Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide
Research in the field of hydrate formation requires more focus upon its modelling to enable the researchers to predict and assess the hydrate formation and its characteristics. The main focus of the study was to analyze the deviations induced in various parameters related to hydrate nucleation cause...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30889806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061055 |
_version_ | 1783412068760682496 |
---|---|
author | Thoutam, Pranav Rezaei Gomari, Sina Ahmad, Faizan Islam, Meez |
author_facet | Thoutam, Pranav Rezaei Gomari, Sina Ahmad, Faizan Islam, Meez |
author_sort | Thoutam, Pranav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research in the field of hydrate formation requires more focus upon its modelling to enable the researchers to predict and assess the hydrate formation and its characteristics. The main focus of the study was to analyze the deviations induced in various parameters related to hydrate nucleation caused by the choice of different measuring correlations or methods of their sub-components. To serve this purpose under a range of operational conditions, parameters of hydrate nucleation such as rates of nucleation and crystal growth, critical radius of the nucleus, and theoretical induction time for carbon dioxide and methane were considered in this study. From these measurements, we have quantitatively compared the ease of hydrate formation in CO(2) and CH(4) systems in terms of nucleation while analyzing how various correlations for intermediate parameters were affecting the final output. Values of these parameters were produced under the considered bracket of operational conditions and distributed among six cases using both general and guest-gas specific correlations for gas dissolution and fugacity and their combinations. The isotherms and isobars produced from some of the cases differed from each other considerably. The rate of nucleation in one case showed an exponential deviation with a value over 1 × 10(28) at 5 MPa, while the rest showed values as multiples of 10(6). These deviations explain how sensitive hydrate formation is to processing variables and their respective correlations, highlighting the importance of understanding the applicability of semi-empirical correlations. An attempt was made to define the induction time from a theoretical perspective and derive a relevant equation from the existing models. This equation was validated and analyzed within these six cases from the experimental observations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6471625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64716252019-04-26 Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide Thoutam, Pranav Rezaei Gomari, Sina Ahmad, Faizan Islam, Meez Molecules Article Research in the field of hydrate formation requires more focus upon its modelling to enable the researchers to predict and assess the hydrate formation and its characteristics. The main focus of the study was to analyze the deviations induced in various parameters related to hydrate nucleation caused by the choice of different measuring correlations or methods of their sub-components. To serve this purpose under a range of operational conditions, parameters of hydrate nucleation such as rates of nucleation and crystal growth, critical radius of the nucleus, and theoretical induction time for carbon dioxide and methane were considered in this study. From these measurements, we have quantitatively compared the ease of hydrate formation in CO(2) and CH(4) systems in terms of nucleation while analyzing how various correlations for intermediate parameters were affecting the final output. Values of these parameters were produced under the considered bracket of operational conditions and distributed among six cases using both general and guest-gas specific correlations for gas dissolution and fugacity and their combinations. The isotherms and isobars produced from some of the cases differed from each other considerably. The rate of nucleation in one case showed an exponential deviation with a value over 1 × 10(28) at 5 MPa, while the rest showed values as multiples of 10(6). These deviations explain how sensitive hydrate formation is to processing variables and their respective correlations, highlighting the importance of understanding the applicability of semi-empirical correlations. An attempt was made to define the induction time from a theoretical perspective and derive a relevant equation from the existing models. This equation was validated and analyzed within these six cases from the experimental observations. MDPI 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6471625/ /pubmed/30889806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061055 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Thoutam, Pranav Rezaei Gomari, Sina Ahmad, Faizan Islam, Meez Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide |
title | Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide |
title_sort | comparative analysis of hydrate nucleation for methane and carbon dioxide |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30889806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thoutampranav comparativeanalysisofhydratenucleationformethaneandcarbondioxide AT rezaeigomarisina comparativeanalysisofhydratenucleationformethaneandcarbondioxide AT ahmadfaizan comparativeanalysisofhydratenucleationformethaneandcarbondioxide AT islammeez comparativeanalysisofhydratenucleationformethaneandcarbondioxide |