Cargando…

The Response of More Health Focused and Less Health Focused People to a Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Label on Discretionary Snack Foods

A Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) label shows the minutes of physical activity required to burn off the caloric content of a particular food. This study investigated the influence of PACE labelling on liking and consumption of discretionary snack foods in a group of more health focused a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartley, Claudia, Keast, Russell SJ, Liem, Djin Gie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30823437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11030525
_version_ 1783412066217885696
author Hartley, Claudia
Keast, Russell SJ
Liem, Djin Gie
author_facet Hartley, Claudia
Keast, Russell SJ
Liem, Djin Gie
author_sort Hartley, Claudia
collection PubMed
description A Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) label shows the minutes of physical activity required to burn off the caloric content of a particular food. This study investigated the influence of PACE labelling on liking and consumption of discretionary snack foods in a group of more health focused and less health focused consumers. Participants (n = 97) tasted and rated (i.e., liking, prospective consumption) a range of snack foods with or without a PACE label. Total sampling consumption was also measured. Participants completed a shortened version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and the General Health Interest Scale questionnaire. Paired samples t-test, independent samples t-tests, a General Linear Model and Chi-Square tests were used to check for statistical significance. For more health focused participants (n = 57), the PACE label decreased only liking (p = 0.02). The PACE label was not effective in reducing liking (p = 0.49), prospective consumption (defined as the amount of the sample participants thought that they could consume) (p = 0.10) or consumption (p = 0.41) of energy-dense discretionary snack foods for less health focused individuals (n = 40). The level of participants’ physical activity did not facilitate the influence of PACE labelling on liking, consumption or prospective consumption. The PACE label was found to not be effective among less health focused individuals or the overall sample population. Therefore, the PACE label may not be an effective labelling strategy to reduce the liking or consumption of discretionary snack foods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6471609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64716092019-04-25 The Response of More Health Focused and Less Health Focused People to a Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Label on Discretionary Snack Foods Hartley, Claudia Keast, Russell SJ Liem, Djin Gie Nutrients Article A Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) label shows the minutes of physical activity required to burn off the caloric content of a particular food. This study investigated the influence of PACE labelling on liking and consumption of discretionary snack foods in a group of more health focused and less health focused consumers. Participants (n = 97) tasted and rated (i.e., liking, prospective consumption) a range of snack foods with or without a PACE label. Total sampling consumption was also measured. Participants completed a shortened version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and the General Health Interest Scale questionnaire. Paired samples t-test, independent samples t-tests, a General Linear Model and Chi-Square tests were used to check for statistical significance. For more health focused participants (n = 57), the PACE label decreased only liking (p = 0.02). The PACE label was not effective in reducing liking (p = 0.49), prospective consumption (defined as the amount of the sample participants thought that they could consume) (p = 0.10) or consumption (p = 0.41) of energy-dense discretionary snack foods for less health focused individuals (n = 40). The level of participants’ physical activity did not facilitate the influence of PACE labelling on liking, consumption or prospective consumption. The PACE label was found to not be effective among less health focused individuals or the overall sample population. Therefore, the PACE label may not be an effective labelling strategy to reduce the liking or consumption of discretionary snack foods. MDPI 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6471609/ /pubmed/30823437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11030525 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hartley, Claudia
Keast, Russell SJ
Liem, Djin Gie
The Response of More Health Focused and Less Health Focused People to a Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Label on Discretionary Snack Foods
title The Response of More Health Focused and Less Health Focused People to a Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Label on Discretionary Snack Foods
title_full The Response of More Health Focused and Less Health Focused People to a Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Label on Discretionary Snack Foods
title_fullStr The Response of More Health Focused and Less Health Focused People to a Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Label on Discretionary Snack Foods
title_full_unstemmed The Response of More Health Focused and Less Health Focused People to a Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Label on Discretionary Snack Foods
title_short The Response of More Health Focused and Less Health Focused People to a Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Label on Discretionary Snack Foods
title_sort response of more health focused and less health focused people to a physical activity calorie equivalent label on discretionary snack foods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30823437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11030525
work_keys_str_mv AT hartleyclaudia theresponseofmorehealthfocusedandlesshealthfocusedpeopletoaphysicalactivitycalorieequivalentlabelondiscretionarysnackfoods
AT keastrussellsj theresponseofmorehealthfocusedandlesshealthfocusedpeopletoaphysicalactivitycalorieequivalentlabelondiscretionarysnackfoods
AT liemdjingie theresponseofmorehealthfocusedandlesshealthfocusedpeopletoaphysicalactivitycalorieequivalentlabelondiscretionarysnackfoods
AT hartleyclaudia responseofmorehealthfocusedandlesshealthfocusedpeopletoaphysicalactivitycalorieequivalentlabelondiscretionarysnackfoods
AT keastrussellsj responseofmorehealthfocusedandlesshealthfocusedpeopletoaphysicalactivitycalorieequivalentlabelondiscretionarysnackfoods
AT liemdjingie responseofmorehealthfocusedandlesshealthfocusedpeopletoaphysicalactivitycalorieequivalentlabelondiscretionarysnackfoods