Cargando…

Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the early outcomes, including all-cause revisions, aseptic revisions, and reoperations after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a single modern modular femoral stem design. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study on a consecutive series of 62 patients (65 hips) who un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelt, Christopher E., Stagg, Marissa L., Van Dine, Christin, Anderson, Mike B., Peters, Christopher L., Gililland, Jeremy M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2018.10.004
_version_ 1783411781738168320
author Pelt, Christopher E.
Stagg, Marissa L.
Van Dine, Christin
Anderson, Mike B.
Peters, Christopher L.
Gililland, Jeremy M.
author_facet Pelt, Christopher E.
Stagg, Marissa L.
Van Dine, Christin
Anderson, Mike B.
Peters, Christopher L.
Gililland, Jeremy M.
author_sort Pelt, Christopher E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We evaluated the early outcomes, including all-cause revisions, aseptic revisions, and reoperations after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a single modern modular femoral stem design. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study on a consecutive series of 62 patients (65 hips) who underwent revision THA with a modern modular femoral stem system, between January 2011 and October 2015, at a single academic medical center was performed. A cumulative incidence competing risk model was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of failure with death as the competing risk. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence rate of all-cause revision THA was 14.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%–24%) at 2 years when accounting for the competing risk of death. The rate of aseptic revisions was 6.8% (95% CI, 0.1%–13%), and the rate of all-cause reoperations was 21.6% (95% CI, 11%–31%). Ten THA cases (15%) underwent re-revision THA for any reason: five for infection and five for aseptic failures. The mean time to re-revision was 1 year (range, 0.04–5.34). Patients with a preoperative Mallory classification of 3 or more were at greater risk for reoperation (sub-hazard rate, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.54–9.53; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Although the high incidence of reoperation illustrates the complexity of the revision THA population, particularly related to infection and joint instability, the relatively low rate of aseptic failures, minimal radiographic subsidence, and the lack of modular junctional failures suggest that the use of this modular revision THA system may provide adequate fixation and could be considered as a viable treatment option in the setting of revision THA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6470366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64703662019-04-24 Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases Pelt, Christopher E. Stagg, Marissa L. Van Dine, Christin Anderson, Mike B. Peters, Christopher L. Gililland, Jeremy M. Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: We evaluated the early outcomes, including all-cause revisions, aseptic revisions, and reoperations after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a single modern modular femoral stem design. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study on a consecutive series of 62 patients (65 hips) who underwent revision THA with a modern modular femoral stem system, between January 2011 and October 2015, at a single academic medical center was performed. A cumulative incidence competing risk model was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of failure with death as the competing risk. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence rate of all-cause revision THA was 14.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%–24%) at 2 years when accounting for the competing risk of death. The rate of aseptic revisions was 6.8% (95% CI, 0.1%–13%), and the rate of all-cause reoperations was 21.6% (95% CI, 11%–31%). Ten THA cases (15%) underwent re-revision THA for any reason: five for infection and five for aseptic failures. The mean time to re-revision was 1 year (range, 0.04–5.34). Patients with a preoperative Mallory classification of 3 or more were at greater risk for reoperation (sub-hazard rate, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.54–9.53; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Although the high incidence of reoperation illustrates the complexity of the revision THA population, particularly related to infection and joint instability, the relatively low rate of aseptic failures, minimal radiographic subsidence, and the lack of modular junctional failures suggest that the use of this modular revision THA system may provide adequate fixation and could be considered as a viable treatment option in the setting of revision THA. Elsevier 2018-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6470366/ /pubmed/31020033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2018.10.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Pelt, Christopher E.
Stagg, Marissa L.
Van Dine, Christin
Anderson, Mike B.
Peters, Christopher L.
Gililland, Jeremy M.
Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases
title Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases
title_full Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases
title_fullStr Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases
title_full_unstemmed Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases
title_short Early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases
title_sort early outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with a modern modular femoral revision stem in 65 consecutive cases
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2018.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT peltchristophere earlyoutcomesafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywithamodernmodularfemoralrevisionstemin65consecutivecases
AT staggmarissal earlyoutcomesafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywithamodernmodularfemoralrevisionstemin65consecutivecases
AT vandinechristin earlyoutcomesafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywithamodernmodularfemoralrevisionstemin65consecutivecases
AT andersonmikeb earlyoutcomesafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywithamodernmodularfemoralrevisionstemin65consecutivecases
AT peterschristopherl earlyoutcomesafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywithamodernmodularfemoralrevisionstemin65consecutivecases
AT gilillandjeremym earlyoutcomesafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywithamodernmodularfemoralrevisionstemin65consecutivecases