Cargando…

Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model

Experimental populations of model organisms provide valuable opportunities to unravel the genomic impact of selection in a controlled system. The Virginia body weight chicken lines represent a unique resource to investigate signatures of selection in a system where long-term, single-trait, bidirecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lillie, Mette, Honaker, Christa F., Siegel, Paul B., Carlborg, Örjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400038
_version_ 1783411635435601920
author Lillie, Mette
Honaker, Christa F.
Siegel, Paul B.
Carlborg, Örjan
author_facet Lillie, Mette
Honaker, Christa F.
Siegel, Paul B.
Carlborg, Örjan
author_sort Lillie, Mette
collection PubMed
description Experimental populations of model organisms provide valuable opportunities to unravel the genomic impact of selection in a controlled system. The Virginia body weight chicken lines represent a unique resource to investigate signatures of selection in a system where long-term, single-trait, bidirectional selection has been carried out for more than 60 generations. At 55 generations of divergent selection, earlier analyses of pooled genome resequencing data from these lines revealed that 14.2% of the genome showed extreme differentiation between the selected lines, contained within 395 genomic regions. Here, we report more detailed analyses of these data exploring the regions displaying within- and between-line genomic signatures of the bidirectional selection applied in these lines. Despite the strict selection regime for opposite extremes in body weight, this did not result in opposite genomic signatures between the lines. The lines often displayed a duality of the sweep signatures, where an extended region of homozygosity in one line, in contrast to mosaic pattern of heterozygosity in the other line. These haplotype mosaics consisted of short, distinct haploblocks of variable between-line divergence, likely the results of a complex demographic history involving bottlenecks, introgressions and moderate inbreeding. We demonstrate this using the example of complex haplotype mosaicism in the growth1 QTL. These mosaics represent the standing genetic variation available at the onset of selection in the founder population. Selection on standing genetic variation can thus result in different signatures depending on the intensity and direction of selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6469407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64694072019-04-23 Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model Lillie, Mette Honaker, Christa F. Siegel, Paul B. Carlborg, Örjan G3 (Bethesda) Investigations Experimental populations of model organisms provide valuable opportunities to unravel the genomic impact of selection in a controlled system. The Virginia body weight chicken lines represent a unique resource to investigate signatures of selection in a system where long-term, single-trait, bidirectional selection has been carried out for more than 60 generations. At 55 generations of divergent selection, earlier analyses of pooled genome resequencing data from these lines revealed that 14.2% of the genome showed extreme differentiation between the selected lines, contained within 395 genomic regions. Here, we report more detailed analyses of these data exploring the regions displaying within- and between-line genomic signatures of the bidirectional selection applied in these lines. Despite the strict selection regime for opposite extremes in body weight, this did not result in opposite genomic signatures between the lines. The lines often displayed a duality of the sweep signatures, where an extended region of homozygosity in one line, in contrast to mosaic pattern of heterozygosity in the other line. These haplotype mosaics consisted of short, distinct haploblocks of variable between-line divergence, likely the results of a complex demographic history involving bottlenecks, introgressions and moderate inbreeding. We demonstrate this using the example of complex haplotype mosaicism in the growth1 QTL. These mosaics represent the standing genetic variation available at the onset of selection in the founder population. Selection on standing genetic variation can thus result in different signatures depending on the intensity and direction of selection. Genetics Society of America 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6469407/ /pubmed/30737239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400038 Text en Copyright © 2019 Lillie et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigations
Lillie, Mette
Honaker, Christa F.
Siegel, Paul B.
Carlborg, Örjan
Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model
title Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model
title_full Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model
title_fullStr Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model
title_full_unstemmed Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model
title_short Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model
title_sort bidirectional selection for body weight on standing genetic variation in a chicken model
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400038
work_keys_str_mv AT lilliemette bidirectionalselectionforbodyweightonstandinggeneticvariationinachickenmodel
AT honakerchristaf bidirectionalselectionforbodyweightonstandinggeneticvariationinachickenmodel
AT siegelpaulb bidirectionalselectionforbodyweightonstandinggeneticvariationinachickenmodel
AT carlborgorjan bidirectionalselectionforbodyweightonstandinggeneticvariationinachickenmodel