Cargando…
Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Renal denervation (RDN) is a catheter-based ablation procedure designed to treat resistant hypertension (RH). The objective of our study is to determine the effect of RDN on blood pressure and renal function in patients with RH in comparison to medical therapy alone. We performed an extensive litera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30996305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42695-9 |
_version_ | 1783411752907571200 |
---|---|
author | Agasthi, Pradyumna Shipman, Justin Arsanjani, Reza Ashukem, Moses Girardo, Marlene. E. Yerasi, Charan Venepally, Nithin. R. Fortuin, Floyd David Mookadam, Farouk |
author_facet | Agasthi, Pradyumna Shipman, Justin Arsanjani, Reza Ashukem, Moses Girardo, Marlene. E. Yerasi, Charan Venepally, Nithin. R. Fortuin, Floyd David Mookadam, Farouk |
author_sort | Agasthi, Pradyumna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Renal denervation (RDN) is a catheter-based ablation procedure designed to treat resistant hypertension (RH). The objective of our study is to determine the effect of RDN on blood pressure and renal function in patients with RH in comparison to medical therapy alone. We performed an extensive literature search for randomized control trials (RCT) reporting office and 24 hr. blood pressure changes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and 6 months. We calculated a weighted standardized mean difference of blood pressure and renal outcomes between RDN and control groups using random effects models. Our search yielded 608 studies of which we included 15 studies for the final analysis. A total of 857 patients were treated with RDN and 616 patients treated with medical therapy ± sham procedure. Only 5 studies were double-blinded RCT with sham control. The adjusted standardized mean difference in the change in office based systolic and diastolic pressures (p = 0.18; p = 0.14); 24 hr. systolic and diastolic pressures (p = 0.20; p = 0.18); and eGFR (p = 0.20) from baseline to 6 months is statistically insignificant with significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed that among sham controlled trials, 24 hr. systolic blood pressure showed a modest but statistically significant benefit favoring renal denervation in patients with RH. Our meta-analysis of 15 RCTs showed no significant benefit of RDN on blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Subgroup analysis of sham control studies showed a modest benefit in 24 hr. systolic blood pressure at 6 months with RDN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6470219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64702192019-04-25 Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Agasthi, Pradyumna Shipman, Justin Arsanjani, Reza Ashukem, Moses Girardo, Marlene. E. Yerasi, Charan Venepally, Nithin. R. Fortuin, Floyd David Mookadam, Farouk Sci Rep Article Renal denervation (RDN) is a catheter-based ablation procedure designed to treat resistant hypertension (RH). The objective of our study is to determine the effect of RDN on blood pressure and renal function in patients with RH in comparison to medical therapy alone. We performed an extensive literature search for randomized control trials (RCT) reporting office and 24 hr. blood pressure changes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and 6 months. We calculated a weighted standardized mean difference of blood pressure and renal outcomes between RDN and control groups using random effects models. Our search yielded 608 studies of which we included 15 studies for the final analysis. A total of 857 patients were treated with RDN and 616 patients treated with medical therapy ± sham procedure. Only 5 studies were double-blinded RCT with sham control. The adjusted standardized mean difference in the change in office based systolic and diastolic pressures (p = 0.18; p = 0.14); 24 hr. systolic and diastolic pressures (p = 0.20; p = 0.18); and eGFR (p = 0.20) from baseline to 6 months is statistically insignificant with significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed that among sham controlled trials, 24 hr. systolic blood pressure showed a modest but statistically significant benefit favoring renal denervation in patients with RH. Our meta-analysis of 15 RCTs showed no significant benefit of RDN on blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Subgroup analysis of sham control studies showed a modest benefit in 24 hr. systolic blood pressure at 6 months with RDN. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6470219/ /pubmed/30996305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42695-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Agasthi, Pradyumna Shipman, Justin Arsanjani, Reza Ashukem, Moses Girardo, Marlene. E. Yerasi, Charan Venepally, Nithin. R. Fortuin, Floyd David Mookadam, Farouk Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | renal denervation for resistant hypertension in the contemporary era: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30996305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42695-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agasthipradyumna renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shipmanjustin renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arsanjanireza renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ashukemmoses renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT girardomarlenee renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yerasicharan renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT venepallynithinr renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fortuinfloyddavid renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mookadamfarouk renaldenervationforresistanthypertensioninthecontemporaryeraasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |