Cargando…

The Patchy Distribution of Restriction–Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria

Restriction–modification (RM) systems in bacteria are implicated in multiple biological roles ranging from defense against parasitic genetic elements, to selfish addiction cassettes, and barriers to gene transfer and lineage homogenization. In bacteria, DNA-methylation without cognate restriction al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fullmer, Matthew S., Ouellette, Matthew, Louyakis, Artemis S., Papke, R. Thane, Gogarten, Johann Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893937
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10030233
_version_ 1783412094013538304
author Fullmer, Matthew S.
Ouellette, Matthew
Louyakis, Artemis S.
Papke, R. Thane
Gogarten, Johann Peter
author_facet Fullmer, Matthew S.
Ouellette, Matthew
Louyakis, Artemis S.
Papke, R. Thane
Gogarten, Johann Peter
author_sort Fullmer, Matthew S.
collection PubMed
description Restriction–modification (RM) systems in bacteria are implicated in multiple biological roles ranging from defense against parasitic genetic elements, to selfish addiction cassettes, and barriers to gene transfer and lineage homogenization. In bacteria, DNA-methylation without cognate restriction also plays important roles in DNA replication, mismatch repair, protein expression, and in biasing DNA uptake. Little is known about archaeal RM systems and DNA methylation. To elucidate further understanding for the role of RM systems and DNA methylation in Archaea, we undertook a survey of the presence of RM system genes and related genes, including orphan DNA methylases, in the halophilic archaeal class Halobacteria. Our results reveal that some orphan DNA methyltransferase genes were highly conserved among lineages indicating an important functional constraint, whereas RM systems demonstrated patchy patterns of presence and absence. This irregular distribution is due to frequent horizontal gene transfer and gene loss, a finding suggesting that the evolution and life cycle of RM systems may be best described as that of a selfish genetic element. A putative target motif (CTAG) of one of the orphan methylases was underrepresented in all of the analyzed genomes, whereas another motif (GATC) was overrepresented in most of the haloarchaeal genomes, particularly in those that encoded the cognate orphan methylase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6471742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64717422019-04-27 The Patchy Distribution of Restriction–Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria Fullmer, Matthew S. Ouellette, Matthew Louyakis, Artemis S. Papke, R. Thane Gogarten, Johann Peter Genes (Basel) Article Restriction–modification (RM) systems in bacteria are implicated in multiple biological roles ranging from defense against parasitic genetic elements, to selfish addiction cassettes, and barriers to gene transfer and lineage homogenization. In bacteria, DNA-methylation without cognate restriction also plays important roles in DNA replication, mismatch repair, protein expression, and in biasing DNA uptake. Little is known about archaeal RM systems and DNA methylation. To elucidate further understanding for the role of RM systems and DNA methylation in Archaea, we undertook a survey of the presence of RM system genes and related genes, including orphan DNA methylases, in the halophilic archaeal class Halobacteria. Our results reveal that some orphan DNA methyltransferase genes were highly conserved among lineages indicating an important functional constraint, whereas RM systems demonstrated patchy patterns of presence and absence. This irregular distribution is due to frequent horizontal gene transfer and gene loss, a finding suggesting that the evolution and life cycle of RM systems may be best described as that of a selfish genetic element. A putative target motif (CTAG) of one of the orphan methylases was underrepresented in all of the analyzed genomes, whereas another motif (GATC) was overrepresented in most of the haloarchaeal genomes, particularly in those that encoded the cognate orphan methylase. MDPI 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6471742/ /pubmed/30893937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10030233 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fullmer, Matthew S.
Ouellette, Matthew
Louyakis, Artemis S.
Papke, R. Thane
Gogarten, Johann Peter
The Patchy Distribution of Restriction–Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria
title The Patchy Distribution of Restriction–Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria
title_full The Patchy Distribution of Restriction–Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria
title_fullStr The Patchy Distribution of Restriction–Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria
title_full_unstemmed The Patchy Distribution of Restriction–Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria
title_short The Patchy Distribution of Restriction–Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria
title_sort patchy distribution of restriction–modification system genes and the conservation of orphan methyltransferases in halobacteria
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893937
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10030233
work_keys_str_mv AT fullmermatthews thepatchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT ouellettematthew thepatchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT louyakisartemiss thepatchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT papkerthane thepatchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT gogartenjohannpeter thepatchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT fullmermatthews patchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT ouellettematthew patchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT louyakisartemiss patchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT papkerthane patchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria
AT gogartenjohannpeter patchydistributionofrestrictionmodificationsystemgenesandtheconservationoforphanmethyltransferasesinhalobacteria