Cargando…

Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand

Gene editing is arguably the most significant recent addition to the modern biotechnology toolbox, bringing both profoundly challenging and enabling opportunities. From a technical point of view the specificity and relative simplicity of these new tools has broadened the potential applications. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudson, Maui, Mead, Aroha Te Pareake, Chagné, David, Roskruge, Nick, Morrison, Sandy, Wilcox, Phillip L., Allan, Andrew C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31032252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00070
_version_ 1783411763050446848
author Hudson, Maui
Mead, Aroha Te Pareake
Chagné, David
Roskruge, Nick
Morrison, Sandy
Wilcox, Phillip L.
Allan, Andrew C.
author_facet Hudson, Maui
Mead, Aroha Te Pareake
Chagné, David
Roskruge, Nick
Morrison, Sandy
Wilcox, Phillip L.
Allan, Andrew C.
author_sort Hudson, Maui
collection PubMed
description Gene editing is arguably the most significant recent addition to the modern biotechnology toolbox, bringing both profoundly challenging and enabling opportunities. From a technical point of view the specificity and relative simplicity of these new tools has broadened the potential applications. However, from an ethical point of view it has re-ignited the debates generated by earlier forms of genetic modification. In New Zealand gene editing is currently considered genetic modification and is subject to approval processes under the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). This process requires decision makers to take into account Māori perspectives. This article outlines previously articulated Māori perspectives on genetic modification and considers the continuing influence of those cultural and ethical arguments within the new context of gene editing. It also explores the range of ways cultural values might be used to analyse the risks and benefits of gene editing in the Aotearoa New Zealand context. Methods used to obtain these perspectives consisted of (a) review of relevant literature regarding lessons learned from the responses of Maori to genetic modification, (b) interviews of selected ‘key Maori informants’ and (c) surveys of self-selected individuals from groups with interests in either genetics or environmental management. The outcomes of this pilot study identified that while Māori informants were not categorically opposed to new and emerging gene editing technologies a priori, they suggest a dynamic approach to regulation is required where specific uses or types of uses are approved on a case by case basis. This study demonstrates how the cultural cues that Māori referenced in the genetic modification debate continue to be relevant in the context of gene editing but that further work is required to characterize the strength of various positions across the broader community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6470265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64702652019-04-26 Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand Hudson, Maui Mead, Aroha Te Pareake Chagné, David Roskruge, Nick Morrison, Sandy Wilcox, Phillip L. Allan, Andrew C. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Gene editing is arguably the most significant recent addition to the modern biotechnology toolbox, bringing both profoundly challenging and enabling opportunities. From a technical point of view the specificity and relative simplicity of these new tools has broadened the potential applications. However, from an ethical point of view it has re-ignited the debates generated by earlier forms of genetic modification. In New Zealand gene editing is currently considered genetic modification and is subject to approval processes under the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). This process requires decision makers to take into account Māori perspectives. This article outlines previously articulated Māori perspectives on genetic modification and considers the continuing influence of those cultural and ethical arguments within the new context of gene editing. It also explores the range of ways cultural values might be used to analyse the risks and benefits of gene editing in the Aotearoa New Zealand context. Methods used to obtain these perspectives consisted of (a) review of relevant literature regarding lessons learned from the responses of Maori to genetic modification, (b) interviews of selected ‘key Maori informants’ and (c) surveys of self-selected individuals from groups with interests in either genetics or environmental management. The outcomes of this pilot study identified that while Māori informants were not categorically opposed to new and emerging gene editing technologies a priori, they suggest a dynamic approach to regulation is required where specific uses or types of uses are approved on a case by case basis. This study demonstrates how the cultural cues that Māori referenced in the genetic modification debate continue to be relevant in the context of gene editing but that further work is required to characterize the strength of various positions across the broader community. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6470265/ /pubmed/31032252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00070 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hudson, Mead, Chagné, Roskruge, Morrison, Wilcox and Allan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Hudson, Maui
Mead, Aroha Te Pareake
Chagné, David
Roskruge, Nick
Morrison, Sandy
Wilcox, Phillip L.
Allan, Andrew C.
Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand
title Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand
title_full Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand
title_fullStr Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand
title_short Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand
title_sort indigenous perspectives and gene editing in aotearoa new zealand
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31032252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00070
work_keys_str_mv AT hudsonmaui indigenousperspectivesandgeneeditinginaotearoanewzealand
AT meadarohatepareake indigenousperspectivesandgeneeditinginaotearoanewzealand
AT chagnedavid indigenousperspectivesandgeneeditinginaotearoanewzealand
AT roskrugenick indigenousperspectivesandgeneeditinginaotearoanewzealand
AT morrisonsandy indigenousperspectivesandgeneeditinginaotearoanewzealand
AT wilcoxphillipl indigenousperspectivesandgeneeditinginaotearoanewzealand
AT allanandrewc indigenousperspectivesandgeneeditinginaotearoanewzealand