirstin
Reeves, Gillian
Ward, Robyn L
Steele, Robert
Patnick, Julietta
Canfell, Karen
Beral, Valerie
Green, Jane
Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England
title Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England
title_full Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England
title_fullStr Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England
title_full_unstemmed Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England
title_short Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England
title_sort association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in england
topic Screening
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30668711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy271
work_keys_str_mv AT heemily associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT alisonrupert associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT blanksroger associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT piriekirstin associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT reevesgillian associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT wardrobynl associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT steelerobert associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT patnickjulietta associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT canfellkaren associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT beralvalerie associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland
AT greenjane associationoftengastrointestinalandothermedicalconditionswithpositivitytofaecaloccultbloodtestinginroutinescreeningalargeprospectivestudyofwomeninengland