Cargando…
Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Background: Noninvasive blood and urine markers have been widely explored in recent decades for diagnosing acute rejection after liver tra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00758 |
_version_ | 1783411747824074752 |
---|---|
author | Krenzien, Felix Keshi, Eriselda Splith, Katrin Griesel, Silvan Kamali, Kaan Sauer, Igor M. Feldbrügge, Linda Pratschke, Johann Leder, Annekatrin Schmelzle, Moritz |
author_facet | Krenzien, Felix Keshi, Eriselda Splith, Katrin Griesel, Silvan Kamali, Kaan Sauer, Igor M. Feldbrügge, Linda Pratschke, Johann Leder, Annekatrin Schmelzle, Moritz |
author_sort | Krenzien, Felix |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Background: Noninvasive blood and urine markers have been widely explored in recent decades for diagnosing acute rejection after liver transplantation. However, none have been translated into routine clinical use so far due to uncertain diagnostic accuracy, and liver biopsy remains the gold standard. Methods: Systematic literature searches of Medline, Cochrane and Embase were conducted up to February 2019 to identify studies evaluating the use of noninvasive markers in diagnosing allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with DerSimonian–Laird weighting and the hierarchical summary receiver operating curve. Results: Of 560 identified studies, 15 studies (1,445 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The following markers were tested: acid labile nitroso-compounds (NOx), serum amyloid A protein, procalcitonin, peripheral blood eosinophil count, peripheral blood T-cell activation and interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor, guanylate-binding protein-2 mRNA, graft-derived cell-free DNA, pi-glutathione S-transferase, alpha-glutathione S-transferase and serum HLA class I soluble antigens. Only eosinophil count was tested in multiple studies, and they demonstrated high heterogeneity (I(2) = 72% [95% CI: 0.5–0.99]). IL-2 receptor demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89% [95% CI: 0.78–0.96]) and specificity (81% [95% CI: 0.69–0.89]). Conclusion: IL-2 receptor expression demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, while the peripheral eosinophil count was the only marker tested in more than one study. Presently, liver biopsy remains superior to noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers as most studies exhibited inferior designs, hindering possible translation into clinical application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6470197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64701972019-04-26 Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Krenzien, Felix Keshi, Eriselda Splith, Katrin Griesel, Silvan Kamali, Kaan Sauer, Igor M. Feldbrügge, Linda Pratschke, Johann Leder, Annekatrin Schmelzle, Moritz Front Immunol Immunology Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Background: Noninvasive blood and urine markers have been widely explored in recent decades for diagnosing acute rejection after liver transplantation. However, none have been translated into routine clinical use so far due to uncertain diagnostic accuracy, and liver biopsy remains the gold standard. Methods: Systematic literature searches of Medline, Cochrane and Embase were conducted up to February 2019 to identify studies evaluating the use of noninvasive markers in diagnosing allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with DerSimonian–Laird weighting and the hierarchical summary receiver operating curve. Results: Of 560 identified studies, 15 studies (1,445 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The following markers were tested: acid labile nitroso-compounds (NOx), serum amyloid A protein, procalcitonin, peripheral blood eosinophil count, peripheral blood T-cell activation and interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor, guanylate-binding protein-2 mRNA, graft-derived cell-free DNA, pi-glutathione S-transferase, alpha-glutathione S-transferase and serum HLA class I soluble antigens. Only eosinophil count was tested in multiple studies, and they demonstrated high heterogeneity (I(2) = 72% [95% CI: 0.5–0.99]). IL-2 receptor demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89% [95% CI: 0.78–0.96]) and specificity (81% [95% CI: 0.69–0.89]). Conclusion: IL-2 receptor expression demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, while the peripheral eosinophil count was the only marker tested in more than one study. Presently, liver biopsy remains superior to noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers as most studies exhibited inferior designs, hindering possible translation into clinical application. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6470197/ /pubmed/31031758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00758 Text en Copyright © 2019 Krenzien, Keshi, Splith, Griesel, Kamali, Sauer, Feldbrügge, Pratschke, Leder and Schmelzle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Krenzien, Felix Keshi, Eriselda Splith, Katrin Griesel, Silvan Kamali, Kaan Sauer, Igor M. Feldbrügge, Linda Pratschke, Johann Leder, Annekatrin Schmelzle, Moritz Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies |
title | Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies |
title_full | Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies |
title_short | Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies |
title_sort | diagnostic biomarkers to diagnose acute allograft rejection after liver transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krenzienfelix diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT keshieriselda diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT splithkatrin diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT grieselsilvan diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT kamalikaan diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT sauerigorm diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT feldbruggelinda diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT pratschkejohann diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT lederannekatrin diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies AT schmelzlemoritz diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies |