Cargando…

Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study

PURPOSE: To analyze the keratectasia area (KEA) shown in corneal topography before and after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus (KC) and figure out whether KEA is appropriate for evaluating the effect of CXL. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 34 eye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jia, Li, Zhiwei, Zhang, Huankai, Gao, Ning, Mu, Guoying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1762537
_version_ 1783411798651699200
author Wang, Jia
Li, Zhiwei
Zhang, Huankai
Gao, Ning
Mu, Guoying
author_facet Wang, Jia
Li, Zhiwei
Zhang, Huankai
Gao, Ning
Mu, Guoying
author_sort Wang, Jia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze the keratectasia area (KEA) shown in corneal topography before and after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus (KC) and figure out whether KEA is appropriate for evaluating the effect of CXL. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 34 eyes from 24 progressive KC patients who have underwent CXL from 2015 to 2017. Area with K-value more than 47D shown in the corneal topography was marked and identified as KEA. Keratometry (K1, K2, and Kmax), KEA, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were evaluated preoperatively or at months 3, 6, and 12 postoperatively. The changes of KEA before and after operation were evaluated. The relation of KEA and other parameters, including Kmax and TCT, was analyzed. RESULTS: Linear regression model revealed the KEA, Kmax, K1, and K2 decreased after CXL in model y = 0.9622 -0.02408 x (P<0.05), y = 0.9982 -0.003469 x(P<0.05), y = 0.9977 + -0.001347 x(P<0.05), y = 0.9992 + -0.001779 x(P<0.05) (y represents KEA, Kmax, K1, or K2; x represents time (month)). The KEA is significantly decreased in early stage (before month 3) (P<0.05); however, the Kmax, K1, and K2 have no significant decrease in early stage (P= 0.09, 0.19, 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The KEA is more sensitive than K-value in describing the morphological changes of cornea after CXL, especially in early stage after treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6470445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64704452019-05-09 Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study Wang, Jia Li, Zhiwei Zhang, Huankai Gao, Ning Mu, Guoying Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To analyze the keratectasia area (KEA) shown in corneal topography before and after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus (KC) and figure out whether KEA is appropriate for evaluating the effect of CXL. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 34 eyes from 24 progressive KC patients who have underwent CXL from 2015 to 2017. Area with K-value more than 47D shown in the corneal topography was marked and identified as KEA. Keratometry (K1, K2, and Kmax), KEA, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were evaluated preoperatively or at months 3, 6, and 12 postoperatively. The changes of KEA before and after operation were evaluated. The relation of KEA and other parameters, including Kmax and TCT, was analyzed. RESULTS: Linear regression model revealed the KEA, Kmax, K1, and K2 decreased after CXL in model y = 0.9622 -0.02408 x (P<0.05), y = 0.9982 -0.003469 x(P<0.05), y = 0.9977 + -0.001347 x(P<0.05), y = 0.9992 + -0.001779 x(P<0.05) (y represents KEA, Kmax, K1, or K2; x represents time (month)). The KEA is significantly decreased in early stage (before month 3) (P<0.05); however, the Kmax, K1, and K2 have no significant decrease in early stage (P= 0.09, 0.19, 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The KEA is more sensitive than K-value in describing the morphological changes of cornea after CXL, especially in early stage after treatment. Hindawi 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6470445/ /pubmed/31073520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1762537 Text en Copyright © 2019 Jia Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Jia
Li, Zhiwei
Zhang, Huankai
Gao, Ning
Mu, Guoying
Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study
title Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study
title_full Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study
title_short Whether Keratectasia Area Shown in Corneal Topography Is Appropriate for Evaluating the Effect of Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study
title_sort whether keratectasia area shown in corneal topography is appropriate for evaluating the effect of corneal cross-linking for keratoconus: a 12-month follow-up study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1762537
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjia whetherkeratectasiaareashownincornealtopographyisappropriateforevaluatingtheeffectofcornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusa12monthfollowupstudy
AT lizhiwei whetherkeratectasiaareashownincornealtopographyisappropriateforevaluatingtheeffectofcornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusa12monthfollowupstudy
AT zhanghuankai whetherkeratectasiaareashownincornealtopographyisappropriateforevaluatingtheeffectofcornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusa12monthfollowupstudy
AT gaoning whetherkeratectasiaareashownincornealtopographyisappropriateforevaluatingtheeffectofcornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusa12monthfollowupstudy
AT muguoying whetherkeratectasiaareashownincornealtopographyisappropriateforevaluatingtheeffectofcornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusa12monthfollowupstudy