Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Namilumab (AMG203), an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety in patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30999929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x |
_version_ | 1783412122713063424 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Peter C. Saurigny, Didier Vencovsky, Jiri Takeuchi, Tsutomu Nakamura, Tadashi Matsievskaia, Galina Hunt, Barbara Wagner, Thomas Souberbielle, Bernard |
author_facet | Taylor, Peter C. Saurigny, Didier Vencovsky, Jiri Takeuchi, Tsutomu Nakamura, Tadashi Matsievskaia, Galina Hunt, Barbara Wagner, Thomas Souberbielle, Bernard |
author_sort | Taylor, Peter C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Namilumab (AMG203), an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR) or anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy (TNF-IR). METHODS: Subcutaneous namilumab (20, 80, or 150 mg) or placebo was administered at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 10 in patients on stable background methotrexate therapy who were with MTX-IR or TNF-IR. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein version (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 comparing each of the three doses of namilumab to placebo. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events (AEs) and pulmonary parameters. Results were analysed using the per-protocol population. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients from Europe and Japan (48.4 ± 12.02 years old; 77.8% female; mean DAS28-CRP 5.60–5.79; rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibodies + 75%) were randomized to placebo or namilumab 20, 80, or 150 mg (n = 27, 28, 25, and 28, respectively). Ninety-two were MTX-IR; 16 were TNF-IR. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in DAS28-CRP (p = 0.005) was seen for namilumab 150 mg versus placebo and separation was seen as early as week 2 for namilumab 150 mg (p < 0.05), with higher ACR50 and response rates versus placebo at week 12. A dose-response effect was observed across the DAS28-CRP endpoint with separation versus placebo evident from week 2. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were nasopharyngitis (18.5%, 17.9%, 4.0%, 14.3%), dyspnoea (0.0%, 3.6%, 8.0%, 10.7%), bronchitis (7.4%, 3.6%, 4.0%, 3.6%), and headache (3.7%, 3.6%, 12.0%, 0.0%) for placebo and 20, 80, or 150 mg of namilumab, respectively. No serious infections were observed. One serious AE (myocardial infarction) was observed with 150 mg of namilumab. There was no apparent dose relationship for AEs. A biomarker-based disease activity score showed a dose-dependent decrease at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study demonstrates the benefit of inhibiting macrophage activity targeting the GM-CSF for RA. The study met its primary endpoint with a clear dose-response effect. An acceptable tolerability profile was demonstrated over the 12-week study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NEXUS; NCT02379091, submitted November 28, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6471864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64718642019-04-24 Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial Taylor, Peter C. Saurigny, Didier Vencovsky, Jiri Takeuchi, Tsutomu Nakamura, Tadashi Matsievskaia, Galina Hunt, Barbara Wagner, Thomas Souberbielle, Bernard Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Namilumab (AMG203), an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR) or anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy (TNF-IR). METHODS: Subcutaneous namilumab (20, 80, or 150 mg) or placebo was administered at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 10 in patients on stable background methotrexate therapy who were with MTX-IR or TNF-IR. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein version (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 comparing each of the three doses of namilumab to placebo. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events (AEs) and pulmonary parameters. Results were analysed using the per-protocol population. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients from Europe and Japan (48.4 ± 12.02 years old; 77.8% female; mean DAS28-CRP 5.60–5.79; rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibodies + 75%) were randomized to placebo or namilumab 20, 80, or 150 mg (n = 27, 28, 25, and 28, respectively). Ninety-two were MTX-IR; 16 were TNF-IR. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in DAS28-CRP (p = 0.005) was seen for namilumab 150 mg versus placebo and separation was seen as early as week 2 for namilumab 150 mg (p < 0.05), with higher ACR50 and response rates versus placebo at week 12. A dose-response effect was observed across the DAS28-CRP endpoint with separation versus placebo evident from week 2. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were nasopharyngitis (18.5%, 17.9%, 4.0%, 14.3%), dyspnoea (0.0%, 3.6%, 8.0%, 10.7%), bronchitis (7.4%, 3.6%, 4.0%, 3.6%), and headache (3.7%, 3.6%, 12.0%, 0.0%) for placebo and 20, 80, or 150 mg of namilumab, respectively. No serious infections were observed. One serious AE (myocardial infarction) was observed with 150 mg of namilumab. There was no apparent dose relationship for AEs. A biomarker-based disease activity score showed a dose-dependent decrease at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study demonstrates the benefit of inhibiting macrophage activity targeting the GM-CSF for RA. The study met its primary endpoint with a clear dose-response effect. An acceptable tolerability profile was demonstrated over the 12-week study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NEXUS; NCT02379091, submitted November 28, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-18 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6471864/ /pubmed/30999929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Taylor, Peter C. Saurigny, Didier Vencovsky, Jiri Takeuchi, Tsutomu Nakamura, Tadashi Matsievskaia, Galina Hunt, Barbara Wagner, Thomas Souberbielle, Bernard Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (gm-csf) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ra) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-tnf (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30999929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorpeterc efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT saurignydidier efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT vencovskyjiri efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT takeuchitsutomu efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT nakamuratadashi efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT matsievskaiagalina efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT huntbarbara efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT wagnerthomas efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT souberbiellebernard efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn AT efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn |