Cargando…

“Breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps

BACKGROUND: Women are the fastest-growing population in carceral facilities in Canada. Most incarcerated women are mothers, with above-average parity. The incarceration of women has implications not only for women’s health, but for that of their children. For example, how is breastfeeding and access...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paynter, Martha Jane, Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0211-3
_version_ 1783412141926121472
author Paynter, Martha Jane
Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna
author_facet Paynter, Martha Jane
Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna
author_sort Paynter, Martha Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women are the fastest-growing population in carceral facilities in Canada. Most incarcerated women are mothers, with above-average parity. The incarceration of women has implications not only for women’s health, but for that of their children. For example, how is breastfeeding and access to human milk supported in the context of imprisonment? Both carceral and health services are publicly-funded and administered in Canada. Due in part to the well-documented ill-health burden of imprisoned women, health and carceral functions overlap in the spaces of confinement. This paper discusses “breastfeeding in public” in relation to imprisoned women: separated from the public, yet in publicly-funded spaces under public servant control. With increasing adoption of Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFI) Ten Steps in Canadian health centres, there is a need to consider the health centre spaces precluded from its application and make visible the women and children affected. This paper uses the BFI Steps as a lens to consider the environment of confinement for the breastfeeding incarcerated person. The exclusion of breastfeeding and access to human milk for imprisoned women and children extends the punitive carceral function beyond the experience of incarceration and beyond the experience of the convicted mother. DISCUSSION: Carceral facilities lack breastfeeding policies, foundational to breastfeeding support. Despite high fertility and parity among incarcerated women, carceral health care providers are not required to demonstrate maternity and reproductive health care specialization. The overarching mission of carceral institutions remains security, and support for breastfeeding among incarcerated women is hampered in spaces of conflict, punishment, surveillance and control. A minimal requirement to support exclusive breastfeeding is to promote the mother being with the infant and most incarcerated mothers are separated from their infants. Incarcerated women lack support, information, and community connections for extended breastfeeding beyond six months. Carceral facilities are not welcoming environments for breastfeeding families. Despite the incompatibility of breastfeeding with incarceration, BFI Step 10, coordinating discharge, demonstrates opportunity for improvement through community and health care provider engagement. CONCLUSION: Incarceration challenges the reach and applicability of the BFI Steps to enhance breastfeeding and to problematize the idea of breastfeeding “in public.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6471946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64719462019-04-24 “Breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps Paynter, Martha Jane Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna Int Breastfeed J Commentary BACKGROUND: Women are the fastest-growing population in carceral facilities in Canada. Most incarcerated women are mothers, with above-average parity. The incarceration of women has implications not only for women’s health, but for that of their children. For example, how is breastfeeding and access to human milk supported in the context of imprisonment? Both carceral and health services are publicly-funded and administered in Canada. Due in part to the well-documented ill-health burden of imprisoned women, health and carceral functions overlap in the spaces of confinement. This paper discusses “breastfeeding in public” in relation to imprisoned women: separated from the public, yet in publicly-funded spaces under public servant control. With increasing adoption of Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFI) Ten Steps in Canadian health centres, there is a need to consider the health centre spaces precluded from its application and make visible the women and children affected. This paper uses the BFI Steps as a lens to consider the environment of confinement for the breastfeeding incarcerated person. The exclusion of breastfeeding and access to human milk for imprisoned women and children extends the punitive carceral function beyond the experience of incarceration and beyond the experience of the convicted mother. DISCUSSION: Carceral facilities lack breastfeeding policies, foundational to breastfeeding support. Despite high fertility and parity among incarcerated women, carceral health care providers are not required to demonstrate maternity and reproductive health care specialization. The overarching mission of carceral institutions remains security, and support for breastfeeding among incarcerated women is hampered in spaces of conflict, punishment, surveillance and control. A minimal requirement to support exclusive breastfeeding is to promote the mother being with the infant and most incarcerated mothers are separated from their infants. Incarcerated women lack support, information, and community connections for extended breastfeeding beyond six months. Carceral facilities are not welcoming environments for breastfeeding families. Despite the incompatibility of breastfeeding with incarceration, BFI Step 10, coordinating discharge, demonstrates opportunity for improvement through community and health care provider engagement. CONCLUSION: Incarceration challenges the reach and applicability of the BFI Steps to enhance breastfeeding and to problematize the idea of breastfeeding “in public.” BioMed Central 2019-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6471946/ /pubmed/31019543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0211-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Paynter, Martha Jane
Snelgrove-Clarke, Erna
“Breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps
title “Breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps
title_full “Breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps
title_fullStr “Breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps
title_full_unstemmed “Breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps
title_short “Breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps
title_sort “breastfeeding in public” for incarcerated women: the baby-friendly steps
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0211-3
work_keys_str_mv AT payntermarthajane breastfeedinginpublicforincarceratedwomenthebabyfriendlysteps
AT snelgroveclarkeerna breastfeedinginpublicforincarceratedwomenthebabyfriendlysteps