Cargando…
Differences in Tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by WHO standards vs. within-population references
Anthropometric measures are commonly converted to age stratified z-scores to examine variation in growth outcomes in mixed-age and sex samples. For many study populations, z-scores will differ if calculated from World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards or within-population references. The sp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30995260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214965 |
_version_ | 1783411676372008960 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Melanie Blackwell, Aaron Kaplan, Hillard Gurven, Michael |
author_facet | Martin, Melanie Blackwell, Aaron Kaplan, Hillard Gurven, Michael |
author_sort | Martin, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anthropometric measures are commonly converted to age stratified z-scores to examine variation in growth outcomes in mixed-age and sex samples. For many study populations, z-scores will differ if calculated from World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards or within-population references. The specific growth reference used may influence statistical estimates of growth outcomes and their determinants, with implications for biological inference. We examined factors associated with growth outcomes in a sample of 152 Tsimane children aged 0–36 months. The Tsimane are a subsistence-scale population in the Bolivian Amazon with high rates of infectious disease and growth faltering. To examine the influence of growth reference on statistical inferences, we constructed multiple plausible models from available infant, maternal, and household attributes. We then ran identical models for height-for-age (HAZ), weight-for-age (WAZ), and weight-for-height (WHZ), with z-scores alternately calculated from WHO and robust Tsimane Lambda-Mu-Sigma growth curves. The distribution of WHO relative to Tsimane HAZ scores was negatively skewed, reflecting age-related increases in lower HAZ. Standardized coefficients and significance levels generally agreed across WHO and Tsimane models, although the strength and significance of specific terms varied in some models. Age was strongly, negatively associated with HAZ and WAZ in nearly all WHO, but not Tsimane models, resulting in consistently higher R(2) estimates. Age and weaning effects were confounded in WHO models. Biased estimates of determinants associated with WHO HAZ may be more extreme in small samples and for variables that are strongly age-patterned. Additional methodological considerations may be warranted when applying WHO standards to within-population studies, particularly for populations with growth patterns known to systematically deviate from those of the WHO reference sample. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6469771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64697712019-05-03 Differences in Tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by WHO standards vs. within-population references Martin, Melanie Blackwell, Aaron Kaplan, Hillard Gurven, Michael PLoS One Research Article Anthropometric measures are commonly converted to age stratified z-scores to examine variation in growth outcomes in mixed-age and sex samples. For many study populations, z-scores will differ if calculated from World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards or within-population references. The specific growth reference used may influence statistical estimates of growth outcomes and their determinants, with implications for biological inference. We examined factors associated with growth outcomes in a sample of 152 Tsimane children aged 0–36 months. The Tsimane are a subsistence-scale population in the Bolivian Amazon with high rates of infectious disease and growth faltering. To examine the influence of growth reference on statistical inferences, we constructed multiple plausible models from available infant, maternal, and household attributes. We then ran identical models for height-for-age (HAZ), weight-for-age (WAZ), and weight-for-height (WHZ), with z-scores alternately calculated from WHO and robust Tsimane Lambda-Mu-Sigma growth curves. The distribution of WHO relative to Tsimane HAZ scores was negatively skewed, reflecting age-related increases in lower HAZ. Standardized coefficients and significance levels generally agreed across WHO and Tsimane models, although the strength and significance of specific terms varied in some models. Age was strongly, negatively associated with HAZ and WAZ in nearly all WHO, but not Tsimane models, resulting in consistently higher R(2) estimates. Age and weaning effects were confounded in WHO models. Biased estimates of determinants associated with WHO HAZ may be more extreme in small samples and for variables that are strongly age-patterned. Additional methodological considerations may be warranted when applying WHO standards to within-population studies, particularly for populations with growth patterns known to systematically deviate from those of the WHO reference sample. Public Library of Science 2019-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6469771/ /pubmed/30995260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214965 Text en © 2019 Martin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Martin, Melanie Blackwell, Aaron Kaplan, Hillard Gurven, Michael Differences in Tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by WHO standards vs. within-population references |
title | Differences in Tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by WHO standards vs. within-population references |
title_full | Differences in Tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by WHO standards vs. within-population references |
title_fullStr | Differences in Tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by WHO standards vs. within-population references |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by WHO standards vs. within-population references |
title_short | Differences in Tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by WHO standards vs. within-population references |
title_sort | differences in tsimane children’s growth outcomes and associated determinants as estimated by who standards vs. within-population references |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30995260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214965 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinmelanie differencesintsimanechildrensgrowthoutcomesandassociateddeterminantsasestimatedbywhostandardsvswithinpopulationreferences AT blackwellaaron differencesintsimanechildrensgrowthoutcomesandassociateddeterminantsasestimatedbywhostandardsvswithinpopulationreferences AT kaplanhillard differencesintsimanechildrensgrowthoutcomesandassociateddeterminantsasestimatedbywhostandardsvswithinpopulationreferences AT gurvenmichael differencesintsimanechildrensgrowthoutcomesandassociateddeterminantsasestimatedbywhostandardsvswithinpopulationreferences |