Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide

Research in the field of hydrate formation requires more focus upon its modelling to enable the researchers to predict and assess the hydrate formation and its characteristics. The main focus of the study was to analyze the deviations induced in various parameters related to hydrate nucleation cause...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thoutam, Pranav, Rezaei Gomari, Sina, Ahmad, Faizan, Islam, Meez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30889806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061055
_version_ 1783412068760682496
author Thoutam, Pranav
Rezaei Gomari, Sina
Ahmad, Faizan
Islam, Meez
author_facet Thoutam, Pranav
Rezaei Gomari, Sina
Ahmad, Faizan
Islam, Meez
author_sort Thoutam, Pranav
collection PubMed
description Research in the field of hydrate formation requires more focus upon its modelling to enable the researchers to predict and assess the hydrate formation and its characteristics. The main focus of the study was to analyze the deviations induced in various parameters related to hydrate nucleation caused by the choice of different measuring correlations or methods of their sub-components. To serve this purpose under a range of operational conditions, parameters of hydrate nucleation such as rates of nucleation and crystal growth, critical radius of the nucleus, and theoretical induction time for carbon dioxide and methane were considered in this study. From these measurements, we have quantitatively compared the ease of hydrate formation in CO(2) and CH(4) systems in terms of nucleation while analyzing how various correlations for intermediate parameters were affecting the final output. Values of these parameters were produced under the considered bracket of operational conditions and distributed among six cases using both general and guest-gas specific correlations for gas dissolution and fugacity and their combinations. The isotherms and isobars produced from some of the cases differed from each other considerably. The rate of nucleation in one case showed an exponential deviation with a value over 1 × 10(28) at 5 MPa, while the rest showed values as multiples of 10(6). These deviations explain how sensitive hydrate formation is to processing variables and their respective correlations, highlighting the importance of understanding the applicability of semi-empirical correlations. An attempt was made to define the induction time from a theoretical perspective and derive a relevant equation from the existing models. This equation was validated and analyzed within these six cases from the experimental observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6471625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64716252019-04-26 Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide Thoutam, Pranav Rezaei Gomari, Sina Ahmad, Faizan Islam, Meez Molecules Article Research in the field of hydrate formation requires more focus upon its modelling to enable the researchers to predict and assess the hydrate formation and its characteristics. The main focus of the study was to analyze the deviations induced in various parameters related to hydrate nucleation caused by the choice of different measuring correlations or methods of their sub-components. To serve this purpose under a range of operational conditions, parameters of hydrate nucleation such as rates of nucleation and crystal growth, critical radius of the nucleus, and theoretical induction time for carbon dioxide and methane were considered in this study. From these measurements, we have quantitatively compared the ease of hydrate formation in CO(2) and CH(4) systems in terms of nucleation while analyzing how various correlations for intermediate parameters were affecting the final output. Values of these parameters were produced under the considered bracket of operational conditions and distributed among six cases using both general and guest-gas specific correlations for gas dissolution and fugacity and their combinations. The isotherms and isobars produced from some of the cases differed from each other considerably. The rate of nucleation in one case showed an exponential deviation with a value over 1 × 10(28) at 5 MPa, while the rest showed values as multiples of 10(6). These deviations explain how sensitive hydrate formation is to processing variables and their respective correlations, highlighting the importance of understanding the applicability of semi-empirical correlations. An attempt was made to define the induction time from a theoretical perspective and derive a relevant equation from the existing models. This equation was validated and analyzed within these six cases from the experimental observations. MDPI 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6471625/ /pubmed/30889806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061055 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Thoutam, Pranav
Rezaei Gomari, Sina
Ahmad, Faizan
Islam, Meez
Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_full Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_short Comparative Analysis of Hydrate Nucleation for Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_sort comparative analysis of hydrate nucleation for methane and carbon dioxide
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30889806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061055
work_keys_str_mv AT thoutampranav comparativeanalysisofhydratenucleationformethaneandcarbondioxide
AT rezaeigomarisina comparativeanalysisofhydratenucleationformethaneandcarbondioxide
AT ahmadfaizan comparativeanalysisofhydratenucleationformethaneandcarbondioxide
AT islammeez comparativeanalysisofhydratenucleationformethaneandcarbondioxide