Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Namilumab (AMG203), an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety in patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Peter C., Saurigny, Didier, Vencovsky, Jiri, Takeuchi, Tsutomu, Nakamura, Tadashi, Matsievskaia, Galina, Hunt, Barbara, Wagner, Thomas, Souberbielle, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30999929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x
_version_ 1783412122713063424
author Taylor, Peter C.
Saurigny, Didier
Vencovsky, Jiri
Takeuchi, Tsutomu
Nakamura, Tadashi
Matsievskaia, Galina
Hunt, Barbara
Wagner, Thomas
Souberbielle, Bernard
author_facet Taylor, Peter C.
Saurigny, Didier
Vencovsky, Jiri
Takeuchi, Tsutomu
Nakamura, Tadashi
Matsievskaia, Galina
Hunt, Barbara
Wagner, Thomas
Souberbielle, Bernard
author_sort Taylor, Peter C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Namilumab (AMG203), an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR) or anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy (TNF-IR). METHODS: Subcutaneous namilumab (20, 80, or 150 mg) or placebo was administered at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 10 in patients on stable background methotrexate therapy who were with MTX-IR or TNF-IR. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein version (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 comparing each of the three doses of namilumab to placebo. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events (AEs) and pulmonary parameters. Results were analysed using the per-protocol population. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients from Europe and Japan (48.4 ± 12.02 years old; 77.8% female; mean DAS28-CRP 5.60–5.79; rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibodies + 75%) were randomized to placebo or namilumab 20, 80, or 150 mg (n = 27, 28, 25, and 28, respectively). Ninety-two were MTX-IR; 16 were TNF-IR. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in DAS28-CRP (p = 0.005) was seen for namilumab 150 mg versus placebo and separation was seen as early as week 2 for namilumab 150 mg (p < 0.05), with higher ACR50 and response rates versus placebo at week 12. A dose-response effect was observed across the DAS28-CRP endpoint with separation versus placebo evident from week 2. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were nasopharyngitis (18.5%, 17.9%, 4.0%, 14.3%), dyspnoea (0.0%, 3.6%, 8.0%, 10.7%), bronchitis (7.4%, 3.6%, 4.0%, 3.6%), and headache (3.7%, 3.6%, 12.0%, 0.0%) for placebo and 20, 80, or 150 mg of namilumab, respectively. No serious infections were observed. One serious AE (myocardial infarction) was observed with 150 mg of namilumab. There was no apparent dose relationship for AEs. A biomarker-based disease activity score showed a dose-dependent decrease at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study demonstrates the benefit of inhibiting macrophage activity targeting the GM-CSF for RA. The study met its primary endpoint with a clear dose-response effect. An acceptable tolerability profile was demonstrated over the 12-week study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NEXUS; NCT02379091, submitted November 28, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6471864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64718642019-04-24 Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial Taylor, Peter C. Saurigny, Didier Vencovsky, Jiri Takeuchi, Tsutomu Nakamura, Tadashi Matsievskaia, Galina Hunt, Barbara Wagner, Thomas Souberbielle, Bernard Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Namilumab (AMG203), an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was evaluated in a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR) or anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy (TNF-IR). METHODS: Subcutaneous namilumab (20, 80, or 150 mg) or placebo was administered at baseline and weeks 2, 6, and 10 in patients on stable background methotrexate therapy who were with MTX-IR or TNF-IR. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein version (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 comparing each of the three doses of namilumab to placebo. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events (AEs) and pulmonary parameters. Results were analysed using the per-protocol population. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients from Europe and Japan (48.4 ± 12.02 years old; 77.8% female; mean DAS28-CRP 5.60–5.79; rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibodies + 75%) were randomized to placebo or namilumab 20, 80, or 150 mg (n = 27, 28, 25, and 28, respectively). Ninety-two were MTX-IR; 16 were TNF-IR. At week 12, a statistically significant difference in DAS28-CRP (p = 0.005) was seen for namilumab 150 mg versus placebo and separation was seen as early as week 2 for namilumab 150 mg (p < 0.05), with higher ACR50 and response rates versus placebo at week 12. A dose-response effect was observed across the DAS28-CRP endpoint with separation versus placebo evident from week 2. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were nasopharyngitis (18.5%, 17.9%, 4.0%, 14.3%), dyspnoea (0.0%, 3.6%, 8.0%, 10.7%), bronchitis (7.4%, 3.6%, 4.0%, 3.6%), and headache (3.7%, 3.6%, 12.0%, 0.0%) for placebo and 20, 80, or 150 mg of namilumab, respectively. No serious infections were observed. One serious AE (myocardial infarction) was observed with 150 mg of namilumab. There was no apparent dose relationship for AEs. A biomarker-based disease activity score showed a dose-dependent decrease at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study demonstrates the benefit of inhibiting macrophage activity targeting the GM-CSF for RA. The study met its primary endpoint with a clear dose-response effect. An acceptable tolerability profile was demonstrated over the 12-week study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NEXUS; NCT02379091, submitted November 28, 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-18 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6471864/ /pubmed/30999929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Taylor, Peter C.
Saurigny, Didier
Vencovsky, Jiri
Takeuchi, Tsutomu
Nakamura, Tadashi
Matsievskaia, Galina
Hunt, Barbara
Wagner, Thomas
Souberbielle, Bernard
Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial
title Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of namilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (gm-csf) ligand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ra) with either an inadequate response to background methotrexate therapy or an inadequate response or intolerance to an anti-tnf (tumour necrosis factor) biologic therapy: a randomized, controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30999929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1879-x
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorpeterc efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT saurignydidier efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT vencovskyjiri efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT takeuchitsutomu efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT nakamuratadashi efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT matsievskaiagalina efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT huntbarbara efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT wagnerthomas efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT souberbiellebernard efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn
AT efficacyandsafetyofnamilumabahumanmonoclonalantibodyagainstgranulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfligandinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisrawitheitheraninadequateresponsetobackgroundmethotrexatetherapyoraninadequateresponseorintolerancetoanantitn