Cargando…

Structured Monolithic Catalysts vs. Fixed Bed for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane

The deposition of V-based catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propene on cordierite honeycomb monoliths was optimised as a strategy to decrease the contact time in a structured reactor with respect to a conventional fixed bed one. 10 wt% VO(x) supported over SiO(2) or Al(2)O(3)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossetti, Ilenia, Bahadori, Elnaz, Tripodi, Antonio, Ramis, Gianguido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30884805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12060884
_version_ 1783411966202609664
author Rossetti, Ilenia
Bahadori, Elnaz
Tripodi, Antonio
Ramis, Gianguido
author_facet Rossetti, Ilenia
Bahadori, Elnaz
Tripodi, Antonio
Ramis, Gianguido
author_sort Rossetti, Ilenia
collection PubMed
description The deposition of V-based catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propene on cordierite honeycomb monoliths was optimised as a strategy to decrease the contact time in a structured reactor with respect to a conventional fixed bed one. 10 wt% VO(x) supported over SiO(2) or Al(2)O(3) were used as catalysts, deposed over the monolith using silica or alumina as primer, respectively. Both the alumina supported catalyst and the bohemite primer precursor were effectively deposed by dip-coating from stable powder suspensions, whereas insufficient adhesion was obtained when loading pre-synthesised SiO(2) over the cordierite. A new method based on sol-gel production of SiO(2) from tetraethylortosilicate (TEOS) over the monolith surface was set up. A correlation was derived for the prevision of the amount of silica deposed depending on the amount of TEOS. Both primer and catalyst loading were optimised as for uniformity and stability of the coating and resulted 0.5–1 wt % primer and 0.15 wt % of catalyst. Activity testing confirmed the strong improvement of propene productivity by increasing the time factor (i.e. Ncm(3) of flowing reactant/min g(cat)), which ended in a one order of magnitude increase of productivity for the honeycomb-supported samples with respect to the fixed bed configuration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6471166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64711662019-04-27 Structured Monolithic Catalysts vs. Fixed Bed for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane Rossetti, Ilenia Bahadori, Elnaz Tripodi, Antonio Ramis, Gianguido Materials (Basel) Article The deposition of V-based catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propene on cordierite honeycomb monoliths was optimised as a strategy to decrease the contact time in a structured reactor with respect to a conventional fixed bed one. 10 wt% VO(x) supported over SiO(2) or Al(2)O(3) were used as catalysts, deposed over the monolith using silica or alumina as primer, respectively. Both the alumina supported catalyst and the bohemite primer precursor were effectively deposed by dip-coating from stable powder suspensions, whereas insufficient adhesion was obtained when loading pre-synthesised SiO(2) over the cordierite. A new method based on sol-gel production of SiO(2) from tetraethylortosilicate (TEOS) over the monolith surface was set up. A correlation was derived for the prevision of the amount of silica deposed depending on the amount of TEOS. Both primer and catalyst loading were optimised as for uniformity and stability of the coating and resulted 0.5–1 wt % primer and 0.15 wt % of catalyst. Activity testing confirmed the strong improvement of propene productivity by increasing the time factor (i.e. Ncm(3) of flowing reactant/min g(cat)), which ended in a one order of magnitude increase of productivity for the honeycomb-supported samples with respect to the fixed bed configuration. MDPI 2019-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6471166/ /pubmed/30884805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12060884 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rossetti, Ilenia
Bahadori, Elnaz
Tripodi, Antonio
Ramis, Gianguido
Structured Monolithic Catalysts vs. Fixed Bed for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane
title Structured Monolithic Catalysts vs. Fixed Bed for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane
title_full Structured Monolithic Catalysts vs. Fixed Bed for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane
title_fullStr Structured Monolithic Catalysts vs. Fixed Bed for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane
title_full_unstemmed Structured Monolithic Catalysts vs. Fixed Bed for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane
title_short Structured Monolithic Catalysts vs. Fixed Bed for the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane
title_sort structured monolithic catalysts vs. fixed bed for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30884805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12060884
work_keys_str_mv AT rossettiilenia structuredmonolithiccatalystsvsfixedbedfortheoxidativedehydrogenationofpropane
AT bahadorielnaz structuredmonolithiccatalystsvsfixedbedfortheoxidativedehydrogenationofpropane
AT tripodiantonio structuredmonolithiccatalystsvsfixedbedfortheoxidativedehydrogenationofpropane
AT ramisgianguido structuredmonolithiccatalystsvsfixedbedfortheoxidativedehydrogenationofpropane