Cargando…

Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesised that the use of a polyaxial locking plate design offers the same clinical benefits as a monoaxial locking plate system following distal femoral osteoporotic/periprosthetic fracture fixation. METHOD: A multicentre prospective randomised pilot trial was conducted. Inclusi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanakaris, Nikolaos K., Obakponovwe, Oghofori, Krkovic, Matija, Costa, Matt L., Shaw, David, Mohanty, Khitish R., West, Robert M., Giannoudis, Peter V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30069590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4061-1
_version_ 1783411728660299776
author Kanakaris, Nikolaos K.
Obakponovwe, Oghofori
Krkovic, Matija
Costa, Matt L.
Shaw, David
Mohanty, Khitish R.
West, Robert M.
Giannoudis, Peter V.
author_facet Kanakaris, Nikolaos K.
Obakponovwe, Oghofori
Krkovic, Matija
Costa, Matt L.
Shaw, David
Mohanty, Khitish R.
West, Robert M.
Giannoudis, Peter V.
author_sort Kanakaris, Nikolaos K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We hypothesised that the use of a polyaxial locking plate design offers the same clinical benefits as a monoaxial locking plate system following distal femoral osteoporotic/periprosthetic fracture fixation. METHOD: A multicentre prospective randomised pilot trial was conducted. Inclusion criteria were patients over 60 years with a displaced osteoporotic or periprosthetic distal femoral fracture. Details documented included time to union, complications, reinterventions and functional outcomes according to the Oxford knee score and EuroQol EQ-5D. Analysis of factors influencing an early fracture healing response was performed between those with clear features of radiological callus formation at three months. Statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model with multiple covariates assessed for each plate system (1:1 ratio) over a follow-up period of one year. RESULTS: Forty patients (34 females) with a mean age of 77 (60–99) were recruited. Four patients deceased within the first six months. Twenty-five patients united by the six month follow-up. Six more patients progressed to union between six and nine months. Five patients developed non-union (two patients had implant failure; one in each group) and all underwent revision surgery. Malunion was evident in two cases, one with 15° of valgus (monoaxial plate), and one with 12° of recurvatum (polyaxial plate). Between the two plate systems, statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in most of the recorded parameters. Radiological features of early bone healing were present when the surgical approach was smaller (p = 0.015), and when a greater working length of the bridging plate was present (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Both plate systems demonstrated good union rates and limited implant related complications. Good reduction, mechanically sound construct and respect of the local fracture biology was more important than the particular plate design characteristics. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00264-018-4061-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6470115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64701152019-05-03 Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial Kanakaris, Nikolaos K. Obakponovwe, Oghofori Krkovic, Matija Costa, Matt L. Shaw, David Mohanty, Khitish R. West, Robert M. Giannoudis, Peter V. Int Orthop Original Paper INTRODUCTION: We hypothesised that the use of a polyaxial locking plate design offers the same clinical benefits as a monoaxial locking plate system following distal femoral osteoporotic/periprosthetic fracture fixation. METHOD: A multicentre prospective randomised pilot trial was conducted. Inclusion criteria were patients over 60 years with a displaced osteoporotic or periprosthetic distal femoral fracture. Details documented included time to union, complications, reinterventions and functional outcomes according to the Oxford knee score and EuroQol EQ-5D. Analysis of factors influencing an early fracture healing response was performed between those with clear features of radiological callus formation at three months. Statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model with multiple covariates assessed for each plate system (1:1 ratio) over a follow-up period of one year. RESULTS: Forty patients (34 females) with a mean age of 77 (60–99) were recruited. Four patients deceased within the first six months. Twenty-five patients united by the six month follow-up. Six more patients progressed to union between six and nine months. Five patients developed non-union (two patients had implant failure; one in each group) and all underwent revision surgery. Malunion was evident in two cases, one with 15° of valgus (monoaxial plate), and one with 12° of recurvatum (polyaxial plate). Between the two plate systems, statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in most of the recorded parameters. Radiological features of early bone healing were present when the surgical approach was smaller (p = 0.015), and when a greater working length of the bridging plate was present (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Both plate systems demonstrated good union rates and limited implant related complications. Good reduction, mechanically sound construct and respect of the local fracture biology was more important than the particular plate design characteristics. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00264-018-4061-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-25 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6470115/ /pubmed/30069590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4061-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kanakaris, Nikolaos K.
Obakponovwe, Oghofori
Krkovic, Matija
Costa, Matt L.
Shaw, David
Mohanty, Khitish R.
West, Robert M.
Giannoudis, Peter V.
Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short Fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort fixation of periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures with locking plates: a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30069590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4061-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kanakarisnikolaosk fixationofperiprostheticorosteoporoticdistalfemoralfractureswithlockingplatesapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT obakponovweoghofori fixationofperiprostheticorosteoporoticdistalfemoralfractureswithlockingplatesapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT krkovicmatija fixationofperiprostheticorosteoporoticdistalfemoralfractureswithlockingplatesapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT costamattl fixationofperiprostheticorosteoporoticdistalfemoralfractureswithlockingplatesapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shawdavid fixationofperiprostheticorosteoporoticdistalfemoralfractureswithlockingplatesapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mohantykhitishr fixationofperiprostheticorosteoporoticdistalfemoralfractureswithlockingplatesapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT westrobertm fixationofperiprostheticorosteoporoticdistalfemoralfractureswithlockingplatesapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT giannoudispeterv fixationofperiprostheticorosteoporoticdistalfemoralfractureswithlockingplatesapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial