Cargando…

Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Background: Noninvasive blood and urine markers have been widely explored in recent decades for diagnosing acute rejection after liver tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krenzien, Felix, Keshi, Eriselda, Splith, Katrin, Griesel, Silvan, Kamali, Kaan, Sauer, Igor M., Feldbrügge, Linda, Pratschke, Johann, Leder, Annekatrin, Schmelzle, Moritz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00758
_version_ 1783411747824074752
author Krenzien, Felix
Keshi, Eriselda
Splith, Katrin
Griesel, Silvan
Kamali, Kaan
Sauer, Igor M.
Feldbrügge, Linda
Pratschke, Johann
Leder, Annekatrin
Schmelzle, Moritz
author_facet Krenzien, Felix
Keshi, Eriselda
Splith, Katrin
Griesel, Silvan
Kamali, Kaan
Sauer, Igor M.
Feldbrügge, Linda
Pratschke, Johann
Leder, Annekatrin
Schmelzle, Moritz
author_sort Krenzien, Felix
collection PubMed
description Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Background: Noninvasive blood and urine markers have been widely explored in recent decades for diagnosing acute rejection after liver transplantation. However, none have been translated into routine clinical use so far due to uncertain diagnostic accuracy, and liver biopsy remains the gold standard. Methods: Systematic literature searches of Medline, Cochrane and Embase were conducted up to February 2019 to identify studies evaluating the use of noninvasive markers in diagnosing allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with DerSimonian–Laird weighting and the hierarchical summary receiver operating curve. Results: Of 560 identified studies, 15 studies (1,445 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The following markers were tested: acid labile nitroso-compounds (NOx), serum amyloid A protein, procalcitonin, peripheral blood eosinophil count, peripheral blood T-cell activation and interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor, guanylate-binding protein-2 mRNA, graft-derived cell-free DNA, pi-glutathione S-transferase, alpha-glutathione S-transferase and serum HLA class I soluble antigens. Only eosinophil count was tested in multiple studies, and they demonstrated high heterogeneity (I(2) = 72% [95% CI: 0.5–0.99]). IL-2 receptor demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89% [95% CI: 0.78–0.96]) and specificity (81% [95% CI: 0.69–0.89]). Conclusion: IL-2 receptor expression demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, while the peripheral eosinophil count was the only marker tested in more than one study. Presently, liver biopsy remains superior to noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers as most studies exhibited inferior designs, hindering possible translation into clinical application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6470197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64701972019-04-26 Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Krenzien, Felix Keshi, Eriselda Splith, Katrin Griesel, Silvan Kamali, Kaan Sauer, Igor M. Feldbrügge, Linda Pratschke, Johann Leder, Annekatrin Schmelzle, Moritz Front Immunol Immunology Objective: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Background: Noninvasive blood and urine markers have been widely explored in recent decades for diagnosing acute rejection after liver transplantation. However, none have been translated into routine clinical use so far due to uncertain diagnostic accuracy, and liver biopsy remains the gold standard. Methods: Systematic literature searches of Medline, Cochrane and Embase were conducted up to February 2019 to identify studies evaluating the use of noninvasive markers in diagnosing allograft rejection following liver transplantation. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with DerSimonian–Laird weighting and the hierarchical summary receiver operating curve. Results: Of 560 identified studies, 15 studies (1,445 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The following markers were tested: acid labile nitroso-compounds (NOx), serum amyloid A protein, procalcitonin, peripheral blood eosinophil count, peripheral blood T-cell activation and interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor, guanylate-binding protein-2 mRNA, graft-derived cell-free DNA, pi-glutathione S-transferase, alpha-glutathione S-transferase and serum HLA class I soluble antigens. Only eosinophil count was tested in multiple studies, and they demonstrated high heterogeneity (I(2) = 72% [95% CI: 0.5–0.99]). IL-2 receptor demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89% [95% CI: 0.78–0.96]) and specificity (81% [95% CI: 0.69–0.89]). Conclusion: IL-2 receptor expression demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, while the peripheral eosinophil count was the only marker tested in more than one study. Presently, liver biopsy remains superior to noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers as most studies exhibited inferior designs, hindering possible translation into clinical application. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6470197/ /pubmed/31031758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00758 Text en Copyright © 2019 Krenzien, Keshi, Splith, Griesel, Kamali, Sauer, Feldbrügge, Pratschke, Leder and Schmelzle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Krenzien, Felix
Keshi, Eriselda
Splith, Katrin
Griesel, Silvan
Kamali, Kaan
Sauer, Igor M.
Feldbrügge, Linda
Pratschke, Johann
Leder, Annekatrin
Schmelzle, Moritz
Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_full Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_fullStr Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_short Diagnostic Biomarkers to Diagnose Acute Allograft Rejection After Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
title_sort diagnostic biomarkers to diagnose acute allograft rejection after liver transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00758
work_keys_str_mv AT krenzienfelix diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT keshieriselda diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT splithkatrin diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT grieselsilvan diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT kamalikaan diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT sauerigorm diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT feldbruggelinda diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT pratschkejohann diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT lederannekatrin diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies
AT schmelzlemoritz diagnosticbiomarkerstodiagnoseacuteallograftrejectionafterlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracystudies